Suppr超能文献

SPICT 作为预测工具,用于预测急诊科老年患者 1 年内健康恶化和死亡的风险:比利时的一项双中心队列研究。

SPICT as a predictive tool for risk of 1-year health degradation and death in older patients admitted to the emergency department: a bicentric cohort study in Belgium.

机构信息

Institut de Recherche Santé et Société, Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Clos Chapelle-aux-Champs, 30, Bruxelles, 1200, Belgium.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire - UCL - Namur, Avenue Gaston Thérasse 1, Yvoir, 5530, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jun 24;22(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01201-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older patients are increasingly showing multi-comorbidities, including advanced chronic diseases. When admitted to the emergency department (ED), the decision to pursue life-prolonging treatments or to initiate a palliative care approach is a challenge for clinicians. We test for the first time the diagnostic accuracy of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) in the ED to identify older patients at risk of deteriorating and dying, and timely address palliative care needs.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective bicentric cohort study on 352 older patients (≥ 75 years) admitted to two EDs in Belgium between December 2019 and March 2020 and between August and November 2020. SPICT (French version, 2019) variables were collected during the patients' admission to the ED, along with socio-demographic, medical and functional data. The palliative profile was defined as a positive SPICT assessment. Survival, symptoms and health degradation (≥ 1 point in ADL Katz score or institutionalisation and death) were followed at 12 months by phone. Main accuracy measures were sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios (LR) as well as cox regression, survival analysis using the Kaplan Meier method, and ordinal regression.

RESULTS

Out of 352 patients included in the study (mean age 83 ± 5.5 years, 43% male), 167 patients (47%) had a positive SPICT profile. At one year follow up, SPICT positive patients presented significantly more health degradation (72%) compared with SPICT negative patients (35%, p < 0.001). SPICT positivity was correlated with 1-year health degradation (OR 4.9; p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of SPICT to predict health degradation were 0.65 (95%CI, 0.57-0.73) and 0.72 (95%CI, 0.64-0.80) respectively, with a negative LR of 0.48 (95%CI, 0.38-0.60) and a positive LR of 2.37 (1.78-3.16). The survival time was shorter in SPICT positive patients than in SPICT negative ones (p < 0.001), the former having a higher 1-year mortality rate (HR = 4.21; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SPICT successfully identifies older patients at high risk of health degradation and death. It can support emergency clinicians to identify older patients with a palliative profile and subsequently initiate a palliative care approach with a discussion on goals of care.

摘要

背景

越来越多的老年患者表现出多种合并症,包括晚期慢性疾病。当他们被收入急诊科(ED)时,临床医生需要在是否进行延长生命的治疗和启动姑息治疗之间做出决策,这是一个挑战。我们首次在 ED 中测试支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT)的诊断准确性,以识别有恶化和死亡风险的老年患者,并及时满足姑息治疗需求。

方法

我们在 2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 3 月和 2020 年 8 月至 11 月期间在比利时的两家 ED 对 352 名(≥75 岁)老年患者进行了前瞻性双中心队列研究。在患者入院 ED 期间收集 SPICT(法语版,2019 年)变量,以及社会人口统计学、医学和功能数据。姑息治疗特征定义为 SPICT 评估阳性。通过电话在 12 个月时随访生存、症状和健康恶化(ADL Katz 评分≥1 分或住院和死亡)。主要准确性测量指标为灵敏度、特异性和似然比(LR),以及 Cox 回归、Kaplan-Meier 方法的生存分析和有序回归。

结果

在纳入的 352 名患者中(平均年龄 83±5.5 岁,43%为男性),167 名患者(47%)SPICT 评分阳性。在 1 年随访时,SPICT 阳性患者的健康恶化发生率显著高于 SPICT 阴性患者(72% vs. 35%,p<0.001)。SPICT 阳性与 1 年健康恶化相关(OR 4.9;p<0.001)。SPICT 预测健康恶化的灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.65(95%CI,0.57-0.73)和 0.72(95%CI,0.64-0.80),负似然比为 0.48(95%CI,0.38-0.60),正似然比为 2.37(1.78-3.16)。SPICT 阳性患者的生存时间短于 SPICT 阴性患者(p<0.001),前者 1 年死亡率更高(HR=4.21;p<0.001)。

结论

SPICT 可成功识别有健康恶化和死亡高风险的老年患者。它可以帮助急诊科临床医生识别有姑息治疗特征的老年患者,并随后启动姑息治疗方案,讨论治疗目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcf5/10290336/261e68424f06/12904_2023_1201_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验