• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对土地的“顽固物质性”:农地资产化中想象、数据与数字技术的相互作用

Tackling land's 'stubborn materiality': the interplay of imaginaries, data and digital technologies within farmland assetization.

作者信息

Sippel Sarah Ruth

机构信息

Geography Department, University of Münster, Heisenbergstr. 2, 48149 Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Agric Human Values. 2023 May 1:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10460-023-10453-3.

DOI:10.1007/s10460-023-10453-3
PMID:37359848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10150681/
Abstract

The nature of farming is - still - an essentially biological, and thus volatile, system, which poses substantial challenges to its integration into financialized capitalism. Financial investors often seek stability and predictability of returns that are hardly compatible with agriculture - but which are increasingly seen as achievable through data and digital farming technologies. This paper investigates how farmland investment brokers engage with, perceive, and produce farming data for their investors within a co-constructive process. Tackling land's 'stubborn materiality' for investment, I argue, has material and immaterial components: it includes the re-imagination of farming as a financial asset that delivers reliable income streams for investors; and the re-engineering of farmland's concrete materialities with digital farming technologies. Farmland investment brokers develop investor-suitable farmland imaginaries, underpinned by storytelling as well as the calculative 'evidence' of (digital) data. At the same time, digital technologies have become a key tool for transforming farms into 'investment grade assets' endowed with the rich data on farm performance and financial returns requested by investors. I conclude that the assetization and digitization of farmland need to be seen as closely intertwined and mutually reinforcing processes and identify key areas for future research on this intersection.

摘要

农业的本质仍然是一个基本的生物系统,因此具有波动性,这给将其融入金融化资本主义带来了巨大挑战。金融投资者通常追求回报的稳定性和可预测性,而这与农业很难兼容——但人们越来越认为通过数据和数字农业技术可以实现这些目标。本文研究了农田投资经纪人如何在一个共同构建的过程中与投资者互动、理解并为其生成农业数据。我认为,为了投资而应对土地的“顽固物质性”,有物质和非物质两个组成部分:它包括将农业重新想象为一种能为投资者带来可靠收入流的金融资产;以及利用数字农业技术对农田的具体物质特性进行重新设计。农田投资经纪人通过讲故事以及(数字)数据的计算性“证据”,构建出适合投资者的农田想象。与此同时,数字技术已成为将农场转变为“投资级资产”的关键工具,这些资产拥有投资者所要求的关于农场绩效和财务回报的丰富数据。我得出结论,农田的资产化和数字化需要被视为紧密交织、相互促进的过程,并确定了关于这一交叉领域未来研究的关键领域。

相似文献

1
Tackling land's 'stubborn materiality': the interplay of imaginaries, data and digital technologies within farmland assetization.应对土地的“顽固物质性”:农地资产化中想象、数据与数字技术的相互作用
Agric Human Values. 2023 May 1:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10460-023-10453-3.
2
Constructing agri-food for finance: startups, venture capital and food future imaginaries.为金融构建农业食品:初创企业、风险投资与食品未来想象
Agric Human Values. 2023;40(2):475-488. doi: 10.1007/s10460-022-10383-6. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
3
Non-Farm Employment, Farmland Renting and Farming Ability: Evidence from China.非农就业、农地租赁与务农能力:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 30;19(9):5476. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095476.
4
Assetization and the 'new asset geographies'.资产化与“新资产地理格局”
Dialogues Hum Geogr. 2024 Mar;14(1):9-29. doi: 10.1177/20438206221130807. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
5
Running out of farmland? Investment discourses, unstable land values and the sluggishness of asset making.耕地告急?投资话语、土地价值不稳定与资产创造的迟缓
Agric Human Values. 2017;34(1):185-198. doi: 10.1007/s10460-015-9679-7. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
6
Immaterial animals and financialized forests: Asset manager capitalism, ESG integration and the politics of livestock.非物质化动物与金融化森林:资产管理资本主义、环境、社会和公司治理整合与畜牧业政治
Environ Plan A. 2022 Nov;54(8):1551-1568. doi: 10.1177/0308518X221121132. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
7
Determinants of Farmland Abandonment on the Urban-Rural Fringe.城乡边缘区耕地撂荒的决定因素。
Environ Manage. 2020 Mar;65(3):369-384. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01258-9. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
8
Beyond divest vs. engage: a review of the role of institutional investors in an inclusive fossil fuel phase-out.超越撤资与参与:机构投资者在包容性化石燃料淘汰中的作用综述
Clim Policy. 2023 Oct 12;24(3):314-331. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2023.2261900. eCollection 2024.
9
Farmland Transfer, Social Security, and Households' Productive Investment: Based on China's CFPS Survey.农地流转、社会保障与农户生产性投资——基于中国 CFPS 调查数据
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 4;19(17):11082. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711082.
10
Can digital farming technologies enhance the willingness to buy products from current farming systems?数字农业技术能否提高从当前农业系统购买产品的意愿?
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 14;17(11):e0277731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277731. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Assetization and the 'new asset geographies'.资产化与“新资产地理格局”
Dialogues Hum Geogr. 2024 Mar;14(1):9-29. doi: 10.1177/20438206221130807. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
2
Reflexive expectations in innovation financing: An analysis of venture capital as a mode of valuation.创新融资中的反射性预期:风险投资作为一种估值模式的分析。
Soc Stud Sci. 2023 Feb;53(1):29-48. doi: 10.1177/03063127221118372. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
3
New but for whom? Discourses of innovation in precision agriculture.新事物,但为了谁?精准农业中的创新话语。
Agric Human Values. 2021;38(4):1181-1199. doi: 10.1007/s10460-021-10244-8. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
4
Agri-food tech discovers silver linings in the pandemic.农业食品科技在疫情中发现一线希望。
Agric Human Values. 2020;37(3):587-588. doi: 10.1007/s10460-020-10052-6. Epub 2020 May 13.
5
Running out of farmland? Investment discourses, unstable land values and the sluggishness of asset making.耕地告急?投资话语、土地价值不稳定与资产创造的迟缓
Agric Human Values. 2017;34(1):185-198. doi: 10.1007/s10460-015-9679-7. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
6
Rethinking in the Bio-economy: Finance, Assetization, and the Management of Value.生物经济中的反思:金融、资产化与价值管理
Sci Technol Human Values. 2017 May;42(3):460-490. doi: 10.1177/0162243916661633. Epub 2016 Aug 10.