Song Zhenzhen, Zhao Yanfen, Liu Zhu, Li Bing
Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 63 Wenhua Road, Nanchong City, 637000, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China.
Department of Radiology, No.971 Hospital of Navy, 6 Shandong Road, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 19;15(1):9537. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93233-9.
We sought to assess and compare the effectiveness and safety of cryoablation (CA) and microwave ablation (MWA) in treating paravertebral metastases of VX2 in rabbits. A rabbit VX2 paravertebral metastases model was established under computed tomography (CT) guidance, with a modeling success rate of 88.23% (60/68). Sixty successfully modeled rabbits were randomly allocated into the MWA group (n = 30) and CA group (n = 30). A comparative analysis between the CA and MWA groups included assessments of the complete ablation rate, operation time, post-ablation pain, and complication rate. The complete ablation rate in the CA group (86.67%) was higher than that in the MWA group (63.33%) (P < 0.05), and the operation time in the CA group was notably longer than that in the MWA group (P < 0.05). The BRPS ( Bristol Rabbit Pain Scale)scores in both groups decreased at 5 time points after treatment, the post-treatment points scores in the CA group were lower than those in the MWA group (P < 0.001). At a follow-up of 21 days postoperatively, the complication rate in the CA group (10.00%) was significantly lower than that in the MWA group (33.33%) (P < 0.05), with 6 rabbits in the MWA group experiencing severe complications. Compared to MWA, CA for paravertebral metastases demonstrates higher efficacy and safety.
我们旨在评估和比较冷冻消融(CA)与微波消融(MWA)治疗兔VX2椎旁转移瘤的有效性和安全性。在计算机断层扫描(CT)引导下建立兔VX2椎旁转移瘤模型,建模成功率为88.23%(60/68)。将60只建模成功的兔随机分为MWA组(n = 30)和CA组(n = 30)。CA组和MWA组之间的对比分析包括对完全消融率、手术时间、消融后疼痛及并发症发生率的评估。CA组的完全消融率(86.67%)高于MWA组(63.33%)(P < 0.05),且CA组的手术时间显著长于MWA组(P < 0.05)。两组治疗后5个时间点的布里斯托尔兔疼痛量表(BRPS)评分均降低,CA组治疗后各时间点评分低于MWA组(P < 0.001)。术后21天随访时,CA组的并发症发生率(10.00%)显著低于MWA组(33.33%)(P < 0.05),MWA组有6只兔出现严重并发症。与MWA相比,CA治疗椎旁转移瘤具有更高的有效性和安全性。