Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Sep;71:81-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.06.024. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
In an effort to improve sepsis outcomes the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) established a time sensitive sepsis management bundle as a core quality measure that includes blood culture collection, serum lactate collection, initiation of intravenous fluid administration, and initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Few studies examine the effects of a prehospital sepsis alert protocol on decreasing time to complete CMS sepsis core measures.
This study was a retrospective cohort study of patients transported via EMS from December 1, 2018 to December 1, 2019 who met the criteria of the Maryland Statewide EMS sepsis protocol and compared outcomes between patients who activated a prehospital sepsis alert and patients who did not activate a prehospital sepsis alert. The Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems developed a sepsis protocol that instructs EMS providers to notify the nearest appropriate facility with a sepsis alert if a patient 18 years of age and older is suspected of having an infection and also presents with at least two of the following: temperature >38 °C or <35.5 °C, a heart rate >100 beats per minute, a respiratory rate >25 breaths per minute or end-tidal carbon dioxide less than or equal to 32 mmHg, a systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, or a point of care lactate reading greater than or equal to 4 mmol/L.
Median time to achieve all four studied CMS sepsis core measures was 103 min [IQR 61-153] for patients who received a prehospital sepsis alert and 106.5 min [IQR 75-189] for patients who did not receive a prehospital sepsis alert (p-value 0.105). Median time to completion was shorter for serum lactate collection (28 min. vs 35 min., p-value 0.019), blood culture collection (28 min. vs 38 min., p-value <0.01), and intravenous fluid administration (54 min. vs 61 min., p-value 0.025) but was not significantly different for antibiotic administration (94 min. vs 103 min., p-value 0.12) among patients who triggered a sepsis alert.
This study questions the effectiveness of prehospital sepsis alert protocols on decreasing time to complete CMS sepsis core measures. Future studies should address if these times can be impacted by having EMS providers independently administer antibiotics.
为了改善脓毒症的预后,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)制定了一个时间敏感的脓毒症管理捆绑作为核心质量指标,其中包括采集血培养、采集血清乳酸、开始静脉补液和开始广谱抗生素治疗。很少有研究探讨院前脓毒症警报协议对缩短完成 CMS 脓毒症核心措施时间的影响。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2018 年 12 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 1 日期间通过急救医疗服务(EMS)转运的符合马里兰州全州 EMS 脓毒症协议标准的患者,并比较了激活院前脓毒症警报的患者与未激活院前脓毒症警报的患者的结局。马里兰州急救医疗服务系统研究所制定了一个脓毒症协议,该协议指示 EMS 提供者如果 18 岁及以上的患者疑似感染,并且还存在以下至少两种情况,应通知最近的适当医疗机构进行脓毒症警报:体温>38°C 或<35.5°C,心率>100 次/分钟,呼吸频率>25 次/分钟或呼气末二氧化碳分压≤32mmHg,收缩压<90mmHg,或床边乳酸读数≥4mmol/L。
对于接受院前脓毒症警报的患者,达到所有四项研究的 CMS 脓毒症核心措施的中位时间为 103 分钟[IQR 61-153],而对于未接受院前脓毒症警报的患者,达到所有四项措施的中位时间为 106.5 分钟[IQR 75-189](p 值为 0.105)。血清乳酸采集(28 分钟 vs 35 分钟,p 值为 0.019)、血培养采集(28 分钟 vs 38 分钟,p 值<0.01)和静脉补液(54 分钟 vs 61 分钟,p 值为 0.025)的中位完成时间更短,但在触发脓毒症警报的患者中,抗生素治疗的中位完成时间(94 分钟 vs 103 分钟,p 值为 0.12)并无显著差异。
本研究对院前脓毒症警报协议在缩短完成 CMS 脓毒症核心措施时间方面的有效性提出了质疑。未来的研究应探讨是否可以通过让 EMS 提供者独立给予抗生素来影响这些时间。