Zhang Xuxin, Du Hehe, Zhao Zhouzhou, Wu Ying, Cao Zhenjie, Zhou Yongcan, Sun Yun
Sanya Nanfan Research Institute, Hainan University, Sanya 572022, China.
Collaborative Innovation Center of Marine Science and Technology, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jun 19;13(12):2035. doi: 10.3390/ani13122035.
The spread of invasive species (IS) has the potential to upset ecosystem balances. In extreme cases, this can hinder economical utilization of both aquatic (fisheries) and terrestrial (agricultural) systems. As a result, many countries regard risk assessment of IS as an important process for solving the problem of biological invasion. Yet, some IS are purposefully introduced for what is seen as their potential economic benefits. Thus, conducting IS risk assessments and then formulating policies based on scientific information will allow protocols to be developed that can reduce problems associated with IS incursions, whether occurring purposefully or not. However, the risk assessment methods currently adopted by most countries use qualitative or semiquantitative methodologies. Currently, there is a mismatch between qualitative and quantitative assessments. Moreover, most assessment systems are for terrestrial animals. What is needed is an assessment system for aquatic animals; however, those currently available are relatively rudimentary. To fill this gap, we used the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to build a risk assessment model system for aquatic IS. Our AHP has four primary indexes, twelve secondary indexes, and sixty tertiary indexes. We used this AHP to conduct quantitative risk assessments on five aquatic animals that are typically introduced in China, which have distinct biological characteristics, specific introduction purposes, and can represent different types of aquatic animals. The assessment results show that the risk grade for is high; the risk grade for , , and elegans is medium; and the grade risk for is low. Risk assessment of the introduction of aquatic animals using our AHP is effective, and it provides support for the introduction and healthy breeding of aquatic animals. Thus, the AHP model can provide a basis for decision-making risk management concerning the introduction of species.
入侵物种(IS)的扩散有可能扰乱生态系统平衡。在极端情况下,这会阻碍对水生(渔业)和陆地(农业)系统的经济利用。因此,许多国家将入侵物种的风险评估视为解决生物入侵问题的重要过程。然而,一些入侵物种是出于其潜在的经济利益而被有意引入的。因此,进行入侵物种风险评估,然后根据科学信息制定政策,将有助于制定可减少与入侵物种入侵相关问题的方案,无论其入侵是有意还是无意发生。然而,目前大多数国家采用的风险评估方法使用的是定性或半定量方法。目前,定性评估和定量评估之间存在不匹配。此外,大多数评估系统是针对陆生动物的。需要的是一个针对水生动物的评估系统;然而,目前可用的系统相对简陋。为了填补这一空白,我们使用层次分析法(AHP)构建了一个针对水生入侵物种的风险评估模型系统。我们的层次分析法有四个主要指标、十二个二级指标和六十个三级指标。我们使用这个层次分析法对中国通常引入的五种水生动物进行了定量风险评估,这些动物具有不同的生物学特征、特定的引入目的,并且可以代表不同类型的水生动物。评估结果表明,[具体物种1]的风险等级为高;[具体物种2]、[具体物种3]和秀丽[具体物种4]的风险等级为中;[具体物种5]的风险等级为低。使用我们的层次分析法对水生动物引入进行风险评估是有效的,并且为水生动物的引入和健康养殖提供了支持。因此,层次分析法模型可以为物种引入的风险管理决策提供依据。