Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.
Nutrients. 2023 Jun 11;15(12):2711. doi: 10.3390/nu15122711.
The use of non- and low-caloric sweetener(s) (NCS and LCS) as a means to prevent overweight and obesity is highly debated, as both NCS and LCS have been proposed to have a negative impact on energy homeostasis. This systematic review aimed to assess the impact of NCS and LCS on fasting and postprandial substrate oxidation, energy expenditure, and catecholamines, compared to caloric sweeteners or water, across different doses and types of NCS and LCS, acutely and in the longer-term. A total of 20 studies were eligible: 16 studies for substrate oxidation and energy expenditure and four studies for catecholamines. Most studies compared the acute effects of NCS or LCS with caloric sweeteners under non-isoenergetic conditions. These studies generally found higher fat oxidation and lower carbohydrate oxidation with NCS or LCS than with caloric sweeteners. Findings for energy expenditure were inconsistent. With the limited number of studies, no convincing pattern for the remaining outcomes and comparisons could be seen. In conclusion, drinks or meals with NCS or LCS resulted in higher fat and lower carbohydrate oxidation compared to caloric sweeteners. No other conclusions could be drawn due to insufficient or inconsistent results. Further studies in this research field are warranted.
非营养性和低热量甜味剂(NCS 和 LCS)被用作预防超重和肥胖的手段存在很大争议,因为 NCS 和 LCS 被认为对能量平衡有负面影响。本系统评价旨在评估与热量甜味剂或水相比,NCS 和 LCS 在不同剂量和类型下,无论是急性还是长期,对空腹和餐后底物氧化、能量消耗和儿茶酚胺的影响。共有 20 项研究符合条件:16 项研究用于评估底物氧化和能量消耗,4 项研究用于评估儿茶酚胺。大多数研究在非等能量条件下比较了 NCS 或 LCS 与热量甜味剂的急性影响。这些研究普遍发现,与热量甜味剂相比,NCS 或 LCS 可促进更高的脂肪氧化和更低的碳水化合物氧化。对于能量消耗的研究结果并不一致。由于研究数量有限,无法对其余结果和比较得出明确的结论。总的来说,与热量甜味剂相比,含 NCS 或 LCS 的饮料或餐食可促进更高的脂肪氧化和更低的碳水化合物氧化。由于结果不足或不一致,无法得出其他结论。因此,有必要在该研究领域开展进一步的研究。