Suppr超能文献

股骨稳定型交锁髓内钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的临床观察与有限元分析。

Clinical observation and finite element analysis of femoral stable interlocking intramedullary nail in intertrochanteric fractures.

机构信息

Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China.

Orthopedic Department, Tianjin Fourth Central Hospital, Tianjin, 300140, China.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2023 Sep;47(9):2319-2326. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05865-z. Epub 2023 Jun 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was designed to compare clinical outcomes of the femoral stable interlocking intramedullary nail (FSIIN) with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures (OTA 31A1 + A2).

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed a registered sample of 74 intertrochanteric fractures (OTA 31A1 + A2) surgically treated using FSIIN (n = 36) or PFNA (n = 38) from January 2015 to December 2021. The intra-operative variables (operation time, fluoroscopy time, intra-operative blood loss, length of incision) and fracture healing time were compared between the two groups in this study. Harris hip score (HHS) and visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the functional states. At the last follow-up, the incidence of related complications in patients was calculated. Eventually, the 3D finite element model was established to analyze the stress of FSIIN and PFNA.

RESULTS

The distribution of all basic characteristics was similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). The operation time, fluoroscopy time, intra-operative blood loss, and length of incision were significantly decreased in the FSIIN group (p < 0.001). The FSIIN group had a shorter fracture healing time than the PFNA group (p < 0.001). There is no significant difference between the two groups in the Harris and VAS (p > 0.05). The incidences of post-operative anaemia, electrolyte imbalance, varus malalignment, and thigh pain were significantly lower in FSIIN than in PFNA groups (all p < 0.05). The finite element results show that the stress shielding effect of FSIIN is smaller.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that FSIIN seemed to be superior to PFNA in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures (OTA 31A1 + A2) due to less surgical damage and shorter fracture healing time.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较股骨稳定交锁髓内钉(FSIIN)与股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)治疗股骨转子间骨折(OTA 31A1+A2)的临床效果。

方法

本研究回顾性分析了 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月采用 FSIIN(n=36)或 PFNA(n=38)治疗的 74 例股骨转子间骨折(OTA 31A1+A2)的注册样本。比较两组患者的术中变量(手术时间、透视时间、术中出血量、切口长度)和骨折愈合时间。采用 Harris 髋关节评分(HHS)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估功能状态。末次随访时,计算患者相关并发症的发生率。最后,建立 3D 有限元模型分析 FSIIN 和 PFNA 的应力分布。

结果

两组患者的所有基本特征分布相似(p>0.05)。FSIIN 组的手术时间、透视时间、术中出血量和切口长度明显缩短(p<0.001)。FSIIN 组的骨折愈合时间短于 PFNA 组(p<0.001)。两组间 Harris 和 VAS 评分无显著差异(p>0.05)。FSIIN 组术后贫血、电解质失衡、内翻畸形和大腿疼痛的发生率明显低于 PFNA 组(均 p<0.05)。有限元结果表明 FSIIN 的应力遮挡效应较小。

结论

本研究表明,FSIIN 治疗股骨转子间骨折(OTA 31A1+A2)的手术损伤较小,骨折愈合时间较短,可能优于 PFNA。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验