• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在急性护理中实施和评估支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT™)。

Implementation and evaluation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™) in acute care.

机构信息

St George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values (ACHEEV), School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Australas J Ageing. 2024 Sep;43(3):591-599. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13308. Epub 2024 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1111/ajag.13308
PMID:38558296
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™) has been used to identify patients at risk of deteriorating and dying within 1 year. Early identification and integration of advance care planning (ACP) provides the opportunity for a better quality of life for patients. The aims of this study were to identify the number of patients who were SPICT™ positive; their mortality rates at 6 and 12 months of the SPICT™ assessment; and level of adherence to ACP documentation.

METHODS

A retrospective audit of the Supportive and Palliative Care database was conducted at an acute aged care precinct in a major metropolitan tertiary referral hospital in New South Wales, Australia. Data comprising demographics, clinical conditions, SPICT™ positivity and compliance with ACP documentation were collected. SPICT™-positive patients and mortality were tracked at 6 and 12 months, respectively.

RESULTS

Data from 153 patients were collected. The mean age of the patients was 84.1 (±7.8) years, and the length of hospital stay was 10 (±24.7) (range 1-269) days. Approximately 37% were from residential care, and 80% had family deciding on their care. About 15% died during hospitalisation, and 48% were discharged to a care facility. The ACP documentation showed various levels of completion. Mortality rates at 6 and 12 months were 36% and 39%, respectively. Most patients (99%) were SPICT™-positive, with indicators correlating with higher mortality rates at both follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

The study emphasises the critical need for addressing ACP and palliative care among older patients with life-limiting conditions. It underscores the importance of timely discussions, documentation, and cessation of futile interventions.

摘要

目的

支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT)已被用于识别在 1 年内有恶化和死亡风险的患者。早期识别和整合预先医疗指示(ACP)为患者提供了提高生活质量的机会。本研究的目的是确定 SPICT 阳性患者的数量;他们在接受 SPICT 评估后 6 个月和 12 个月的死亡率;以及 ACP 文件记录的遵守程度。

方法

在澳大利亚新南威尔士州一家主要大都市三级转诊医院的急性老年护理区进行了支持性和姑息治疗数据库的回顾性审计。收集了人口统计学、临床状况、SPICT 阳性和 ACP 文件记录合规性的数据。分别在 6 个月和 12 个月时跟踪 SPICT 阳性患者和死亡率。

结果

共收集了 153 名患者的数据。患者的平均年龄为 84.1(±7.8)岁,住院时间为 10(±24.7)(范围 1-269)天。约 37%的患者来自养老院,80%的患者由家属决定其护理。约 15%的患者在住院期间死亡,48%的患者出院到护理机构。ACP 文件记录显示了不同程度的完成情况。6 个月和 12 个月的死亡率分别为 36%和 39%。大多数患者(99%)为 SPICT 阳性,在两次随访中,与死亡率较高相关的指标。

结论

该研究强调了在生命有限的老年患者中解决 ACP 和姑息治疗的迫切需要。它强调了及时讨论、文件记录和停止无效干预的重要性。

相似文献

1
Implementation and evaluation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™) in acute care.在急性护理中实施和评估支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT™)。
Australas J Ageing. 2024 Sep;43(3):591-599. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13308. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
2
Palliative Referrals in Advanced Cancer Patients: Utilizing the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool and Rothman Index.晚期癌症患者的姑息治疗转介:使用支持性和姑息治疗指标工具及 Rothman 指数。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Feb;39(2):164-168. doi: 10.1177/10499091211017873. Epub 2021 May 18.
3
SPICT as a predictive tool for risk of 1-year health degradation and death in older patients admitted to the emergency department: a bicentric cohort study in Belgium.SPICT 作为预测工具,用于预测急诊科老年患者 1 年内健康恶化和死亡的风险:比利时的一项双中心队列研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jun 24;22(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01201-9.
4
Validation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool in a Geriatric Population.支持性和姑息治疗指标工具在老年人群中的验证。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;21(2):220-224. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0205. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
5
Systematic identification of critically ill and dying patients in primary care using the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE).使用德国版支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT-DE)在初级保健中系统识别危重症和临终患者。
Ger Med Sci. 2020 Feb 3;18:Doc02. doi: 10.3205/000278. eCollection 2020.
6
Structured implementation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool in general practice - A prospective interventional study with follow-up.在一般实践中结构化实施支持和姑息治疗指标工具 - 一项具有随访的前瞻性干预研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Dec 1;21(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01107-y.
7
Development and evaluation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT): a mixed-methods study.支持和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT)的开发和评估:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2014 Sep;4(3):285-90. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000488. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
8
Supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT™) in a Danish healthcare context: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and content validation.支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT™)在丹麦医疗保健环境中的应用:翻译、跨文化调适和内容验证。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Mar 24;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00931-6.
9
Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool prognostic value in older hospitalised patients: a prospective multicentre study.支持性与姑息治疗指标工具对老年住院患者的预后价值:一项前瞻性多中心研究
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 May 31;14(e2). doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003042.
10
Validation of a Supportive and Palliative Care Indicator Tool Among Patients Hospitalized Due to Heart Failure.心力衰竭住院患者支持性与姑息治疗指标工具的验证
J Card Fail. 2025 Jan;31(1):16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.04.016. Epub 2024 May 10.