El-Tanani Mohamed, Ahmed Khaled Abdul-Aziz, Shakya Ashok K, Ammari Wesam G, Al-Shudifat Abdel-Elah
Pharmacological and Diagnostic Research Centre (PDRC), Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 19328, Jordan.
Institute of Cancer Therapeutics, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 May 29;16(6):799. doi: 10.3390/ph16060799.
The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has spread throughout the world, affecting almost all nations and territories. The current double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II clinical trial sought to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of mebendazole as an adjuvant therapy for outpatients with COVID-19. The patients were recruited and divided into two groups: a Mebendazole-treated group and placebo group. The mebendazole and placebo groups were matched for age, sex, and complete blood count (CBC) with differential and liver and kidney function tests at baseline. On the third day, the C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were lower (2.03 ± 1.45 vs. 5.45 ± 3.95, < 0.001) and the cycle threshold (CT) levels were higher (27.21 ± 3.81 vs. 24.40 ± 3.09, = 0.046) significantly in the mebendazole group than in the placebo group on the third day. Furthermore, CRP decreased and CT dramatically increased on day three compared to the baseline day in the mebendazole group ( < 0.001 and = 0.008, respectively). There was a significant inverse correlation between lymphocytes and CT levels in the mebendazole group ( = -0.491, = 0.039) but not in the placebo group ( = 0.051, = 0.888). Mebendazole therapy increased innate immunity and returned inflammation to normal levels in COVID-19 outpatients faster than it did in the placebo group in this clinical trial. Our findings add to the growing body of research on the clinical and microbiological benefits of repurposing antiparasitic therapy, specifically mebendazole, for SARS-CoV-2 infection and other viral infections.
新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情已蔓延至全球,几乎影响到所有国家和地区。当前这项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的II期临床试验旨在评估甲苯达唑作为新型冠状病毒肺炎门诊患者辅助治疗的临床疗效和安全性。患者被招募并分为两组:甲苯达唑治疗组和安慰剂组。甲苯达唑组和安慰剂组在年龄、性别以及基线时的全血细胞计数(CBC)及分类、肝肾功能检查方面进行了匹配。在第三天,甲苯达唑组的C反应蛋白(CRP)水平显著低于安慰剂组(2.03±1.45对5.45±3.95,<0.001),循环阈值(CT)水平显著高于安慰剂组(27.21±3.81对24.40±3.09,=0.046)。此外,与基线日相比,甲苯达唑组在第三天CRP下降且CT显著升高(分别为<0.001和=0.008)。在甲苯达唑组中淋巴细胞与CT水平之间存在显著负相关(=-0.491,=0.039),而在安慰剂组中无此相关性(=0.051,=0.888)。在这项临床试验中,甲苯达唑治疗比安慰剂组更快地增强了新型冠状病毒肺炎门诊患者的先天免疫力,并使炎症恢复到正常水平。我们的研究结果为将抗寄生虫疗法,特别是甲苯达唑,重新用于治疗严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2感染和其他病毒感染的临床及微生物学益处的研究增添了内容。