• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估市售手部消毒剂的抗菌性能。

Evaluating the Antimicrobial Properties of Commercial Hand Sanitizers.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.

出版信息

mSphere. 2021 Mar 3;6(2):e00062-21. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00062-21.

DOI:10.1128/mSphere.00062-21
PMID:33658274
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8546682/
Abstract

Hand sanitizers have been developed as a convenient means to decontaminate an individual's hands of bacterial pathogens in situations in which soap and water are not available. Yet to our knowledge, no study has compared the antibacterial efficacy of a large collection of hand sanitizers. Using zone of growth inhibition and kill curve assays, we assessed the performance of 46 commercially available hand sanitizers that were obtained from national chain big-box stores, gasoline stations, pharmacies, and boutiques for antibacterial activity toward prototypical Gram-positive () and Gram-negative () bacterial pathogens. Results revealed substantial variability in the efficacy of many sanitizers evaluated. Formulations following World Health Organization-recommended ingredients (80% ethanol or 75% isopropyl alcohol) or those including benzalkonium chloride as the active principal ingredient displayed excellent antibacterial activity, whereas others exhibited modest or poor activity in the assays performed. Results also revealed that was generally more susceptible to most sanitizers in comparison to and that there was significant strain-to-strain variability in hand sanitizer antimicrobial efficacy regardless of the organism evaluated. Further, tests of a subset of hand sanitizers toward severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) revealed no direct correlation between antibacterial and antiviral performance, with all ethyl alcohol formulations performing equally well and displaying improved activity in comparison to benzalkonium chloride-containing sanitizer. Taken together, these results indicate that there is likely to be substantial variability in the antimicrobial performance of commercially available hand sanitizers, particularly toward bacterial pathogens, and a need to evaluate the efficacy of sanitizers under development. In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, hand hygiene has taken on a prominent role in efforts to mitigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission and infection, which has led to a radical increase in the number and types of hand sanitizers manufactured to meet public demand. To our knowledge, no studies have evaluated or compared the antimicrobial performance of hand sanitizers that are being produced under COVID-19 emergency authorization. Tests of 46 commercially available hand sanitizers purchased from national chain brick-and-mortar stores revealed considerable variability in their antibacterial performance toward two bacterial pathogens of immediate health care concern, and Expanded testing of a subset of hand sanitizers revealed no direct correlation between antibacterial performance of individual sanitizers and their activity toward SARS-CoV-2. These results indicate that as the pandemic subsides, there will be a need to validate the antimicrobial efficacy of sanitizers being produced.

