University of Cambridge, UK.
University of Bath, UK.
Assessment. 2024 Jun;31(4):774-793. doi: 10.1177/10731911231182687. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
Bifactor models are increasingly being utilized to study latent constructs such as psychopathology and cognition, which change over the lifespan. Although longitudinal measurement invariance (MI) testing helps ensure valid interpretation of change in a construct over time, this is rarely and inconsistently performed in bifactor models. Our review of MI simulation literature revealed that only one study assessed MI in bifactor models under limited conditions. Recommendations for how to assess MI in bifactor models are suggested based on existing simulation studies of related models. Estimator choice and influence of missing data on MI are also discussed. An empirical example based on a model of the general psychopathology factor () elucidates our recommendations, with the present model of being the first to exhibit residual MI across gender and time. Thus, changes in the ordered-categorical indicators can be attributed to changes in the latent factors. However, further work is needed to clarify MI guidelines for bifactor models, including considering the impact of model complexity and number of indicators. Nonetheless, using the guidelines justified herein to establish MI allows findings from bifactor models to be more confidently interpreted, increasing their comparability and utility.
双因素模型越来越多地被用于研究心理病理学和认知等随时间变化的潜在结构。虽然纵向测量不变性(MI)测试有助于确保随时间推移对结构变化的有效解释,但在双因素模型中很少且不一致地进行此测试。我们对 MI 模拟文献的回顾表明,只有一项研究在有限的条件下评估了双因素模型中的 MI。根据相关模型的现有模拟研究,提出了如何在双因素模型中评估 MI 的建议。还讨论了估计器选择和缺失数据对 MI 的影响。基于一般精神病理学因素()模型的实证示例说明了我们的建议,目前的模型是第一个在性别和时间上表现出残余 MI 的模型。因此,有序分类指标的变化可以归因于潜在因素的变化。然而,需要进一步的工作来澄清双因素模型的 MI 准则,包括考虑模型复杂性和指标数量的影响。尽管如此,使用本文中提出的 MI 准则可以更有信心地解释双因素模型的结果,从而提高其可比性和实用性。