Notter Isabelle R, Logan John R
Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
City Community. 2022 Mar;21(1):42-61. doi: 10.1177/15356841211052534. Epub 2021 Oct 31.
We study the residential patterns of blacks and mulattoes in 10 Southern cities in 1880 and 1920. researchers have documented the salience of social differences among African Americans in this period, partly related to mulattoes' higher occupational status. Did these differences result in clustering of these two groups in different neighborhoods, and were mulattoes less separated from whites? If so, did the differences diminish in these decades after reconstruction due a Jim Crow system that did not distinguish between blacks and mulattoes? We use geocoded census microdata for 1880 and 1920 to address these questions. Segregation between whites and both blacks and mulattoes was already high in 1880, especially at a fine spatial scale, and it increased sharply by 1920. In this respect, whites did not distinguish between these two groups. However, blacks and mulattoes were quite segregated from one another in 1880, and even more so by 1920. this pattern did not result from mulattoes' moderately higher-class position. Hence, as the color line between whites and all non-whites was becoming harder, blacks and mulattoes were separating further from each other. understanding what led to this pattern remains a key question about racial identities and racialization in the early twentieth century.
我们研究了1880年和1920年10个南方城市中黑人和混血儿的居住模式。研究人员记录了这一时期非裔美国人之间社会差异的显著性,部分原因与混血儿较高的职业地位有关。这些差异是否导致这两个群体聚集在不同的社区,以及混血儿与白人的隔离程度是否较低?如果是这样,在重建后的几十年里,由于吉姆·克劳制度没有区分黑人和混血儿,这些差异是否会缩小?我们使用1880年和1920年的地理编码人口普查微观数据来回答这些问题。1880年,白人与黑人和混血儿之间的隔离程度已经很高,尤其是在精细的空间尺度上,到1920年急剧增加。在这方面,白人没有区分这两个群体。然而,1880年黑人和混血儿彼此之间的隔离程度相当高,到1920年更是如此。这种模式并非源于混血儿略高的社会阶层地位。因此,随着白人与所有非白人之间的肤色界限变得更加严格,黑人和混血儿彼此之间的距离也在进一步拉大。理解导致这种模式的原因仍然是20世纪初关于种族身份和种族化的一个关键问题。