• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情与收入不平等:来自月度人口登记册的证据

COVID-19 and income inequality: evidence from monthly population registers.

作者信息

Angelov Nikolay, Waldenström Daniel

机构信息

The Swedish Tax Agency, Sundbyberg, Sweden.

Uppsala Center for Fiscal Studies (UCFS), Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

J Econ Inequal. 2023 Mar 15:1-29. doi: 10.1007/s10888-022-09560-8.

DOI:10.1007/s10888-022-09560-8
PMID:37360569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10015130/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

We measure the distributional impact of the COVID-19 pandemic using newly released population register data in Sweden. Monthly earnings inequality increased during the pandemic, and the key driver is income losses among low-paid individuals while middle- and high-income earners were almost unaffected. In terms of employment, as measured by having positive monthly earnings, the pandemic had a larger negative impact on private-sector workers and on women. In terms of earnings conditional on being employed, the effect was still more negative for women, but less negative for private-sector workers compared to publicly employed. Using data on individual take-up of government COVID-19 support, we show that policy significantly dampened the inequality increase, but did not fully offset it. Annual total market income inequality, which also includes capital income and taxable transfers, shows similar patterns of increasing inequality during the pandemic.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10888-022-09560-8.

摘要

未标注

我们利用瑞典新发布的人口登记数据来衡量新冠疫情的分配影响。疫情期间月收入不平等加剧,关键驱动因素是低薪个体的收入损失,而中高收入者几乎未受影响。在就业方面,以月收入为正来衡量,疫情对私营部门工人和女性的负面影响更大。在就业条件下的收入方面,女性受到的影响仍然更大,但与公共部门就业人员相比,私营部门工人受到的负面影响较小。利用关于个人领取政府新冠疫情支持的数据,我们表明政策显著抑制了不平等加剧,但并未完全抵消。年度总市场收入不平等,其中还包括资本收入和应税转移支付,在疫情期间也呈现出类似的不平等加剧模式。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10888-022-09560-8获取的补充材料。

相似文献

1
COVID-19 and income inequality: evidence from monthly population registers.新冠疫情与收入不平等:来自月度人口登记册的证据
J Econ Inequal. 2023 Mar 15:1-29. doi: 10.1007/s10888-022-09560-8.
2
Distributional impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic and the CARES Act.新冠疫情和《新冠病毒援助、救济和经济安全法案》的分配影响。
J Econ Inequal. 2023 Apr 24:1-25. doi: 10.1007/s10888-022-09552-8.
3
Lifetime earnings patterns, the distribution of future Social Security benefits, and the impact of pension reform.终身收入模式、未来社会保障福利的分配以及养老金改革的影响。
Soc Secur Bull. 2000;63(4):74-98.
4
The Unequal Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Labour Market and Income Inequality in China: A Multisectoral CGE Model Analysis Coupled with a Micro-Simulation Approach.新冠疫情对中国劳动力市场和收入不平等的非均等影响:一个与微观模拟方法相结合的多部门 CGE 模型分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 25;19(3):1320. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031320.
5
The Income Gradient in Mortality during the Covid-19 Crisis: Evidence from Belgium.新冠疫情危机期间死亡率的收入梯度:来自比利时的证据。
J Econ Inequal. 2021;19(3):551-570. doi: 10.1007/s10888-021-09505-7. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
6
Comparing replacement rates under private and federal retirement systems.比较私人退休制度和联邦退休制度下的替代率。
Soc Secur Bull. 2003;65(1):17-25.
7
The impact of COVID-19 on households´ income in the EU.新冠疫情对欧盟家庭收入的影响。
J Econ Inequal. 2021;19(3):413-431. doi: 10.1007/s10888-021-09485-8. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
8
Will COVID-19 Have Long-Lasting Effects on Inequality? Evidence from Past Pandemics.新冠疫情会对不平等现象产生长期影响吗?来自以往大流行病的证据。
J Econ Inequal. 2022;20(4):811-839. doi: 10.1007/s10888-022-09540-y. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
9
The fall in income inequality during COVID-19 in four European countries.四个欧洲国家在新冠疫情期间收入不平等现象的下降。
J Econ Inequal. 2021;19(3):489-507. doi: 10.1007/s10888-021-09499-2. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
10
Lifetime distributional effects of Social Security retirement benefits.社会保障退休福利的终身分配效应。
Soc Secur Bull. 2003;65(1):33-61.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Income and Well-Being Inequality During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan.日本新冠疫情期间的收入与福祉不平等趋势
Soc Indic Res. 2024 Dec 21. doi: 10.1007/s11205-024-03478-6.
2
SOS incomes: simulated effects of COVID-19 and emergency benefits on individual and household income distribution in Italy.特别救助收入:新冠疫情及紧急救助对意大利个人和家庭收入分配的模拟影响
J Eur Soc Policy. 2023 Feb;33(1):101-116. doi: 10.1177/09589287221115672.
3
Income inequality and pandemics: insights from HIV/AIDS and COVID-19-a multicountry observational study.收入不平等与大流行病:来自艾滋病毒/艾滋病和 COVID-19 的启示——一项多国观察性研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Sep;8(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013703.
4
Job loss and job instability during the COVID-19 pandemic and the risk of depression and anxiety among Swedish employees.新冠疫情期间瑞典员工的失业与工作不稳定状况以及抑郁和焦虑风险
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Jun;22:101424. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101424. Epub 2023 May 4.
5
COVID-19 and organisational resilience in Brazil's water sector.巴西水行业的 COVID-19 与组织弹性。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Nov 20;848:157637. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157637. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
6
Inequality, public health, and COVID-19: an analysis of the Spanish case by municipalities.不平等、公共卫生与 COVID-19:对西班牙各市镇案例的分析
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Feb;24(1):99-110. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01455-9. Epub 2022 Mar 9.