McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
PeerJ. 2023 Jun 23;11:e15389. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15389. eCollection 2023.
Predators and prey exist in persistent conflict that often hinges on deception-the transmission of misleading or manipulative signals-as a means for survival. Deceptive traits are widespread across taxa and sensory systems, representing an evolutionarily successful and common strategy. Moreover, the highly conserved nature of the major sensory systems often extends these traits past single species predator-prey interactions toward a broader set of perceivers. As such, deceptive traits can provide a unique window into the capabilities, constraints and commonalities across divergent and phylogenetically-related perceivers. Researchers have studied deceptive traits for centuries, but a unified framework for categorizing different types of post-detection deception in predator-prey conflict still holds potential to inform future research. We suggest that deceptive traits can be distinguished by their effect on object formation processes. Perceptual objects are composed of physical attributes (what) and spatial (where) information. Deceptive traits that operate after object formation can therefore influence the perception and processing of either or both of these axes. We build upon previous work using a perceiver perspective approach to delineate deceptive traits by whether they closely match the sensory information of another object or create a discrepancy between perception and reality by exploiting the sensory shortcuts and perceptual biases of their perceiver. We then further divide this second category, sensory illusions, into traits that distort object characteristics along either the what or where axes, and those that create the perception of whole novel objects, integrating the what/where axes. Using predator-prey examples, we detail each step in this framework and propose future avenues for research. We suggest that this framework will help organize the many forms of deceptive traits and help generate predictions about selective forces that have driven animal form and behavior across evolutionary time.
捕食者和猎物之间存在着持久的冲突,这种冲突往往取决于欺骗——即传递误导或操纵的信号——作为生存的一种手段。欺骗特征在各个分类群和感觉系统中广泛存在,代表了一种进化上成功和常见的策略。此外,主要感觉系统的高度保守性质通常使这些特征超越了单一物种的捕食者-猎物相互作用,而扩展到更广泛的感知者群体。因此,欺骗特征可以为不同的感知者提供一个独特的视角,了解它们的能力、限制和共同点,这些感知者具有不同的特征和进化关系。研究人员已经研究了欺骗特征几个世纪,但在捕食者-猎物冲突中对不同类型的后检测欺骗进行分类的统一框架仍然有可能为未来的研究提供信息。我们认为,欺骗特征可以根据它们对物体形成过程的影响来区分。感知物体由物理属性(什么)和空间(哪里)信息组成。因此,在物体形成后起作用的欺骗特征可以影响对这些轴中的一个或两个的感知和处理。我们在前人工作的基础上,从感知者的角度出发,根据它们是否与另一个物体的感觉信息密切匹配,或者通过利用感知者的感觉捷径和感知偏差在感知和现实之间制造差异,来区分欺骗特征。然后,我们将这个第二类别,即感觉错觉,进一步细分为沿着什么或哪里轴扭曲物体特征的特征,以及那些创造整个新物体感知的特征,整合了什么/哪里轴。我们使用捕食者-猎物的例子详细说明了这个框架中的每一步,并提出了未来的研究途径。我们认为,这个框架将有助于组织欺骗特征的许多形式,并有助于对驱动动物形态和行为在进化过程中发生变化的选择力做出预测。