Salisbury Laura
University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
This chapter reads Beckett’s notable fascination with what Steven Connor has called ‘slow going’ alongside Rob Nixon’s description of the ‘slow violence’ of climate breakdown. Following Nixon’s suggestion that ‘slow violence’ does not register readily in narrative models concerned with spectacular events and the tempos and logics of crisis, I examine Beckett’s attention to what remains in a paradoxically stuck and ongoing time. Suggesting that Beckett’s work sticks with and witnesses catastrophe rather than the temporality of crisis, the chapter uses to explore Beckett’s commitment to staying with a disaster that cannot be overcome, alongside the articulation of a giving up that is not a decision but part of a compulsion or drive to go on. Using Beckett’s interest in Freud’s idea of the death drive, I suggest that Beckett’s later texts work through materialisations of attachment and dependence as a way of thinking with and living with, rather than denying or repressing, the reality of the ‘nothing to be done’.
本章探讨了贝克特对史蒂文·康纳所说的“进展缓慢”的显著痴迷,以及罗布·尼克松对气候崩溃的“缓慢暴力”的描述。遵循尼克松的观点,即“缓慢暴力”在关注壮观事件以及危机的节奏和逻辑的叙事模式中不易显现,我审视了贝克特对处于一种自相矛盾地停滞且持续的时间中所留存之物的关注。本章指出贝克特的作品执着于并见证灾难,而非危机的时间性,运用 来探究贝克特坚持面对无法克服的灾难的决心,以及一种并非出于决定,而是作为继续前行的一种强迫或驱动力一部分的放弃的表达。通过贝克特对弗洛伊德死亡驱力概念的兴趣,我认为贝克特后期的文本通过依恋和依赖的具体表现来进行创作,以此作为与“无计可施”的现实共处并思考的一种方式,而非否认或压抑它。