Suppr超能文献

家庭层面的登革热伊蚊干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Interventions against Aedes/dengue at the household level: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Instituto de Investigaciones, Centro Universitario de Zacapa, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, Guatemala.

Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

EBioMedicine. 2023 Jul;93:104660. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104660. Epub 2023 Jun 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because the evidence for the role of structural housing and combinations of interventions (domestic or peri-domestic) against Aedes mosquitoes or dengue is still lacking, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyse and synthesize research focusing on the household as the unit of allocation.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, LILACS, and Web of Science databases until February 2023 using three general keyword categories: (1) "Aedes" or "dengue"; (2) structural housing interventions including "house", "water", or "drainage"; and (3) vector control interventions of potential relevance and their combinations. We performed a qualitative content analysis and a meta-analysis for 13 entries on dengue seroconversion data.

FINDINGS

14,272 articles were screened by titles, 615 by abstracts, 79 by full-text. 61 were selected. Satisfactory data quality allowed for detailed content analysis. Interventions at the household level against the immature mosquito stages (21 studies, 34%) showed positive or mixed results in entomological and epidemiological outcomes (86% and 75% respectively). Combined interventions against immature and adult stages (11 studies, 18%) performed similarly (91% and 67%) while those against the adult mosquitoes (29 studies, 48%) performed less well (79%, 22%). A meta-analysis on seroconversion outcomes showed a not-statistically significant reduction for interventions (log odds-ratio: -0.18 [-0.51, 0.14 95% CI]).

INTERPRETATION

No basic research on housing structure or modification was eligible for this systematic review but many interventions with clear impact on vector indices and, to a lesser extent, on dengue were described. The small and not-statistically significant effect size of the meta-analysis highlights the difficulty of proving effectiveness against this highly-clustered disease and of overcoming practical implementation obstacles (e.g. efficacy loss, compliance). The long-term success of interventions depends on suitability, community commitment and official support and promotion. The choice of a specific vector control package needs to take all these context-specific aspects into consideration.

FUNDING

This work was funded by a grant from the World Health Organization (2021/1121668-0, PO 202678425, NTD/VVE).

摘要

背景

由于缺乏结构住房和干预措施组合(家庭内或家庭周围)对伊蚊或登革热作用的证据,本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在分析和综合以家庭为分配单位的研究。

方法

我们使用三个一般关键词类别搜索了 MEDLINE、LILACS 和 Web of Science 数据库,截至 2023 年 2 月:(1)“埃及伊蚊”或“登革热”;(2)结构住房干预措施,包括“房屋”、“水”或“排水”;(3)潜在相关的病媒控制干预措施及其组合。我们对 13 项登革热血清转化率数据进行了定性内容分析和荟萃分析。

发现

通过标题筛选出 14272 篇文章,通过摘要筛选出 615 篇,通过全文筛选出 79 篇。选择了 61 篇。满意的数据质量允许进行详细的内容分析。针对幼蚊阶段的家庭层面干预(21 项研究,34%)在昆虫学和流行病学结果方面显示出积极或混合结果(分别为 86%和 75%)。针对幼蚊和成虫阶段的联合干预(11 项研究,18%)表现相似(分别为 91%和 67%),而针对成蚊的干预(29 项研究,48%)效果较差(分别为 79%,22%)。针对血清转化率结果的荟萃分析显示,干预措施的效果无统计学意义(对数优势比:-0.18[-0.51,0.14 95%CI])。

解释

本系统评价没有合格的住房结构或改造基础研究,但描述了许多对媒介指数有明确影响的干预措施,对登革热的影响程度较小。荟萃分析中效果大小较小且无统计学意义,突出了证明对这种高度聚集性疾病的有效性以及克服实际实施障碍(例如,疗效丧失、合规性)的困难。干预措施的长期成功取决于适宜性、社区承诺和官方支持与推广。选择特定的病媒控制方案需要考虑所有这些特定于背景的方面。

资助

这项工作得到了世界卫生组织的资助(2021/1121668-0,PO 202678425,NTD/VVE)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e59/10333437/578fa58d2f0a/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验