• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信任博弈、调查信任,它们相关吗?来自中国的证据。

Trust game, survey trust, are they correlated? Evidence from China.

作者信息

Tang Yujie, Gong Zhe

机构信息

College of Psychology, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China.

Present Address: Sichuan Key Laboratory of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Key Laboratory of Psychology and Behavior of Discipline Inspection and Supervision, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Curr Psychol. 2023 Mar 9:1-11. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04448-w.

DOI:10.1007/s12144-023-04448-w
PMID:37359700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9995730/
Abstract

Trust Game and survey trust are the two most popular measurements in the field of trust research, but most studies conducted in developing countries have found low or even insignificant correlations between them, we therefore validated this phenomenon in the cultural context of the largest developing country, China. Within-country differences can be of the same magnitude as the between country differences, especially in a culturally diverse China. Thus, we focus on comparing the characteristics of trust in the South and North regions of China. Through zero-order correlation and hierarchical regression analysis, our findings are consistent with those of numerous developing countries: Trust Game is lowly correlated with in-group trust survey and not with out-group trust survey. On the other hand, we found that Chinese individuals exhibit a distinct pattern of in-group trust, and there is no fundamental difference in the characteristics of trust between the South and the North.

摘要

信任博弈和调查信任是信任研究领域中最常用的两种测量方法,但大多数在发展中国家进行的研究发现,它们之间的相关性很低,甚至微不足道。因此,我们在中国这个最大的发展中国家的文化背景下验证了这一现象。国内差异可能与国家间差异一样大,尤其是在中国这样一个文化多元的国家。因此,我们着重比较中国南方和北方地区的信任特征。通过零阶相关分析和分层回归分析,我们的研究结果与众多发展中国家的研究结果一致:信任博弈与内群体信任调查的相关性较低,与外群体信任调查则无相关性。另一方面,我们发现中国个体在内群体信任方面呈现出独特的模式,而且南方和北方在信任特征上没有根本差异。

相似文献

1
Trust game, survey trust, are they correlated? Evidence from China.信任博弈、调查信任,它们相关吗?来自中国的证据。
Curr Psychol. 2023 Mar 9:1-11. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04448-w.
2
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.公共部门改革及其对腐败程度的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Personality impressions predict intergroup trust behaviour of Southern Chinese.个性印象预测了中国南方人群体间信任行为。
Int J Psychol. 2022 Dec;57(6):735-742. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12868. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
4
Understanding the determinants of public trust in the health care system in China: an analysis of a cross-sectional survey.了解中国民众对医疗保健系统信任的决定因素:一项横断面调查分析。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2019 Jan;24(1):37-43. doi: 10.1177/1355819618799113. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
5
How Does Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment Respond to Host Country Cultural Tolerance and Trust?中国对外直接投资如何回应东道国的文化宽容与信任?
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 11;13:794455. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.794455. eCollection 2022.
6
Outward specific trust in the balancing of hierarchical government trust: Evidence from mainland China.对外在特定信任与层级政府信任平衡的考察:来自中国大陆的证据。
Br J Sociol. 2021 Jun;72(3):774-792. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12798. Epub 2020 Dec 20.
7
The influencing factors of game brand loyalty.游戏品牌忠诚度的影响因素。
Heliyon. 2024 May 17;10(10):e31324. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31324. eCollection 2024 May 30.
8
Perceived Needs Versus Predisposing/Enabling Characteristics in Relation to Internet Cancer Information Seeking Among the US and Chinese Public: Comparative Survey Research.感知需求与美国和中国公众互联网癌症信息搜索相关的倾向/促成因素:比较调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):e24733. doi: 10.2196/24733.
9
[Trust and cooperation: a comparison of in-group preference and trust behavior between American and Japanese students].信任与合作:美国和日本学生的内群体偏好与信任行为比较
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2004 Oct;75(4):308-15. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.75.308.
10
Social trust, interpersonal trust and self-rated health in China: a multi-level study.中国的社会信任、人际信任与自评健康:一项多层次研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Nov 8;15(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0469-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of financial goal pursuit on trust and trustworthiness among Chinese college students: Demographic differentials.追求财务目标对中国大学生信任及可信度的影响:人口统计学差异
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 12;13(1):904. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03274-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Variability in repeated economic games: comparing trust game decisions to other social trust measures.重复经济博弈中的变异性:将信任博弈决策与其他社会信任度量进行比较。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Sep 21;9(9):210213. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210213. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Emerging evidence of cultural differences linked to rice versus wheat agriculture.与水稻和小麦农业相关的文化差异的新证据。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Apr;32:81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.031. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
3
Farming cultivates a community-level shared culture through collective activities: Examining contextual effects with multilevel analyses.农业通过集体活动培育社区层面的共享文化:使用多层次分析检验情境效应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Jan;116(1):1-14. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000138. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
4
Functional connectivity of specific resting-state networks predicts trust and reciprocity in the trust game.特定静息态网络的功能连接可预测信任游戏中的信任和互惠。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Feb;19(1):165-176. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-00654-3.
5
Personal trust extends cooperation beyond trustees: A Mexican study.个人信任将合作扩展到受托人之外:一项墨西哥研究。
Int J Psychol. 2019 Oct;54(5):687-704. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12500. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
6
The dynamics of punishment and trust.惩罚与信任的动态关系。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Oct;102(10):1385-1402. doi: 10.1037/apl0000178. Epub 2017 May 4.
7
Love Thy Neighbor? Ethnoracial Diversity and Trust Reexamined.爱你的邻居?对种族多样性与信任的重新审视。
AJS. 2015 Nov;121(3):722-82. doi: 10.1086/683144.
8
Adolescent trust and trustworthiness: role of gender and social value orientation.青少年的信任与可信度:性别及社会价值取向的作用
J Adolesc. 2014 Dec;37(8):1379-86. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.09.014.
9
Trust at zero acquaintance: more a matter of respect than expectation of reward.零熟悉度下的信任:更多是出于尊重而非期望回报。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jul;107(1):122-41. doi: 10.1037/a0036673. Epub 2014 May 12.
10
Large-scale psychological differences within China explained by rice versus wheat agriculture.中国内部存在大规模的心理差异,可以用水稻和小麦农业来解释。
Science. 2014 May 9;344(6184):603-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1246850.