Characterization of a new radiochromic film (LD-V1) using mammographic beam qualities.

PURPOSE

Radiochromic film (RCF) is a detector that can obtain a two-dimensional dose distribution with high resolution; it is widely used in medical and industrial fields. Several types of RCFs exist based on their application. The type of RCF mainly used for mammography dose assessment has been discontinued; however, a new type of RCF (LD-V1) has been distributed as a successor. Since the medical use of LD-V1 has rarely been studied, we investigated the response characteristics of LD-V1 in mammography.

METHODS

Measurements were performed using Mo/Mo and Rh/Ag on a Senographe Pristina mammography device (GE, Fairfield, CT, USA). The reference air kerma was measured using a parallel-plate ionization chamber (PPIC) (C-MA, Applied Engineering Inc, Tokyo, Japan). Pieces of LD-V1 film model were irradiated at the same position where the reference air kerma in air was measured by the PPIC. Irradiation was performed using the time scale method based on the load on the equipment. Two methods of irradiation were considered: placing the detector in air and on the phantom. The LD-V1 was scanned five times at 72 dpi in RGB (48 bit) mode using a flatbed scanner (ES-G11000, Seiko Epson Corp, Nagano, Japan) 24 h following irradiation. The response ratio of the reference air kerma and the air kerma obtained from the LD-V1 were compared and examined for each beam quality and air kerma range.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

When the beam quality was altered, the response ratio varied from 0.8 to 1.2 with respect to the measurement value of the PPIC; however, some outliers were observed. Response ratios were highly variable in the low-dose range; however, as the air kerma increased, the ratios approached 1. Thus, LD-V1 does not need calibration for each beam quality used in mammography. LD-V1 enables air kerma evaluation by creating air kerma response curves under certain X-ray conditions used in mammography.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that the dose range be limited to 12 mGy or more to keep the response variation with beam qualities below ±20%. If further measurement is required for reducing the response variation, the dose range should be shifted to a higher dose range.