摘要

手消毒剂已被开发为一种方便的手段,可在无法使用肥皂和水的情况下对个体手部的细菌病原体进行消毒。然而,据我们所知,尚无研究比较大量市售手消毒剂的抗菌功效。我们使用抑菌环和杀菌曲线测定法,评估了从全国连锁大型商店、加油站、药店和精品店获得的 46 种市售手消毒剂对典型革兰氏阳性菌()和革兰氏阴性菌()细菌病原体的抗菌活性。结果显示,许多被评估的消毒剂的功效存在显著差异。采用世界卫生组织推荐成分(80%乙醇或 75%异丙醇)的配方或含有苯扎氯铵作为有效成分的配方显示出极好的抗菌活性,而其他配方在进行的测定中则表现出适度或较差的活性。结果还表明,与相比,通常大多数消毒剂对更敏感,并且无论评估的生物体如何,手消毒剂的抗微生物功效都存在明显的菌株间差异。此外,对一组手消毒剂对严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的测试表明,抗菌和抗病毒性能之间没有直接相关性,所有乙醇配方的性能相同,并且与含苯扎氯铵的消毒剂相比,表现出更好的活性。综上所述,这些结果表明,市售手消毒剂的抗菌性能可能存在很大差异,特别是对细菌病原体,并且需要评估正在开发的消毒剂的功效。应对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,手部卫生在减轻 SARS-CoV-2 传播和感染的努力中发挥了重要作用,这导致了满足公众需求的大量新型手消毒剂的制造和使用。据我们所知,尚无研究评估或比较正在根据 COVID-19 紧急授权生产的手消毒剂的抗菌性能。从全国连锁实体店购买的 46 种市售手消毒剂的测试结果显示,它们对两种直接关乎医疗保健的细菌病原体(和)的抗菌性能存在很大差异。对手消毒剂的一部分进行了更广泛的测试,结果表明,个别消毒剂的抗菌性能与其对 SARS-CoV-2 的活性之间没有直接相关性。这些结果表明,随着大流行的消退,将需要验证正在生产的消毒剂的抗菌功效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f34/8546682/ca56d5b034aa/msphere.00062-21-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f34/8546682/e45b6aa4f8f9/msphere.00062-21-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f34/8546682/ca56d5b034aa/msphere.00062-21-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f34/8546682/e45b6aa4f8f9/msphere.00062-21-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f34/8546682/ca56d5b034aa/msphere.00062-21-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Antimicrobial Properties of Commercial Hand Sanitizers.评估市售手部消毒剂的抗菌性能。
mSphere. 2021 Mar 3;6(2):e00062-21. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00062-21.
2
Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by commercially available alcohol-based hand sanitizers.商业用酒精类手部消毒剂对 SARS-CoV-2 的灭活作用。
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Mar;49(3):401-402. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.08.020. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
3
Evaluation of a benzalkonium chloride hand sanitizer in reducing transient Staphylococcus aureus bacterial skin contamination in health care workers.评价苯扎氯铵手部消毒剂在减少医护人员暂居性金黄色葡萄球菌皮肤污染中的效果。
Am J Infect Control. 2020 May;48(5):522-526. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.08.030. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
4
Antiviral efficacy of personal care formulations against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.个人护理产品配方对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 的抗病毒功效。
Infect Dis Health. 2021 Feb;26(1):63-66. doi: 10.1016/j.idh.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
5
Evaluation of quality and antimicrobial efficacy of locally manufactured alcohol-based hand sanitizers marketed in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia in the era of COVID-19.评价 COVID-19 大流行时期埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴市市售的国产醇基手部消毒剂的质量和抗菌功效。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Oct 8;11(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01163-2.
6
Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by 2 commercially available Benzalkonium chloride-based hand sanitizers in comparison with an 80% ethanol-based hand sanitizer.两种市售苯扎氯铵类洗手液与一种80%乙醇类洗手液对新冠病毒的灭活效果比较
Infect Prev Pract. 2021 Dec;3(4):100191. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100191. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
7
Alcohol-free hand sanitizer and other quaternary ammonium disinfectants quickly and effectively inactivate SARS-CoV-2.不含酒精的手部消毒剂和其他季铵盐消毒剂可快速、有效地使 SARS-CoV-2 失活。
J Hosp Infect. 2021 Feb;108:142-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.11.023. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
8
Alcohol Sanitizer酒精消毒剂
9
Comparing the antibacterial efficacy and functionality of different commercial alcohol-based sanitizers.比较不同商业酒精基消毒剂的抗菌功效和功能。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 27;18(3):e0282005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282005. eCollection 2023.
10
Development and efficacy assessment of hand sanitizers and polylactic acid films incorporating caffeic acid and vanillin for enhanced antiviral properties against HCoV-229E.含咖啡酸和香草醛的手部消毒剂和聚乳酸薄膜的开发及疗效评估,以增强其抗 HCoV-229E 的抗病毒性能。
Virol J. 2023 Aug 28;20(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12985-023-02159-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Allergens and Other Harmful Substances in Hydroalcoholic Gels: Compliance with Current Regulation.含酒精凝胶中的过敏原及其他有害物质:是否符合现行法规
Methods Protoc. 2023 Oct 7;6(5):95. doi: 10.3390/mps6050095.
2
Antimicrobial Efficacy Assessment and Rheological Investigation of Two Different Hand Sanitizers Compared with the Standard Reference WHO Formulation 1.两种不同洗手液与世界卫生组织标准参考配方1相比的抗菌效果评估及流变学研究
Gels. 2023 Jan 27;9(2):108. doi: 10.3390/gels9020108.
3
Evaluation of quality and antimicrobial efficacy of locally manufactured alcohol-based hand sanitizers marketed in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia in the era of COVID-19.

