Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for treating spinal metastases.

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of spinal metastases.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases according to the PRISMA statement (as of September 20, 2022). Two independent investigators screened articles based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and included studies with primary outcomes of pain relief, tumor control, and complications. Article quality was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles were finally included in this study, including 630 patients with spinal metastases, with ages ranging from 51.4 to 71.3 years. Of these, 393 (62.4%) underwent MWA and 237 (37.6%) underwent RFA. After MWA and RFA treatment, visual analog scale scores significantly decreased, and the local tumor control rates were all above 80%. Complications were reported in 27.4% of patients treated with MWA compared with 10.9% of patients treated with RFA.

CONCLUSION

The results of this systematic review suggest that MWA alone or in combination with surgery and RFA in combination with other modalities may improve pain caused by primary tumor metastasis to the spine, and MWA alone or in combination with surgery may have better local tumor control. However, MWA appears to result in more major complications than RFA in combination with other treatment modalities.