Suppr超能文献

2000-2011 年按社会经济地位划分的白人居住隔离模式。

The residential segregation patterns of whites by socioeconomic status, 2000-2011.

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Population Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, 211 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Res. 2013 Jul;42(4):1046-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

Abstract

In light of increasing racial and ethnic diversity, a recent housing crisis, and deep economic recession, arguments pertaining to the role of socioeconomic status (SES) in shaping patterns of racial/ethnic segregation remain salient. Using data from the 2000 decennial census and the 2007-2011 American Community Survey, we provide new evidence on the residential segregation patterns of whites from minorities by SES (income, education, and poverty). Results from our comprehensive analyses indicate that SES matters for the segregation patterns of whites from minorities. In particular, we find that whites as a whole are less segregated from higher-SES minority group members than lower-SES ones. Among whites, those of higher SES are more segregated from blacks and Hispanics as a whole and less segregated from Asians, indicating the importance of SES differentials across racial/ethnic groups in shaping residential patterns. We also find that during the 2000s, white-black segregation remained stable or declined, while whites became more segregated from Hispanics and Asians by all SES indicators. Fixed-effects models indicate that increasing white-minority SES segregation was fueled in part by increases in a metropolitan area's immigrant and elderly populations, minority poverty rate, and home values, while declining segregation was associated with rising education levels and new housing construction.

摘要

鉴于种族和民族多样性的增加、最近的住房危机以及严重的经济衰退,关于社会经济地位(SES)在塑造种族/民族隔离模式中的作用的争论仍然很重要。我们使用 2000 年十年一次的人口普查和 2007-2011 年美国社区调查的数据,就 SES(收入、教育和贫困)对白人少数族裔的居住隔离模式提供了新的证据。我们全面分析的结果表明,SES 对白人少数族裔的隔离模式很重要。特别是,我们发现,总体而言,白人比 SES 较低的少数群体成员与 SES 较高的少数群体成员的隔离程度较低。在白人中,那些 SES 较高的人与黑人整体和西班牙裔的隔离程度较高,与亚裔的隔离程度较低,这表明 SES 差异在塑造居住模式方面对不同种族/民族群体的重要性。我们还发现,在 2000 年代,白人和黑人的隔离程度保持稳定或下降,而白人与西班牙裔和亚裔的隔离程度在所有 SES 指标上都有所增加。固定效应模型表明,导致白人和少数族裔 SES 隔离程度增加的部分原因是一个大都市区的移民和老年人口、少数族裔贫困率和房价的增加,而隔离程度的下降则与教育水平的提高和新住房建设有关。

相似文献

10
Suburbanization and Segregation in the United States: 1970-2010.美国的郊区化与隔离:1970 - 2010年
Ethn Racial Stud. 2018;41(9):1594-1611. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2017.1312010. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Racial Segregation and the American Foreclosure Crisis.种族隔离与美国止赎危机。
Am Sociol Rev. 2010 Oct 1;75(5):629-651. doi: 10.1177/0003122410380868.
3
The Changing Bases of Segregation in the United States.美国种族隔离的变化基础。
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2009 Nov 1;626(1). doi: 10.1177/0002716209343558.
4
NEIGHBORHOOD IMMIGRATION AND NATIVE OUT-MIGRATION.社区移民与本地人口外流。
Am Sociol Rev. 2011 Feb 1;76(1):25-47. doi: 10.1177/0003122410396197.
6
Income inequality and income segregation.收入不平等和收入隔离。
AJS. 2011 Jan;116(4):1092-153. doi: 10.1086/657114.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验