• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情对欧盟家庭收入的影响。

The impact of COVID-19 on households´ income in the EU.

作者信息

Almeida Vanda, Barrios Salvador, Christl Michael, De Poli Silvia, Tumino Alberto, van der Wielen Wouter

机构信息

European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC-Seville), Edificio Expo, Calle Inca Garcilaso, 3, 41092 Seville, Spain.

Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex, UK.

出版信息

J Econ Inequal. 2021;19(3):413-431. doi: 10.1007/s10888-021-09485-8. Epub 2021 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10888-021-09485-8
PMID:34093098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8167381/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

This analysis makes use of economic forecasts for 2020 issued by the European Commission in Autumn 2019 and Spring 2020, and of a counterfactual under a no-policy change assumption, to analyse the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on EU households´ income. Additionally, our analysis assesses the cushioning effect of discretionary fiscal policy measures taken by the EU Member States. We find that the COVID-19 pandemic is likely to affect significantly households' disposable income in the EU, with lower income households being more severely hit. However, our results show that due to policy intervention, the impact of the crisis is expected to be similar to the one experienced during the 2008-2009 financial crisis. In detail, our results indicate that discretionary fiscal policy measures will play a significant cushioning role, reducing the size of the income loss (from -9.3% to -4.3% for the average equivalised disposable income), its regressivity and mitigating the poverty impact of the pandemic. We conclude that policy interventions are therefore instrumental in cushioning against the impact of the crisis on inequality and poverty.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10888-021-09485-8.

摘要

未标注

本分析利用了欧盟委员会在2019年秋季和2020年春季发布的2020年经济预测,以及在无政策变化假设下的反事实情况,以分析新冠疫情危机对欧盟家庭收入的影响。此外,我们的分析评估了欧盟成员国采取的自由裁量财政政策措施的缓冲作用。我们发现,新冠疫情可能会对欧盟家庭的可支配收入产生重大影响,低收入家庭受到的冲击更为严重。然而,我们的结果表明,由于政策干预,危机的影响预计将与2008 - 2009年金融危机期间的情况类似。具体而言,我们的结果表明,自由裁量财政政策措施将发挥显著的缓冲作用,减少收入损失的规模(平均等价可支配收入从-9.3%降至-4.3%),降低其累退性,并减轻疫情对贫困的影响。我们得出结论,因此政策干预对于缓冲危机对不平等和贫困的影响至关重要。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10888-021-09485-8获取的补充材料。

