Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, London, SE5 9RJ, UK.
Evaluation & Translation Directorate, Science Group, Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, UKHSA, Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK.
BMC Psychol. 2023 Jun 27;11(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01221-3.
As of March 2020, the UK public were instructed to work from home where possible and as a result, nearly half of those in employment did so during the following month. Pre-pandemic, around 5% of workers chose to work from home; it was often seen as advantageous, for example due to eliminating commuting time and increasing flexibility. However, homeworking also had negative connotations, for example, blurred boundaries between work and home life due to a sense of constant connectivity to the workplace. Understanding the psychological impact of working from home in an enforced and prolonged manner due to the COVID-19 pandemic is important. Therefore, this review sought to establish the relationship between working from home, mental health, and productivity.
In January 2022, literature searches were conducted across four electronic databases: Medline, Embase, PsycInfo and Web of Science. In February 2022 grey literature searches were conducted using Google Advanced Search, NHS Evidence; Gov.uk Publications and the British Library directory of online doctoral theses. Published and unpublished literature which collected data after March 2020, included participants who experienced working from home for at least some of their working hours, and detailed the association in terms of mental health or productivity were included.
In total 6,906 citations were screened and 25 papers from electronic databases were included. Grey literature searching resulted in two additional papers. Therefore, 27 studies were included in this review. Findings suggest the association between homeworking and both, mental health and productivity varies considerably, suggesting a complex relationship, with many factors (e.g., demographics, occupation) having an influence on the relationship.
We found that there was no clear consensus as to the association between working from home and mental health or productivity. However, there are indications that those who start homeworking for the first time during a pandemic are at risk of poor productivity, as are those who experience poor mental health. Suggestions for future research are suggested.
截至 2020 年 3 月,英国公众被指示尽可能在家工作,因此,在接下来的一个月里,近一半的就业人员在家工作。大流行前,约有 5%的员工选择在家工作;这通常是有利的,例如可以节省通勤时间并提高灵活性。然而,在家工作也有负面含义,例如,由于对工作场所的持续连接感,工作和家庭生活之间的界限变得模糊。了解由于 COVID-19 大流行而被迫延长在家工作对心理健康和生产力的影响很重要。因此,本综述旨在确定在家工作、心理健康和生产力之间的关系。
2022 年 1 月,在四个电子数据库中进行了文献检索:Medline、Embase、PsycInfo 和 Web of Science。2022 年 2 月,使用 Google 高级搜索、NHS 证据、Gov.uk 出版物和大英图书馆在线博士论文目录进行了灰色文献检索。纳入的文献包括在 2020 年 3 月之后收集数据的发表和未发表文献,参与者至少在家工作了部分工作时间,并详细说明了心理健康或生产力方面的关联。
共筛选了 6906 条引文,纳入了 25 篇来自电子数据库的论文。灰色文献检索又增加了 2 篇论文。因此,本综述共纳入 27 项研究。研究结果表明,在家工作与心理健康和生产力之间的关联差异很大,这表明存在复杂的关系,许多因素(例如,人口统计学、职业)对这种关系有影响。
我们发现,在家工作与心理健康或生产力之间的关联没有明确的共识。然而,有迹象表明,那些在大流行期间首次开始在家工作的人可能会面临生产力下降的风险,那些心理健康状况不佳的人也是如此。本文还提出了未来研究的建议。