Faculty of Public Health, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand.
Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi, Chonburi Province, Thailand.
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287616. eCollection 2023.
Head louse infestations remain a global public-health concern due to increased resistance of lice to artificial pediculicides. In Thailand, there is a lack of comparative data on the current efficacy of pediculicides for treating head lice. In this study, we explored the status of botanical and toxic synthetic pediculicides with that of 4% dimeticone liquid gel for treating head lice in Thailand. The ex-vivo pediculicidal activity of various pediculicidal shampoos available at drugstores in Thailand was assessed and compared with that of 4% dimeticone liquid gel. The shampoos chosen were based on active ingredients toxic to lice (1% permethrin, 0.6% carbaryl, 0.15% Stemona root crude extract, or mixed plant extracts), whereas dimeticone acts physically on lice. We found that exposure to 4% dimeticone liquid gel following the manufacturer's instructions completely killed 100% of head lice in 15 min, whereas other pediculicide products failed to kill the great majority of head lice, whether treatment was for 10 min (resulting in 0% to 50.0% mortality) or 30 min (resulting in 17.0% to 60.0% mortality). We also extended a clinical assessment to confirm the efficacy of 1% permethrin for treating head lice in infested schoolchildren. In this clinical assessment, none of the 26 children treated with 1% permethrin shampoo achieved a cure after two applications. These results highlight that 4% dimeticone demonstrated a higher ex-vivo pediculicidal efficacy compared to both chemical and botanical pediculicides in Thailand. Conversely, 1% permethrin showed low efficacy in both laboratory and clinical assessments. Given its physical mode of action, 4% dimeticone merits consideration as an alternative treatment option for lice in Thailand, particularly in cases where treatment with toxic pediculicides has proven ineffective.
由于头虱对人工除虱剂的抵抗力增强,头虱感染仍然是全球公共卫生关注的问题。在泰国,缺乏关于目前治疗头虱的除虱剂疗效的比较数据。在这项研究中,我们研究了泰国市售的植物性和毒性合成除虱剂与 4%二甲硅油液体凝胶的治疗效果。评估了泰国药店出售的各种除虱香波的体外杀虱活性,并与 4%二甲硅油液体凝胶进行了比较。选择的香波基于对虱子有毒的活性成分(1%氯菊酯,0.6%残杀威,0.15%百部根粗提物或混合植物提取物),而二甲硅油则通过物理作用作用于虱子。我们发现,按照制造商的说明使用 4%二甲硅油液体凝胶 15 分钟即可完全杀死 100%的头虱,而其他除虱剂产品则未能杀死绝大多数头虱,无论是治疗 10 分钟(死亡率为 0%至 50.0%)还是 30 分钟(死亡率为 17.0%至 60.0%)。我们还进行了临床评估,以确认 1%氯菊酯治疗受感染学童头虱的疗效。在这项临床评估中,用 1%氯菊酯香波治疗的 26 名儿童中,没有一名达到治愈,两次应用后均未治愈。这些结果表明,与泰国的化学和植物性除虱剂相比,4%二甲硅油在体外具有更高的杀虱效果。相反,1%氯菊酯在实验室和临床评估中均显示出低疗效。鉴于其物理作用方式,4%二甲硅油值得考虑作为泰国虱子的替代治疗选择,尤其是在有毒除虱剂治疗无效的情况下。