Herdt Brandon L, Ikner Luisa A
Ecolab Inc., Eagan, MN, USA.
Department of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Infect Prev Pract. 2023 Sep;5(3):100293. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100293. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
Hand hygiene is critical to lower the potential for the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and other infectious agents by direct contact. When running water and soap are not available for hand hygiene, ethanol-based hand sanitizers are currently the recommended standard of care [1-3]. Though recently published data showed comparable effectiveness of benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-based and ethanol-based hand sanitizers against SARS-CoV-2 virus, a paucity of peer-reviewed data on the effectiveness of these formulations against other types of infective coronaviruses remains. This work assessed human coronavirus HCoV-229E (genus ) concurrently with SARS-CoV-2, Isolate USA-WA1/2020 (genus ) to fill this gap.
The test was conducted according to EN14476:2013-A2:2019 [EN14476] Quantitative Suspension Test for the Evaluation of Virucidal Activity in the Medical Area [4]. Two BAK-based hand sanitizers, five ethanol-based hand sanitizers, and an 80% ethanol reference formulation were tested for antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E at 15- and 30- second contact times.
Both SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E were reduced by greater than 4.00-log within 15 seconds of contact. Virus decay constants () following first-order kinetics were similar for BAK and ethanol-based formulations against both test viruses. The SARS-CoV-2 results reported herein mirrored previous data reported by Herdt (2021).
BAK and ethanol hand sanitizer formulations inactivate SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E at similar rates. This data supports previously published effectiveness data for both chemistries and indicates that additional coronavirus strains and variants would demonstrate similar inactivation trends.
手部卫生对于降低严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)和其他传染源通过直接接触传播的可能性至关重要。当没有流动水和肥皂用于手部卫生时,乙醇类洗手液是目前推荐的护理标准[1-3]。尽管最近发表的数据显示,基于苯扎氯铵(BAK)的洗手液和乙醇类洗手液对SARS-CoV-2病毒的有效性相当,但关于这些制剂对其他类型感染性冠状病毒有效性的同行评审数据仍然匮乏。这项研究同时评估了人冠状病毒HCoV-229E(属)和SARS-CoV-2、美国华盛顿州分离株USA-WA1/2020(属),以填补这一空白。
该测试按照EN14476:2013-A2:2019[EN14476]《医疗领域病毒杀灭活性评估的定量悬浮试验》[4]进行。测试了两种基于BAK的洗手液、五种乙醇类洗手液和一种80%乙醇参考制剂在15秒和30秒接触时间下对SARS-CoV-2和HCoV-229E的抗病毒活性。
在接触15秒内,SARS-CoV-2和HCoV-229E均减少了超过4.00对数。BAK和乙醇类制剂对两种测试病毒的一级动力学病毒衰减常数()相似。本文报告的SARS-CoV-2结果与赫特(2021年)之前报告的数据一致。
BAK和乙醇洗手液制剂使SARS-CoV-2和HCoV-229E失活的速率相似。该数据支持了之前公布的两种化学制剂的有效性数据,并表明其他冠状病毒株和变种将表现出相似的失活趋势。