Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 27;18(6):e0287553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287553. eCollection 2023.
Little is known about the impact of mandated vaccination policies on the primary care clinic workforce in the United States or differences between rural and urban settings, especially for COVID-19. With the continued pandemic and an anticipated increase in novel disease outbreaks and emerging vaccines, healthcare systems need additional information on how vaccine mandates impact the healthcare workforce to aid in future decision-making.
We conducted a cross-sectional survey of Oregon primary care clinic staff between October 28, 2021- November 18, 2021, following implementation of a COVID-19 vaccination mandate for healthcare personnel. The survey consisted of 19 questions that assessed the clinic-level impacts of the vaccination mandate. Outcomes included job loss among staff, receipt of an approved vaccination waiver, new vaccination among staff, and the perceived significance of the policy on clinic staffing. We used univariable descriptive statistics to compare outcomes between rural and urban clinics. The survey also included three open-ended questions that were analyzed using a template analysis approach.
Staff from 80 clinics across 28 counties completed surveys, representing 38 rural and 42 urban clinics. Clinics reported job loss (46%), use of vaccination waivers (51%), and newly vaccinated staff (60%). Significantly more rural clinics (compared to urban) utilized medical and/or religious vaccination waivers (71% vs 33%, p = 0.04) and reported significant impact on clinic staffing (45% vs 21%, p = 0.048). There was also a non-significant trend toward more job loss for rural compared to urban clinics (53% vs. 41%, p = 0.547). Qualitative analysis highlighted a decline in clinic morale, small but meaningful detriments to patient care, and mixed opinions of the vaccination mandate.
Oregon's COVID-19 vaccination mandate increased healthcare personnel vaccination rates, yet amplified staffing challenges with disproportionate impacts in rural areas. Staffing impacts in primary care clinics were greater than reported previously in hospital settings and with other vaccination mandates. Mitigating primary care staffing impacts, particularly in rural areas, will be critical in response to the continued pandemic and novel viruses in the future.
对于美国的强制性疫苗接种政策对初级保健诊所劳动力的影响,或者农村和城市环境之间的差异,人们知之甚少,特别是对于 COVID-19 而言。随着大流行的持续以及预计新的疾病爆发和新疫苗的出现,医疗保健系统需要更多有关疫苗接种政策如何影响医疗保健劳动力的信息,以帮助未来的决策。
我们于 2021 年 10 月 28 日至 11 月 18 日在俄勒冈州的初级保健诊所工作人员中进行了一项横断面调查,该调查是在医疗保健人员 COVID-19 疫苗接种强制令实施之后进行的。该调查由 19 个问题组成,评估了疫苗接种强制令对诊所的影响。结果包括工作人员失业,获得批准的疫苗接种豁免,工作人员新接种疫苗以及政策对诊所人员配备的重要性。我们使用单变量描述性统计数据比较了农村和城市诊所之间的结果。调查还包括三个开放性问题,这些问题使用模板分析方法进行了分析。
来自 28 个县的 80 个诊所的工作人员完成了调查,其中包括 38 个农村诊所和 42 个城市诊所。诊所报告称,有 46%的员工失业,有 51%的员工使用疫苗接种豁免,有 60%的员工新接种了疫苗。与城市诊所相比,农村诊所(与城市诊所相比)明显更多地使用医疗和/或宗教疫苗接种豁免(71%比 33%,p = 0.04),并报告对诊所人员配备有重大影响(45%比 21%,p = 0.048)。农村诊所的失业人数也有增加的趋势,但无统计学意义(53%比 41%,p = 0.547)。定性分析突出了诊所士气下降,对患者护理产生了较小但有意义的影响,以及对疫苗接种强制令的看法不一。
俄勒冈州的 COVID-19 疫苗接种强制令提高了医护人员的疫苗接种率,但在农村地区造成了不成比例的人员配备挑战,从而加剧了人员配备挑战。与医院环境中的报告以及其他疫苗接种强制令相比,初级保健诊所的人员配备影响更大。缓解初级保健人员配备的影响,特别是在农村地区,对于应对持续的大流行和未来的新型病毒至关重要。