• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

激光处理与传统愈合基台对种植体周围结缔组织的影响:一项人体临床试验。

Impact on peri-implant connective tissue of laser treated versus traditional healing abutments: a human clinical trials.

机构信息

Human Anatomy and Cell Differentiation Lab, Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University "G.d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Chieti, Italy.

Unit of Prosthodontics, Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Chieti, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jun 27;23(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03148-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-023-03148-y
PMID:37370064
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10294361/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dental implant is the principal treatment for edentulism and the healthiness of the peri-implant tissue has a pivotal role for its longterm success. In addition, it has been shown that also the topography of the healing abutment can influence the outcome of the restoration. The objective of this human clinical trial was to assess the impact of a novel laser-treated healing abutment on peri-implant connective tissue and extracellular matrix proteins compared to the conventional machined surface, which served as the control group.

METHODS

During second surgical stage a customized healing abutment were inserted on 30 single dental implants. Healing abutments were realized with two alternated different surface (two side laser-treated surfaces and two side machined surfaces) in order to be considered both as test and control on the same implant and reduce positioning bias. Following the soft tissue healing period (30 ± 7 days) a 5 mm circular biopsy was retrieved. Immuno-histochemical and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analyses were performed on Collagen, Tenascin C, Fibrillin I, Metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitor (TIMPs). 15 were processed for qPCR, while the other 15 were processed for immunohistochemical analysis. Paired t-test between the two groups were performed. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Results revealed that the connective tissue facing the laser-treated surface expressed statistically significant lower amount of MMPs (p < 0.05) and higher level of TIMPs 3 (p < 0.05), compared to the tissue surrounding the machined implant, which, in turn expressed also altered level of extracellular matrix protein (Tenascin C, Fibrillin I (p < 0.05)) and Collagen V, that are known to be altered also in peri-implantitis.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the laser-treated surface holds promise in positively influencing wound healing of peri-implant connective tissue. Results demonstrated that topographic nature of the healing abutments can positively influence mucosal wound healing and molecular expression. Previous studies have been demonstrated how laser treatment can rightly influence integrity and functionality of the gingiva epithelium and cell adhesion. Regarding connective tissue different molecular expression demonstrated a different inflammatory pattern between laser treated or machined surfaces where laser treated showed better response. Targeted interventions and preventive measures on peri- implant topography could effectively minimize the risk of peri-implant diseases contributing to the long-term success and durability of restoration. However, new studies are mandatory to better understand this phenomenon and the role of this surface in the peri-implantitis process.  TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: (Registration Number: NCT05754970 ). Registered 06/03/2023, retrospectively registered.

摘要

背景

种植牙是治疗无牙颌的主要方法,而种植体周围组织的健康对其长期成功至关重要。此外,已经证明愈合基台的形貌也会影响修复的结果。本项人体临床试验的目的是评估与传统机械加工表面(作为对照组)相比,新型激光处理愈合基台对种植体周围结缔组织和细胞外基质蛋白的影响。

方法

在第二期手术中,将定制的愈合基台插入 30 颗单牙种植体上。愈合基台由两种交替的不同表面(两个侧面激光处理表面和两个侧面机械加工表面)制成,以便在同一种植体上同时考虑测试和对照,减少定位偏差。在软组织愈合期(30±7 天)后,取出 5mm 圆形活检组织。对胶原蛋白、腱糖蛋白 C、原纤维 I、金属蛋白酶(MMPs)及其抑制剂(TIMPs)进行免疫组织化学和实时定量 PCR(qPCR)分析。其中 15 个用于 qPCR,另外 15 个用于免疫组织化学分析。对两组进行配对 t 检验。p 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

结果表明,与机械加工种植体周围组织相比,面向激光处理表面的结缔组织表达的 MMPs 数量统计学上显著降低(p<0.05),TIMP3 水平更高(p<0.05),而机械加工种植体周围组织则表达改变水平的细胞外基质蛋白(腱糖蛋白 C、原纤维 I(p<0.05))和胶原蛋白 V,这些蛋白在种植体周围炎中也被改变。

结论

综上所述,激光处理表面有望对种植体周围结缔组织的伤口愈合产生积极影响。结果表明,愈合基台的形貌可以积极影响黏膜伤口愈合和分子表达。先前的研究已经证明,激光处理可以正确影响牙龈上皮的完整性和功能以及细胞黏附。关于结缔组织,不同的分子表达表明激光处理或机械加工表面之间存在不同的炎症模式,其中激光处理表面表现出更好的反应。针对种植体形貌的靶向干预和预防措施可以有效地降低种植体疾病的风险,从而有助于恢复的长期成功和耐久性。然而,需要进行新的研究以更好地理解这一现象以及该表面在种植体周围炎过程中的作用。