相似文献

1
The impact of COVID-19 on households´ income in the EU.新冠疫情对欧盟家庭收入的影响。
J Econ Inequal. 2021;19(3):413-431. doi: 10.1007/s10888-021-09485-8. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
2
Did the UK policy response to Covid-19 protect household incomes?英国针对新冠疫情的政策应对措施是否保护了家庭收入?
J Econ Inequal. 2021;19(3):433-458. doi: 10.1007/s10888-021-09491-w. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
3
The COVID-19 resilience of a continental welfare regime - nowcasting the distributional impact of the crisis.大陆福利制度对新冠疫情的抵御能力——对危机的分布影响进行现况预测。
J Econ Inequal. 2022;20(4):777-809. doi: 10.1007/s10888-021-09524-4. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
4
The role of short-time work and discretionary policy measures in mitigating the effects of the COVID-19 crisis in Germany.短期工作及酌情采取的政策措施在缓解德国新冠疫情危机影响方面的作用。
Int Tax Public Financ. 2022 May 23:1-30. doi: 10.1007/s10797-022-09738-w.
5
COVID-19 and (gender) inequality in income: the impact of discretionary policy measures in Austria.新冠疫情与收入方面的(性别)不平等:奥地利自由裁量政策措施的影响
Swiss J Econ Stat. 2022;158(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41937-022-00084-6. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
6
Distributional effects of macroeconomic shocks in real-time: A novel method applied to the COVID-19 crisis in Germany.实时宏观经济冲击的分配效应:一种应用于德国新冠疫情危机的新方法。
J Econ Inequal. 2021;19(3):459-487. doi: 10.1007/s10888-021-09489-4. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
7
COVID-19 and income inequality: evidence from monthly population registers.新冠疫情与收入不平等:来自月度人口登记册的证据
J Econ Inequal. 2023 Mar 15:1-29. doi: 10.1007/s10888-022-09560-8.
8
The fall in income inequality during COVID-19 in four European countries.四个欧洲国家在新冠疫情期间收入不平等现象的下降。
J Econ Inequal. 2021;19(3):489-507. doi: 10.1007/s10888-021-09499-2. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
9
Modelling the Distributional Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis.模拟新冠疫情危机的分布影响。
Fisc Stud. 2020 Jun;41(2):321-336. doi: 10.1111/1475-5890.12231. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
10
The Role of Automatic Stabilizers and Emergency Tax-Benefit Policies During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Ecuador.自动稳定器和紧急税收福利政策在新冠疫情期间的作用:来自厄瓜多尔的证据
Eur J Dev Res. 2022;34(6):2787-2809. doi: 10.1057/s41287-021-00490-1. Epub 2021 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Income and Well-Being Inequality During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan.日本新冠疫情期间的收入与福祉不平等趋势
Soc Indic Res. 2024 Dec 21. doi: 10.1007/s11205-024-03478-6.
2
The influence of social interactions in mitigating psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: a study in Sri Lanka.社交互动对缓解新冠疫情期间心理困扰的影响:斯里兰卡的一项研究
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 6;15:1491805. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1491805. eCollection 2024.
3
Public health events and economic growth in a neoclassical framework.新古典框架下的公共卫生事件与经济增长
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 28;24(1):1724. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19106-4.
4
Pandemic Fatigue and Preferences for COVID-19 Public Health and Social Measures in China: Nationwide Discrete Choice Experiment.大流行疲劳与对中国 COVID-19 公共卫生和社会措施的偏好:全国离散选择试验。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jun 27;10:e45840. doi: 10.2196/45840.
5
Has food security in the EU countries worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic? Analysis of physical and economic access to food.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,欧盟国家的食品安全状况是否恶化?对食品实物和经济获取途径的分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 17;19(4):e0302072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302072. eCollection 2024.
6
SOS incomes: simulated effects of COVID-19 and emergency benefits on individual and household income distribution in Italy.特别救助收入:新冠疫情及紧急救助对意大利个人和家庭收入分配的模拟影响
J Eur Soc Policy. 2023 Feb;33(1):101-116. doi: 10.1177/09589287221115672.
7
COVID-19 incidence of poverty: How has disease affected the cost of purchasing food in Pakistan.新冠疫情下的贫困发生率:疾病如何影响巴基斯坦的食品采购成本。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Oct 14;36:102477. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102477. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Catastrophic health care spending in managing type 2 diabetes before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前及期间管理2型糖尿病的灾难性医疗支出。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Aug 22;3(8):e0002180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002180. eCollection 2023.
9
Experiences of aftermath of COVID-19 in relation to social, financial and health related aspects among previously hospitalized patients: a qualitative exploration.COVID-19 后经历与先前住院患者社会、财务和健康相关方面的关系:定性探索。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 15;11:1196810. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1196810. eCollection 2023.
10
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on health service utilisation and household economy of pregnant and postpartum women: a cross-sectional study from rural Sri Lanka.COVID-19 大流行对孕妇和产后妇女的卫生服务利用和家庭经济的影响:来自斯里兰卡农村的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 29;13(5):e070214. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070214.

本文引用的文献

1
THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF COVID-19: EVIDENCE FROM A NEW PUBLIC DATABASE BUILT USING PRIVATE SECTOR DATA.新冠疫情的经济影响:来自利用私营部门数据构建的新公共数据库的证据。
Q J Econ. 2024 May;139(2):829-889. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjad048. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
2
The distributional impact of recessions: The global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic recession.衰退的分配影响:全球金融危机与新冠疫情衰退
J Econ Bus. 2021 May-Jun;115:105971. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2020.105971. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
3
COVID-19 doesn't need lockdowns to destroy jobs: The effect of local outbreaks in Korea.新冠疫情无需封锁措施就能导致就业岗位减少:韩国局部疫情的影响。
Labour Econ. 2021 Jun;70:101993. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2021.101993. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
4
Twin Peaks: Covid-19 and the labor market.双峰:新冠疫情与劳动力市场
Eur Econ Rev. 2021 Sep;138:103828. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103828. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
5
Did the UK policy response to Covid-19 protect household incomes?英国针对新冠疫情的政策应对措施是否保护了家庭收入?
J Econ Inequal. 2021;19(3):433-458. doi: 10.1007/s10888-021-09491-w. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
6
Which workers bear the burden of social distancing?哪些劳动者承担着社交距离的负担?
J Econ Inequal. 2021;19(3):509-526. doi: 10.1007/s10888-021-09487-6. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
7
The Challenges for Labour Market Policy during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间劳动力市场政策面临的挑战
Fisc Stud. 2020 Jun;41(2):371-382. doi: 10.1111/1475-5890.12233. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
8
Modelling the Distributional Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis.模拟新冠疫情危机的分布影响。
Fisc Stud. 2020 Jun;41(2):321-336. doi: 10.1111/1475-5890.12231. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
9
COVID-19 and Ethnic Inequalities in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士的新冠疫情与种族不平等现象
Fisc Stud. 2020 Jun;41(2):259-289. doi: 10.1111/1475-5890.12228. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
10
Wage inequality and poverty effects of lockdown and social distancing in Europe.欧洲封锁和社交距离措施对工资不平等及贫困的影响。
Eur Econ Rev. 2020 Oct;129:103564. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103564. Epub 2020 Aug 11.