Institute of Chemistry, University of Miskolc, Egyetemváros A/2, H-3515 Miskolc, Hungary.
Institute of Physics and Materials Science, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Peter Jordan Straße 82, A-1190 Vienna, Austria.
J Phys Chem B. 2023 Jul 13;127(27):6078-6090. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c02976. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
General anesthesia can be caused by various, chemically very different molecules, while several other molecules, many of which are structurally rather similar to them, do not exhibit anesthetic effects at all. To understand the origin of this difference and shed some light on the molecular mechanism of general anesthesia, we report here molecular dynamics simulations of the neat dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) membrane as well as DPPC membranes containing the anesthetics diethyl ether and chloroform and the structurally similar non-anesthetics -pentane and carbon tetrachloride, respectively. To also account for the pressure reversal of anesthesia, these simulations are performed both at 1 bar and at 600 bar. Our results indicate that all solutes considered prefer to stay both in the middle of the membrane and close to the boundary of the hydrocarbon domain, at the vicinity of the crowded region of the polar headgroups. However, this latter preference is considerably stronger for the (weakly polar) anesthetics than for the (apolar) non-anesthetics. Anesthetics staying in this outer preferred position increase the lateral separation between the lipid molecules, giving rise to a decrease of the lateral density. The lower lateral density leads to an increased mobility of the DPPC molecules, a decreased order of their tails, an increase of the free volume around this outer preferred position, and a decrease of the lateral pressure at the hydrocarbon side of the apolar/polar interface, a change that might well be in a causal relation with the occurrence of the anesthetic effect. All these changes are clearly reverted by the increase of pressure. Furthermore, non-anesthetics occur in this outer preferred position in a considerably smaller concentration and hence either induce such changes in a much weaker form or do not induce them at all.
全身麻醉可以由各种化学性质差异很大的分子引起,而其他一些分子,其中许多在结构上与它们非常相似,根本没有表现出麻醉作用。为了了解这种差异的起源,并对全身麻醉的分子机制有所了解,我们在此报告了纯二棕榈酰磷脂酰胆碱(DPPC)膜以及含有麻醉剂二乙醚和氯仿以及结构相似的非麻醉剂正戊烷和四氯化碳的 DPPC 膜的分子动力学模拟。为了说明麻醉的压力反转,这些模拟分别在 1 巴和 600 巴下进行。我们的结果表明,所有考虑的溶质都更喜欢同时存在于膜的中间和靠近烃域边界,靠近极性头基的拥挤区域。然而,与非麻醉剂相比,这种偏好对于(弱极性)麻醉剂来说要强得多。停留在这个外部优先位置的麻醉剂会增加脂质分子之间的横向分离,从而导致横向密度降低。较低的横向密度会导致 DPPC 分子的流动性增加,尾部的有序性降低,围绕这个外部优先位置的自由体积增加,以及非极性/极性界面烃侧的横向压力降低,这种变化很可能与麻醉效应的发生有关。所有这些变化都可以通过压力的增加来明显逆转。此外,非麻醉剂在这个外部优先位置的浓度较低,因此要么以较弱的形式诱导这些变化,要么根本不诱导这些变化。