van den Bogaard A E, Weidema W F, van Boven C P, van der Waay D
J Hyg (Lond). 1986 Aug;97(1):49-59. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400064342.
The impact of three current types of preoperative large bowel preparation on the microbial flora and the colonization resistance (CR) was investigated in 15 volunteers. In the first group a whole gut irrigation was performed without administration of antibiotics (group WGI). In the second group 0.5 g/l metronidazole and 1 g/l neomycin was added to the irrigation fluid (group WGI + AB). A whole gut irrigation with prior oral administration of 1 l mannitol 10% was performed in the third group. The antibiotic prophylaxis in this group consisted of two doses of 80 mg gentamicin i.v. and 500 mg metronidazole orally 24 h after lavage (group Mann + AB). One hour after the mechanical cleansing procedure was finished all volunteers were orally contaminated with one dose of an Escherichia coli test strain. The aerobic faecal reduction due to the cleansing procedure was 2-3 logs, while for the anaerobes it was 4-5 logs. The anaerobic flora in group WGI recovered within 24 h, while the aerobes showed a transient 'overgrowth' for the period of 2 days. The overgrowth of aerobes in group WGI + AB was observed for more than a week and the total numbers of aerobes started gradually to decline after the anaerobic flora had reached pretreatment levels at day three or four. Despite the normal numbers of anaerobes present 24 h after treatment, overgrowth of E. coli was seen in the group Mann + AB, probably due to residual mannitol left in the intestinal tract. The test strain of E. coli was excreted for a period of 1 week by the volunteers in the groups WGI and Mann + AB, but it was isolated for more than 10 weeks in the group WGI + AB. It is thought that all three methods of preoperative large bowel preparation decreased the CR of the gastrointestinal tract because of a disturbance of the interaction between aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms and alterations of the colonic wall. The anaerobic microflora, however, appeared to be primarily responsible for the maintenance of the CR. Antimicrobial prophylaxis should consist of a high dose, short term, systemic antibiotic regimen, not only because an adequate serum level of an appropriate drug at the time of operation substantially decreases the incidence of postoperative septic complications but also because a systemic regimen scarcely influences the CR of the gastrointestinal tract. beta-Aspartylglycine appeared to be a specific but not very sensitive marker for decreased CR.
在15名志愿者中研究了三种当前类型的术前大肠准备对微生物菌群和定植抗力(CR)的影响。第一组进行全肠道灌洗且不使用抗生素(WGI组)。第二组在灌洗液中添加0.5 g/l甲硝唑和1 g/l新霉素(WGI + AB组)。第三组在口服1升10%甘露醇后进行全肠道灌洗。该组的抗生素预防措施包括在灌洗24小时后静脉注射两剂80毫克庆大霉素和口服500毫克甲硝唑(Mann + AB组)。机械清洁程序完成1小时后,所有志愿者口服一剂大肠杆菌测试菌株进行污染。由于清洁程序,需氧粪便菌减少2 - 3个对数级,而厌氧菌减少4 - 5个对数级。WGI组的厌氧菌群在24小时内恢复,而需氧菌在2天内出现短暂的“过度生长”。WGI + AB组需氧菌的过度生长持续了一周多,在第三天或第四天厌氧菌群达到预处理水平后,需氧菌总数开始逐渐下降。尽管治疗24小时后厌氧菌数量正常,但Mann + AB组仍出现大肠杆菌过度生长,可能是由于肠道中残留的甘露醇所致。WGI组和Mann + AB组的志愿者将大肠杆菌测试菌株排出了1周,但在WGI + AB组中该菌株被分离出超过10周。据认为,所有三种术前大肠准备方法均因需氧和厌氧微生物之间相互作用的紊乱以及结肠壁的改变而降低了胃肠道的CR。然而,厌氧微生物群似乎是维持CR的主要原因。抗菌预防应包括高剂量、短期的全身抗生素方案,这不仅是因为手术时适当药物的足够血清水平可大幅降低术后败血症并发症发生率,还因为全身用药方案几乎不影响胃肠道的CR。β - 天冬氨酰甘氨酸似乎是CR降低的一个特异性但不太敏感的标志物。