Suppr超能文献

最广泛使用的重复经颅磁刺激方案的神经调节作用和可重复性。

Neuromodulatory effects and reproducibility of the most widely used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols.

机构信息

Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America.

Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0286465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286465. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is widely used in both research and clinical settings to modulate human brain function and behavior through the engagement of the mechanisms of plasticity. Based upon experiments using single-pulse TMS as a probe, the physiologic mechanism of these effects is often assumed to be via changes in cortical excitability, with 10 Hz rTMS increasing and 1 Hz rTMS decreasing the excitability of the stimulated region. However, the reliability and reproducibility of these rTMS protocols on cortical excitability across and within individual subjects, particularly in comparison to robust sham stimulation, have not been systematically examined.

OBJECTIVES

In a cohort of 28 subjects (39 ± 16 years), we report the first comprehensive study to (1) assess the neuromodulatory effects of traditional 1 Hz and 10 Hz rTMS on corticospinal excitability against both a robust sham control, and two other widely used patterned rTMS protocols (intermittent theta burst stimulation, iTBS; and continuous theta burst stimulation, cTBS), and (2) determine the reproducibility of all rTMS protocols across identical repeat sessions.

RESULTS

At the group level, neither 1 Hz nor 10 Hz rTMS significantly modulated corticospinal excitability. 1 Hz and 10 Hz rTMS were also not significantly different from sham and both TBS protocols. Reproducibility was poor for all rTMS protocols except for sham. Importantly, none of the real rTMS and TBS protocols demonstrated greater neuromodulatory effects or reproducibility after controlling for potential experimental factors including baseline corticospinal excitability, TMS coil deviation and the number of individual MEP trials.

CONCLUSIONS

These results call into question the effectiveness and reproducibility of widely used rTMS techniques for modulating corticospinal excitability, and suggest the need for a fundamental rethinking regarding the potential mechanisms by which rTMS affects brain function and behavior in humans.

摘要

背景

重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)广泛应用于研究和临床领域,通过利用可塑性机制来调节人类大脑功能和行为。基于使用单脉冲 TMS 作为探针的实验,这些效应的生理机制通常被假设为通过皮质兴奋性的变化,10 Hz rTMS 增加和 1 Hz rTMS 降低刺激区域的兴奋性。然而,这些 rTMS 方案在个体内和个体间皮质兴奋性的可靠性和可重复性,特别是与强大的假刺激相比,尚未得到系统检查。

目的

在 28 名受试者(39±16 岁)的队列中,我们报告了第一项全面研究,(1)评估传统的 1 Hz 和 10 Hz rTMS 对皮质脊髓兴奋性的神经调节作用,与强大的假刺激对照,并与两种广泛使用的模式 rTMS 方案(间歇性 theta 爆发刺激,iTBS;和连续 theta 爆发刺激,cTBS)进行比较,(2)确定所有 rTMS 方案在相同重复疗程中的可重复性。

结果

在组水平上,1 Hz 和 10 Hz rTMS 均未显著调节皮质脊髓兴奋性。1 Hz 和 10 Hz rTMS 与 sham 和两种 TBS 方案也没有显著差异。除了 sham,所有 rTMS 方案的可重复性都很差。重要的是,在控制潜在的实验因素(包括皮质脊髓兴奋性基线、TMS 线圈偏差和个体 MEP 试验次数)后,没有任何真实的 rTMS 和 TBS 方案表现出更强的神经调节作用或可重复性。

结论

这些结果对广泛使用的 rTMS 技术调节皮质脊髓兴奋性的有效性和可重复性提出了质疑,并表明需要对 rTMS 影响人类大脑功能和行为的潜在机制进行根本性的重新思考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/060e/10289434/e41c6cbe323b/pone.0286465.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验