本文引用的文献

1
Inactivation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 by WHO-Recommended Hand Rub Formulations and Alcohols.世卫组织推荐的手部消毒剂配方和醇类对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 的灭活作用。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;26(7):1592-1595. doi: 10.3201/eid2607.200915. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
2
Virucidal Activity of World Health Organization-Recommended Formulations Against Enveloped Viruses, Including Zika, Ebola, and Emerging Coronaviruses.世界卫生组织推荐的制剂对包括寨卡病毒、埃博拉病毒和新型冠状病毒在内的包膜病毒的杀病毒活性
J Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 15;215(6):902-906. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix046.
3
Comparative assessment of antimicrobial efficacy of different hand sanitizers: An study.
评价 COVID-19 大流行时期埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴市市售的国产醇基手部消毒剂的质量和抗菌功效。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Oct 8;11(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01163-2.
4
Rapid-killing efficacy substantiates the antiseptic property of the synergistic combination of carvacrol and nerol against nosocomial pathogens.快速杀菌功效证实了香芹酚和橙花醇协同组合对医院病原体的防腐性能。
Arch Microbiol. 2022 Sep 2;204(9):590. doi: 10.1007/s00203-022-03197-x.
5
Assessment of disinfectant efficacy in reducing microbial growth.评估消毒剂在减少微生物生长方面的效果。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 27;17(6):e0269850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269850. eCollection 2022.
6
A preliminary evaluation of chemical interaction between sanitizing products and silk.消毒产品与丝绸之间化学相互作用的初步评估。
J Cult Herit. 2021 Sep-Oct;51:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2021.06.012. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
7
Prevalence of alcohol-tolerant and antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens on public hand sanitizer dispensers.公共手部自动售货机上耐酒精和抗生素的细菌病原体的流行情况。
J Hosp Infect. 2022 Sep;127:26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.05.017. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
8
Rhamnolipid Nano-Micelles versus Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer: A Comparative Study for Antibacterial Activity against Hospital-Acquired Infections and Toxicity Concerns.鼠李糖脂纳米微球与酒精基洗手液的比较研究:对医院获得性感染的抗菌活性及毒性问题的比较
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Apr 29;11(5):605. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11050605.
9
Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizers: Does Gelling Agent Really Matter?含酒精洗手液:凝胶剂真的重要吗?
Gels. 2022 Jan 29;8(2):87. doi: 10.3390/gels8020087.
不同洗手液抗菌效果的比较评估:一项研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2016 Sep;13(5):424-431. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.192283.
4
Reduction of Healthcare-Associated Infections by Exceeding High Compliance with Hand Hygiene Practices.通过超高依从性的手卫生措施减少医疗相关感染
Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Sep;22(9):1628-30. doi: 10.3201/eid2209.151440.
5
Virucidal activity of Formulation I of the World Health Organization's alcohol-based handrubs: impact of changes in key ingredient levels and test parameters.世界卫生组织基于酒精的手部消毒剂制剂 I 的杀病毒活性:关键成分水平和测试参数变化的影响。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2013 Dec 12;2(1):34. doi: 10.1186/2047-2994-2-34.
6
Community-based infections and the potential role of common touch surfaces as vectors for the transmission of infectious agents in home and community settings.社区感染以及常见接触表面在家庭和社区环境中作为传染性病原体传播媒介的潜在作用。
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Nov;41(11):1087-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.05.014. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
7
Analysis of alcohol-based hand sanitizer delivery systems: efficacy of foam, gel, and wipes against influenza A (H1N1) virus on hands.分析醇基手部消毒剂输送系统:泡沫、凝胶和湿巾对手上甲型流感(H1N1)病毒的功效。
Am J Infect Control. 2012 Nov;40(9):806-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.10.016. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
8
Skin microbiota: microbial community structure and its potential association with health and disease.皮肤微生物群:微生物群落结构及其与健康和疾病的潜在关联。
Infect Genet Evol. 2011 Jul;11(5):839-48. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.03.022. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
9
The effect of handwashing with water or soap on bacterial contamination of hands.用清水或肥皂洗手对手部细菌污染的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Jan;8(1):97-104. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8010097. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
10
Effect of hand hygiene on infectious disease risk in the community setting: a meta-analysis.社区环境中手部卫生对传染病风险的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Public Health. 2008 Aug;98(8):1372-81. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.124610. Epub 2008 Jun 12.