试验注册

本试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符下注册(注册号:NCT05754970)。2023 年 6 月 3 日注册,回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b56e/10294361/56079516b772/12903_2023_3148_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b56e/10294361/ca8297606745/12903_2023_3148_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b56e/10294361/1f2f4ea1ccb4/12903_2023_3148_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b56e/10294361/a81614227ce9/12903_2023_3148_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b56e/10294361/177158c6d05f/12903_2023_3148_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b56e/10294361/f7d7b3cb4a4b/12903_2023_3148_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b56e/10294361/56079516b772/12903_2023_3148_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b56e/10294361/ca8297606745/12903_2023_3148_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b56e/10294361/1f2f4ea1ccb4/12903_2023_3148_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b56e/10294361/a81614227ce9/12903_2023_3148_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b56e/10294361/177158c6d05f/12903_2023_3148_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b56e/10294361/f7d7b3cb4a4b/12903_2023_3148_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b56e/10294361/56079516b772/12903_2023_3148_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact on peri-implant connective tissue of laser treated versus traditional healing abutments: a human clinical trials.激光处理与传统愈合基台对种植体周围结缔组织的影响:一项人体临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jun 27;23(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03148-y.
2
New insights on collagen structural organization and spatial distribution around dental implants: a comparison between machined and laser-treated surfaces.关于牙种植体周围胶原结构组织和空间分布的新见解:机械加工和激光处理表面的比较。
J Transl Med. 2024 Jan 31;22(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-04906-4.
3
Molecular Assessment of Human Peri-implant Mucosal Healing at Laser-Modified and Machined Titanium Abutments.激光改性和机械加工钛基台周围人种植体黏膜愈合的分子评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jul/Aug;33(4):895-904. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6367.
4
Gingival Response to Dental Implant: Comparison Study on the Effects of New Nanopored Laser-Treated vs. Traditional Healing Abutments.牙龈对种植体的反应:新型纳米微孔激光处理与传统愈合基台的效果比较研究。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Aug 22;21(17):6056. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176056.
5
Influence of surface nanotopography and wettability on early phases of peri-implant soft tissue healing: an in-vivo study in dogs.表面纳米形貌和润湿性对种植体周围软组织愈合早期阶段的影响:犬体内研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 8;23(1):651. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03347-7.
6
Influence of abutment macro- and micro-geometry on morphologic and morphometric features of peri-implant connective tissue.基台宏观和微观几何形状对种植体周围结缔组织形态和形态计量学特征的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Sep;34(9):920-933. doi: 10.1111/clr.14118. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
7
Soft tissue response to titanium healing abutments treated by Er: YAG laser or plasma spray: A randomized controlled feasibility clinical study with SEM and histological analysis.铒激光或等离子喷涂处理的钛愈合基台的软组织反应:一项结合扫描电子显微镜和组织学分析的随机对照可行性临床研究
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e13373. doi: 10.1111/cid.13373. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
8
Immunohistochemical Results of Soft tissues Around a New Implant Healing-Abutment Surface: A Human Study.新型种植体愈合基台表面周围软组织的免疫组织化学结果:一项人体研究。
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 2;9(4):1009. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041009.
9
Comparison of peri-implant and periodontal marginal soft tissues in health and disease.比较健康和疾病状态下种植体周围和牙周边缘软组织。
Periodontol 2000. 2018 Feb;76(1):116-130. doi: 10.1111/prd.12150. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
10
Effect Morphology and Surface Treatment of the Abutments of Dental Implants on the Dimension and Health of Peri-Implant Biological Space.牙种植体基台的效应形态学及表面处理对种植体周围生物空间尺寸和健康的影响
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jun 22;15(13):4422. doi: 10.3390/ma15134422.

引用本文的文献

1
Surface modification strategies to reinforce the soft tissue seal at transmucosal region of dental implants.用于增强牙种植体经黏膜区域软组织封闭的表面改性策略。
Bioact Mater. 2024 Sep 10;42:404-432. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.08.042. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Tenascin-C: A Key Regulator in Angiogenesis during Wound Healing.Tenascin-C:创伤愈合过程中血管生成的关键调节因子。
Biomolecules. 2022 Nov 15;12(11):1689. doi: 10.3390/biom12111689.
2
What is the prevalence of peri-implantitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.种植体周围炎的流行率是多少?系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Oct 19;22(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02493-8.
3
Human mesenchymal amniotic fluid stem cells reveal an unexpected neuronal potential differentiating into functional spinal motor neurons.
人羊膜间充质干细胞展现出意想不到的神经元潜能,可分化为功能性脊髓运动神经元。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022 Jul 22;10:936990. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.936990. eCollection 2022.
4
The role of keratinized mucosa width as a risk factor for peri-implant disease: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.角化黏膜宽度作为种植体周围疾病危险因素的作用:系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Jun;24(3):287-300. doi: 10.1111/cid.13080. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
5
Functions of Matricellular Proteins in Dental Tissues and Their Emerging Roles in Orofacial Tissue Development, Maintenance, and Disease.细胞基质蛋白在牙齿组织中的功能及其在口腔颌面部组织发育、维持和疾病中的新作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jun 21;22(12):6626. doi: 10.3390/ijms22126626.
6
Epithelial and Connective Tissue Sealing around Titanium Implants with Various Typical Surface Finishes.具有各种典型表面处理的钛植入物周围的上皮和结缔组织封闭
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019 Oct 14;5(10):4976-4984. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00499. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
7
The biological width around implant.种植体周围的生物学宽度。
J Prosthodont Res. 2021 Feb 24;65(1):11-18. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPOR_2019_356. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
8
Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Unveil an Unexpected Differentiation Potential toward the Dopaminergic Neuronal Lineage.人骨髓间充质干细胞揭示了向多巴胺能神经元谱系的意外分化潜能。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Sep 9;21(18):6589. doi: 10.3390/ijms21186589.
9
Gingival Response to Dental Implant: Comparison Study on the Effects of New Nanopored Laser-Treated vs. Traditional Healing Abutments.牙龈对种植体的反应:新型纳米微孔激光处理与传统愈合基台的效果比较研究。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Aug 22;21(17):6056. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176056.
10
Immunohistochemical Results of Soft tissues Around a New Implant Healing-Abutment Surface: A Human Study.新型种植体愈合基台表面周围软组织的免疫组织化学结果:一项人体研究。
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 2;9(4):1009. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041009.