• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测(相对)家庭虐待与警方风险评估。

Predicting Domestic Abuse (Fairly) and Police Risk Assessment.

作者信息

Turner Emily, Brown Gavin, Medina-Ariza Juanjo

机构信息

University of Manchester UK University of Manchester, UK.

University of Seville Seville Spain University of Seville, Spain.

出版信息

Psychosoc Interv. 2022 Jul 20;31(3):145-157. doi: 10.5093/pi2022a11. eCollection 2022 Jul.

DOI:10.5093/pi2022a11
PMID:37361012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10268549/
Abstract

Domestic abuse victim risk assessment is crucial for providing victims with the correct level of support. However, it has been shown that the approach currently taken by most UK police forces, the Domestic Abuse, Stalking, and Honour Based Violence (DASH) risk assessment, is not identifying the most vulnerable victims. Instead, we tested several machine learning algorithms and propose a predictive model, using logistic regression with elastic net as the best performing, that incorporates information readily available in police databases, and census-area-level statistics. We used data from a large UK police force including 350,000 domestic abuse incidents. Our models made significant improvement upon the predictive capacity of DASH, both for intimate partner violence (IPV; AUC = .748) and other forms of domestic abuse (non-IPV; AUC = .763). The most influential variables in the model were of the categories criminal history and domestic abuse history, particularly time since the last incident. We show that the DASH questions contributed almost nothing to the predictive performance. We also provide an overview of model fairness performance for ethnic and socioeconomic subgroups of the data sample. Although there were disparities between ethnic and demographic subgroups, everyone benefited from the increased accuracy of model-based predictions when compared with officer risk predictions.

摘要

家庭虐待受害者风险评估对于为受害者提供适当水平的支持至关重要。然而,研究表明,英国大多数警察部队目前采用的方法,即家庭虐待、跟踪骚扰和基于荣誉的暴力行为(DASH)风险评估,未能识别出最脆弱的受害者。相反,我们测试了几种机器学习算法,并提出了一个预测模型,该模型使用弹性网络逻辑回归作为表现最佳的模型,纳入了警方数据库中 readily available 的信息以及人口普查区域层面的统计数据。我们使用了来自英国一支大型警察部队的数据,其中包括35万起家庭虐待事件。我们的模型在亲密伴侣暴力(IPV;AUC = 0.748)和其他形式的家庭虐待(非IPV;AUC = 0.763)的预测能力方面比DASH有了显著提高。模型中最具影响力的变量属于犯罪历史和家庭虐待历史类别,特别是自上一次事件以来的时间。我们表明,DASH问题对预测性能几乎没有贡献。我们还概述了数据样本中种族和社会经济亚组的模型公平性表现。尽管种族和人口亚组之间存在差异,但与警官风险预测相比,每个人都从基于模型的预测准确性提高中受益。

相似文献

1
Predicting Domestic Abuse (Fairly) and Police Risk Assessment.预测(相对)家庭虐待与警方风险评估。
Psychosoc Interv. 2022 Jul 20;31(3):145-157. doi: 10.5093/pi2022a11. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
The 'officer effect' in risk assessment for domestic abuse: Findings from a mixed methods study in England and Wales.家庭虐待风险评估中的“官员效应”:英格兰和威尔士一项混合方法研究的结果
Eur J Criminol. 2023 May;20(3):856-877. doi: 10.1177/14773708231156331. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
3
Reversing the historical tide of iatrogenic harm: A therapeutic jurisprudence analysis of increases in arrests of domestic batterers and rapists.扭转医源性伤害的历史潮流:对增加逮捕家庭暴力犯和强奸犯的治疗法学分析。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2010 Nov-Dec;33(5-6):306-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.09.003. Epub 2010 Nov 9.
4
Intimate Partner Violence and Pet Abuse: Responding Law Enforcement Officers' Observations and Victim Reports From the Scene.亲密伴侣暴力与虐待宠物:执法人员现场观察及受害者报告
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Mar;36(5-6):2353-2372. doi: 10.1177/0886260518759653. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
5
Same-Sex Intimate Partner Violence in Canada: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Types of Incidents Reported to Police Services.加拿大的同性亲密伴侣暴力行为:向警方报告的事件的发生率、特征及类型
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Dec;36(23-24):10959-10988. doi: 10.1177/0886260519897342. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
6
Insights from linking police domestic abuse data and health data in South Wales, UK: a linked routine data analysis using decision tree classification.英国南威尔士将警务家暴数据与健康数据关联的研究结果:基于决策树分类的关联常规数据分析
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Aug;8(8):e629-e638. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00126-3.
7
Female victims of domestic violence: which victims do police refer to crisis intervention?家庭暴力的女性受害者:警察会将哪些受害者转介至危机干预机构?
Violence Vict. 2007;22(4):463-73. doi: 10.1891/088667007781553991.
8
Characteristics of Intimate Partner Violence Incidents and the Environments in Which They Occur: Victim Reports to Responding Law Enforcement Officers.亲密伴侣暴力事件的特征及其发生环境:受害者向执法人员报案。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Jul;35(13-14):2583-2606. doi: 10.1177/0886260517704230. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
9
Automated Analysis of Domestic Violence Police Reports to Explore Abuse Types and Victim Injuries: Text Mining Study.家庭暴力警方报告的自动化分析以探究虐待类型和受害者伤害情况:文本挖掘研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 12;21(3):e13067. doi: 10.2196/13067.
10
Predictors of Severe Intimate Partner Violence Among Antisocial and Family-Only Perpetrators: Victims' and Offenders' Characteristics.反社会型和仅家庭型施害者中严重亲密伴侣暴力的预测因素:受害者和施害者的特征。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Mar;37(5-6):NP2791-NP2822. doi: 10.1177/0886260520943714. Epub 2020 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Participants in Court-mandated Intervention Programs for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators with Substance Use Problems: A Systematic Review of Specific Risk Factors.针对有物质使用问题的亲密伴侣暴力施暴者的法庭强制干预项目参与者:特定风险因素的系统综述
Psychosoc Interv. 2023 May 26;32(2):89-108. doi: 10.5093/pi2023a7. eCollection 2023 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Pathways to Police Contact for Spousal Violence Survivors: The Role of Individual and Neighborhood Factors in Survivors' Reporting Behaviors.配偶暴力幸存者与警方联系的途径:个体和邻里因素在幸存者报告行为中的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jan;36(1-2):636-662. doi: 10.1177/0886260517729400. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
2
Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction Instruments.公平预测与差异影响:累犯预测工具中的偏见研究。
Big Data. 2017 Jun;5(2):153-163. doi: 10.1089/big.2016.0047.
3
The "Golden Thread": Coercive Control and Risk Assessment for Domestic Violence.
“黄金线索”:家庭暴力的强制性控制和风险评估。
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Nov;34(21-22):4477-4497. doi: 10.1177/0886260516675464. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
4
Measuring coercive control: what can we learn from national population surveys?衡量强制性控制:我们能从全国人口调查中学到什么?
Violence Against Women. 2015 Mar;21(3):355-75. doi: 10.1177/1077801214568032.
5
The average predictive validity of intimate partner violence risk assessment instruments.亲密伴侣暴力风险评估工具的平均预测有效性。
J Interpers Violence. 2013 May;28(7):1537-58. doi: 10.1177/0886260512468250. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
6
Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations.通过除以两个标准差对回归输入进行缩放。
Stat Med. 2008 Jul 10;27(15):2865-73. doi: 10.1002/sim.3107.