Suppr超能文献

低热量甜味剂对能量摄入和体重的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析持续干预研究。

The effects of low-calorie sweeteners on energy intake and body weight: a systematic review and meta-analyses of sustained intervention studies.

机构信息

Nutrition and Behaviour Unit, School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK.

出版信息

Int J Obes (Lond). 2021 Mar;45(3):464-478. doi: 10.1038/s41366-020-00704-2. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

Abstract

Previous meta-analyses of intervention studies have come to different conclusions about effects of consumption of low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) on body weight. The present review included 60 articles reporting 88 parallel-groups and cross-over studies ≥1 week in duration that reported either body weight (BW), BMI and/or energy intake (EI) outcomes. Studies were analysed according to whether they compared (1) LCS with sugar, (2) LCS with water or nothing, or (3) LCS capsules with placebo capsules. Results showed an effect in favour of LCS vs sugar for BW (29 parallel-groups studies, 2267 participants: BW change, -1.06 kg, 95% CI -1.50 to -0.62, I = 51%), BMI and EI. Effect on BW change increased with 'dose' of sugar replaced by LCS, whereas there were no differences in study outcome as a function of duration of the intervention or participant blinding. Overall, results showed no difference in effects of LCS vs water/nothing for BW (11 parallel-groups studies, 1068 participants: BW change, 0.10 kg, 95% CI -0.87 to 1.07, I = 82%), BMI and EI; and inconsistent effects for LCS consumed in capsules (BW change: -0.28 kg, 95% CI -0.80 to 0.25, I = 0%; BMI change: 0.20 kg/m, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.36, I = 0%). Occurrence of adverse events was not affected by the consumption of LCS. The studies available did not permit robust analysis of effects by LCS type. In summary, outcomes were not clearly affected when the treatments differed in sweetness, nor when LCS were consumed in capsules without tasting; however, when treatments differed in energy value (LCS vs sugar), there were consistent effects in favour of LCS. The evidence from human intervention studies supports the use of LCS in weight management, constrained primarily by the amount of added sugar that LCS can displace in the diet.

摘要

先前关于干预研究的荟萃分析对低热量甜味剂(LCS)的消耗对体重的影响得出了不同的结论。本综述纳入了 60 篇报告了持续时间至少为 1 周的 88 项平行组和交叉研究的文章,这些研究报告了体重(BW)、BMI 和/或能量摄入(EI)的结果。研究根据是否比较了(1)LCS 与糖,(2)LCS 与水或无,或(3)LCS 胶囊与安慰剂胶囊进行了分析。结果表明,与糖相比,LCS 对 BW(29 项平行组研究,2267 名参与者:BW 变化,-1.06kg,95%CI -1.50 至-0.62,I=51%)、BMI 和 EI 有有利影响。BW 变化的效果随着用 LCS 替代糖的“剂量”增加而增加,而研究结果在干预持续时间或参与者盲法方面没有差异。总的来说,与水/无相比,LCS 对 BW(11 项平行组研究,1068 名参与者:BW 变化,0.10kg,95%CI -0.87 至 1.07,I=82%)、BMI 和 EI 没有差异;LCS 胶囊的消耗效果不一致(BW 变化:-0.28kg,95%CI -0.80 至 0.25,I=0%;BMI 变化:0.20kg/m,95%CI 0.04 至 0.36,I=0%)。不良反应的发生不受 LCS 消耗的影响。现有的研究不允许对 LCS 类型的影响进行稳健分析。总之,当治疗方法在甜度上存在差异,或者当 LCS 胶囊在不品尝的情况下被消耗时,结果并没有明显受到影响;然而,当治疗方法在能量值上存在差异(LCS 与糖)时,LCS 一直有利。来自人体干预研究的证据支持在体重管理中使用 LCS,主要受到 LCS 可以替代饮食中添加糖的数量的限制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验