Jia Xiaoli, Han Haiting, Feng Yuan, Song Peihao, He Ruizhen, Liu Yang, Wang Peng, Zhang Kaihua, Du Chenyu, Ge Shidong, Tian Guohang
College of Landscape Architecture and Art and International Union Laboratory of Landscape Architecture, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, Copenhagen 1953 FC, Denmark.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Oct 10;894:164916. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164916. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
Research indicates that urban ecosystems can store large amounts of carbon. However, few studies have examined how the spatial features of park greenspace affect its carbon-carrying capacity, and how those effects vary with the spatial scale. Lidar point clouds and remote sensing images were extracted for the 196 ha green space in the China Green Expo to study carbon storage and sequestration in parks. Full subset regression, stepwise regression, HP analysis, and structural equation modeling were used to examine the scale dependency and the driving relationship between carbon storage and carbon sequestration in parks. The results show that the optimal statistical sample diameters for carbon density and carbon sequestration density in parks are 100 m. Under the influence of impermeable surfaces and water bodies, the statistical values of carbon density were minimized when the sample plot diameter was 700 m. Biodiversity and forest structure are the main drivers of carbon density, with the influence of water bodies being more prominent on a larger scale. Texture characteristics explain more carbon density than the vegetation index, and RVI could better explain the variation of carbon sequestration than NDVI. This study explores scaled changes in carbon density, carbon sequestration density in parks, and their driving relationships, which can aid in developing carbon sequestration strategies based on parks.
研究表明,城市生态系统能够储存大量碳。然而,很少有研究考察公园绿地的空间特征如何影响其碳承载能力,以及这些影响如何随空间尺度而变化。利用激光雷达点云数据和遥感影像,对中国绿化博览会上196公顷的绿地进行研究,以探讨公园中的碳储存和碳固存情况。采用全子集回归、逐步回归、主成分分析和结构方程模型,研究公园碳储量与碳固存之间的尺度依赖性和驱动关系。结果表明,公园碳密度和碳固存密度的最佳统计样本直径均为100米。在不透水表面和水体的影响下,当样地直径为700米时,碳密度的统计值最小。生物多样性和森林结构是碳密度的主要驱动因素,水体的影响在更大尺度上更为显著。纹理特征比植被指数能解释更多的碳密度,与归一化植被指数相比,比值植被指数能更好地解释碳固存的变化。本研究探讨了公园碳密度、碳固存密度的尺度变化及其驱动关系,有助于制定基于公园的碳固存策略。