Suppr超能文献

衡量强制性控制:我们能从全国人口调查中学到什么?

Measuring coercive control: what can we learn from national population surveys?

作者信息

Myhill Andy

机构信息

College of Policing, UK

出版信息

Violence Against Women. 2015 Mar;21(3):355-75. doi: 10.1177/1077801214568032.

Abstract

Numerous academic studies point to gender symmetry in the prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV). Many of these studies report findings from surveys with small and/or unrepresentative samples that have insufficient questions to differentiate adequately between different types of abuse. Data from a large, nationally representative survey suggest that, while the prevalence of situational violence is fairly symmetrical, coercive controlling abuse is highly gendered, with women overwhelmingly the victims. The authors conclude that more comprehensive measures are required in national surveys that consider a wider range of controlling behaviors as well as the meaning and impact of abuse.

摘要

众多学术研究表明,亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的患病率存在性别对称性。其中许多研究报告的结果来自样本较小和/或缺乏代表性的调查,这些调查的问题不足以充分区分不同类型的虐待行为。一项具有全国代表性的大型调查数据显示,虽然情境暴力的患病率相当对称,但强制性控制型虐待存在高度性别差异,女性是主要受害者。作者得出结论,国家调查需要采取更全面的措施,考虑更广泛的控制行为以及虐待的含义和影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验