Center for Pain Research and Behavioral Health, University of Florida.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024 Apr;32(2):228-235. doi: 10.1037/pha0000664. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
Although laboratory studies indicate alcohol reduces pain intensity and increases pain threshold, these effects likely do not completely explain perceived pain relief from alcohol intake. In this study, we tested expectancy of alcohol analgesia (EAA) as a moderator of subjective pain relief following oral alcohol challenge in individuals with and without chronic orofacial pain. Social drinkers ( = 48; 19 chronic pain; 29 pain-free controls) completed two testing sessions: alcohol administration (BrAC: 0.08 g/dL) and placebo. Alcohol expectancy (AE) was assessed using the EAA questionnaire and two 100-mm Visual Analogue Scales (VASs) regarding strength of belief that alcohol provides pain relief (AE VAS 1) or reduces pain sensitivity (AE VAS 2). Participants completed quantitative sensory testing (QST) involving application of pressure to the masseter insertion. Pain threshold (lbf; three repetitions) and pain intensity (4, 5, and 6 lbf; three repetitions each; 100-mm VAS) were collected. After each stimulus, participants rated perceived pain relief due to consumption of the study beverage (0-100 VAS). Higher EAA and AE VAS 1 ratings were associated with stronger perceived relief in the alcohol, but not placebo, condition. However, expectancy specifically related to reduction in pain sensitivity (AE VAS 2) was not associated with relief. Additionally, changes in pain threshold and intensity were not significantly correlated with perceived relief. Taken together, results suggest expectancy that alcohol provides pain relief is an important determinant of its negative reinforcing effects. Future studies should investigate challenging these expectancies as a means of reducing alcohol-related risk in people with pain. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
虽然实验室研究表明酒精能降低疼痛强度并提高疼痛阈值,但这些作用可能并不能完全解释人们饮酒后感受到的疼痛缓解。在这项研究中,我们测试了酒精镇痛期望(EAA)作为个体在有无慢性口腔颌面疼痛情况下口服酒精挑战后主观疼痛缓解的调节因素。社交饮酒者(=48;19 例慢性疼痛;29 例无痛对照)完成了两个测试阶段:酒精给药(BrAC:0.08 g/dL)和安慰剂。使用 EAA 问卷和两个 100 毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估酒精期望(AE),分别是对酒精提供疼痛缓解的信念强度(AE VAS 1)或降低疼痛敏感性的信念强度(AE VAS 2)。参与者完成了涉及咬肌插入部位压力应用的定量感觉测试(QST)。疼痛阈值(磅力;重复三次)和疼痛强度(4、5 和 6 磅力;每次重复三次;100 毫米 VAS)都被收集。在每次刺激后,参与者根据研究饮料的摄入来评定感知到的疼痛缓解程度(0-100 VAS)。更高的 EAA 和 AE VAS 1 评分与酒精而非安慰剂条件下更强的感知缓解相关。然而,与降低疼痛敏感性相关的期望(AE VAS 2)与缓解无关。此外,疼痛阈值和强度的变化与感知到的缓解无关。总的来说,结果表明,对酒精能提供疼痛缓解的期望是其负强化作用的一个重要决定因素。未来的研究应该探讨挑战这些期望作为减少疼痛人群中与酒精相关风险的一种手段。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。