Suppr超能文献

使用三种不同技术植入椎弓根螺钉的拔出强度:聚氨酯泡沫块的生物力学研究

Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screws Inserted Using Three Different Techniques: A Biomechanical Study on Polyurethane Foam Block.

作者信息

Wu Lien-Chen, Hsieh Yueh-Ying, Tsuang Fon-Yih, Kuo Yi-Jie, Chen Chia-Hsien, Chiang Chang-Jung

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan.

Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 11031, Taiwan.

出版信息

Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 May 30;10(6):660. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10060660.

Abstract

Pullout strength is an important indicator of the performance and longevity of pedicle screws and can be heavily influenced by the screw design, the insertion technique and the quality of surrounding bone. The purpose of this study was to investigate the pullout strength of three different pedicle screws inserted using three different strategies and with two different loading conditions. Three pedicle screws with different thread designs (single-lead-thread (SLT) screw, dual-lead-thread (DLT) screw and mixed-single-lead-thread (MSLT) screw) were inserted into a pre-drilled rigid polyurethane foam block using three strategies: (A) screw inserted to a depth of 33.5 mm; (B) screw inserted to a depth of 33.5 mm and then reversed by 3.5 mm to simulate an adjustment of the tulip height of the pedicle screw and (C) screw inserted to a depth of 30 mm. After insertion, each screw type was set up with and without a cyclic load being applied to the screw head prior to the pullout test. To ensure that the normality assumption is met, we applied the Shapiro-Wilk test to all datasets before conducting the non-parametric statistical test (Kruskal-Wallis test combined with pairwise Mann-Whitney-U tests). All screw types inserted using strategy A had a significantly greater pullout strength than those inserted using strategies B and C, regardless of if the screw was pre-loaded with a cyclic load prior to testing. Without the use of the cyclic pre-load, the MSLT screw had a greater pullout strength than the SLT and DLT screws for all three insertion strategies. However, the fixation strength of all screws was reduced when pre-loaded before testing, with the MSLT screw inserted using strategy B producing a significantly lower pullout strength than all other groups ( < 0.05). In contrast, the MSLT screw using insertion strategies A and C had a greater pullout strength than the SLT and DLT screws both with and without pre-loading. In conclusion, the MSLT pedicle screw exhibited the greatest pullout strength of the screws tested under all insertion strategies and loading conditions, except for insertion strategy B with a cyclic pre-load. While all screw types showed a reduced pullout strength when using insertion strategy B (screw-out depth adjustment), the MSLT screw had the largest reduction in pullout strength when using a pre-load before testing. Based on these findings, during the initial screw insertion, it is recommended to not fully insert the screw thread into the bone and to leave a retention length for depth adjustment to avoid the need for screw-out adjustment, as with insertion strategy B.

摘要

拔出强度是椎弓根螺钉性能和使用寿命的重要指标,会受到螺钉设计、植入技术和周围骨质质量的严重影响。本研究的目的是探究三种不同的椎弓根螺钉在采用三种不同策略并在两种不同加载条件下的拔出强度。将三种具有不同螺纹设计的椎弓根螺钉(单头螺纹(SLT)螺钉、双头螺纹(DLT)螺钉和混合单头螺纹(MSLT)螺钉)通过三种策略植入预先钻孔的硬质聚氨酯泡沫块中:(A)螺钉植入深度为33.5毫米;(B)螺钉植入深度为33.5毫米,然后反向3.5毫米以模拟椎弓根螺钉郁金香高度的调整;(C)螺钉植入深度为30毫米。植入后,在拔出试验前,对每种螺钉类型分别设置施加和不施加循环载荷到螺钉头部的情况。为确保满足正态性假设,在进行非参数统计检验(Kruskal-Wallis检验结合两两Mann-Whitney-U检验)之前,我们对所有数据集应用了Shapiro-Wilk检验。无论在测试前螺钉是否预先加载循环载荷,采用策略A植入的所有螺钉类型的拔出强度均显著高于采用策略B和C植入的螺钉。在不使用循环预加载的情况下,对于所有三种植入策略来说,MSLT螺钉的拔出强度均高于SLT和DLT螺钉。然而,在测试前进行预加载时,所有螺钉的固定强度均降低,采用策略B植入的MSLT螺钉的拔出强度显著低于所有其他组(<0.05)。相比之下,采用植入策略A和C的MSLT螺钉在有和没有预加载的情况下,其拔出强度均高于SLT和DLT螺钉。总之,除了采用循环预加载的植入策略B外,在所有植入策略和加载条件下,MSLT椎弓根螺钉在测试的螺钉中表现出最大拔出强度。虽然在采用植入策略B(拧出深度调整)时,所有螺钉类型的拔出强度均降低,但在测试前使用预加载时,MSLT螺钉的拔出强度降低幅度最大。基于这些发现,在初次螺钉植入过程中,建议不要将螺钉螺纹完全插入骨内,并留出一定的保留长度用于深度调整,以避免像植入策略B那样需要进行拧出调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb8/10295652/154e0f32c730/bioengineering-10-00660-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验