• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

带弹性头带的安全护目镜,用于在定量适合性测试失败后改善N95口罩的贴合度。

Safety Goggles with Elastic Headband to Improve N95 Fit Following Failed Quantitative Fit Test.

作者信息

Kamal Mohamed, Bhatti Mominah, Stewart Warren Christopher, Johns Moira, Collins David, Shehabi Yahya, Thambiraj Solomon Rajesh, Arora Sumesh

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023 Jun;27(6):386-391. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24473.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24473
PMID:37378367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10291674/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

N95 respirators, together with eye protection, form vital elements of personal protective equipment (PPE) for healthcare workers (HCW) caring for patients with respiratory infections, such as COVID-19. Duckbill N95 respirators are widely used but have a high failure rate when Fit Tested. The commonest site for inward leaks is the region between the nose and maxilla. Safety goggles with an elastic headband may press the upper rim of the respirator against the face, thereby reducing inward leaks. We hypothesized that the use of safety goggles with an elastic headband will improve the overall fit-factor of a duckbill N95 respirator and increase the proportion of users who pass a quantitative Fit Test.

METHODS

About 60 volunteer HCWs, who had previously failed quantitative Fit Testing with a duckbill N95 respirator, participated in this before-and-after intervention study. A PortaCount® 8048 was used for quantitative Fit Testing. The test was first performed with a duckbill N95 respirator only. It was then repeated after participants donned a pair of safety goggles (3M Fahrenheit, ID 70071531621).

RESULTS

Before the intervention, i.e., with the respirator only, 8 (13.3%) participants passed their Fit Test. This increased to 49 (81.7%) after the application of safety goggles (OR 42, 95% CI 7.14-1697.9, < 0.0001). The adjusted mean overall fit factor, using Tobit regression analysis, increased from 40.3 to 193.0 ( = 12.32, < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The use of safety goggles with an elastic headband significantly increases the proportion of users who pass a quantitative Fit Test and improves the fit-factor of a duckbill N95 respirator.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Kamal M, Bhatti M, Stewart WC, Johns M, Collins D, Shehabi Y, . Safety Goggles with Elastic Headband to Improve N95 Fit Following Failed Quantitative Fit Test. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(6):386-391.

摘要

引言

N95口罩与眼部防护一起,构成了医护人员护理呼吸道感染患者(如2019冠状病毒病患者)时个人防护装备(PPE)的重要组成部分。鸭嘴式N95口罩被广泛使用,但在进行适合性测试时失败率很高。向内泄漏最常见的部位是鼻子和上颌之间的区域。带有弹性头带的安全护目镜可能会将口罩的上边缘压在脸上,从而减少向内泄漏。我们假设,使用带有弹性头带的安全护目镜将提高鸭嘴式N95口罩的整体适合因数,并增加通过定量适合性测试的使用者比例。

方法

约60名此前使用鸭嘴式N95口罩定量适合性测试失败的医护人员志愿者参与了这项前后干预研究。使用PortaCount® 8048进行定量适合性测试。测试首先仅使用鸭嘴式N95口罩进行。然后在参与者戴上一副安全护目镜(3M Fahrenheit,产品编号70071531621)后重复进行。

结果

干预前,即仅使用口罩时,8名(13.3%)参与者通过了适合性测试。使用安全护目镜后,这一比例增至49名(81.7%)(比值比42,95%置信区间7.14 - 1697.9,P < 0.0001)。使用 Tobit 回归分析,调整后的平均整体适合因数从40.3增至193.0(t = 12.32,P < 0.001)。

结论

使用带有弹性头带的安全护目镜可显著增加通过定量适合性测试的使用者比例,并提高鸭嘴式N95口罩的适合因数。

如何引用本文

Kamal M, Bhatti M, Stewart WC, Johns M, Collins D, Shehabi Y, 。使用带有弹性头带的安全护目镜改善定量适合性测试失败后的N95口罩适合性。《印度重症监护医学杂志》2023年;27(6):386 - 391。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/76012f533bd7/ijccm-27-386-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/2490ba747f5d/ijccm-27-386-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/18ba565703d5/ijccm-27-386-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/ee986ca967e6/ijccm-27-386-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/0a45bd328adc/ijccm-27-386-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/36b8146129bf/ijccm-27-386-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/e28284e39d12/ijccm-27-386-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/b69b77075c9c/ijccm-27-386-eq001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/6a1c5db35045/ijccm-27-386-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/76012f533bd7/ijccm-27-386-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/2490ba747f5d/ijccm-27-386-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/18ba565703d5/ijccm-27-386-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/ee986ca967e6/ijccm-27-386-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/0a45bd328adc/ijccm-27-386-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/36b8146129bf/ijccm-27-386-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/e28284e39d12/ijccm-27-386-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/b69b77075c9c/ijccm-27-386-eq001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/6a1c5db35045/ijccm-27-386-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9198/10291674/76012f533bd7/ijccm-27-386-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety Goggles with Elastic Headband to Improve N95 Fit Following Failed Quantitative Fit Test.带弹性头带的安全护目镜,用于在定量适合性测试失败后改善N95口罩的贴合度。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023 Jun;27(6):386-391. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24473.
2
Fit Factor Change on Quantitative Fit Testing of Duckbill N95 Respirators with the Use of Safety Goggles.使用护目镜对鸭嘴式N95呼吸器进行定量适配性测试时的适配因素变化
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep;25(9):981-986. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23972.
3
Prediction of N95 Respirator Fit from Fogging of Eyeglasses: A Pilot Study.通过眼镜起雾预测N95口罩佩戴贴合度:一项初步研究。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep;25(9):976-980. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23947.
4
N95 respirators: quantitative fit test pass rates and usability and comfort assessment by health care workers.N95 呼吸器:医护人员定量贴合度测试通过率以及可用性和舒适度评估。
Med J Aust. 2022 Jul 18;217(2):88-93. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51585. Epub 2022 May 29.
5
Impact on quantitative fit-test results after application of prophylactic hydrocolloid dressing under N95 respirators.N95 口罩下预防性水胶体敷料应用对定量 fit-test 结果的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Aug;43(8):993-996. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.293. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
6
N95 respirator seal integrity following extended-use by healthcare workers in the intensive care unit: A cohort study.重症监护病房医护人员长期使用后N95口罩的密封完整性:一项队列研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2025 Jan;38(1):101099. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2024.07.080. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
7
The Effect on Fit of Multiple Consecutive Donning and Doffing of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators.N95 过滤式防护口罩多次佩戴和脱卸对贴合度的影响。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2019 Oct 11;63(8):930-936. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxz060.
8
The effect of N95 designs on respirator fit and its associations with gender and facial dimensions.N95 设计对呼吸器贴合度的影响及其与性别和面部尺寸的关系。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 29;18(11):e0288105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288105. eCollection 2023.
9
Respiratory protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: quantitative fit test outcomes for five type N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.针对结核分枝杆菌的呼吸防护:五种N95型过滤式面罩呼吸器的定量适合性测试结果
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004 Jan;1(1):22-8. doi: 10.1080/15459620490250026.
10
Incidence of Fit Test Failure During N95 Respirator Reuse and Extended Use.N95 呼吸器重复使用和延长使用期间的适合性检验失败率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2353631. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.53631.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of passing fit testing of the masks and respirators used during the COVID-19 pandemic: Part 1-quantitative fit test procedures.COVID-19 大流行期间使用的口罩和呼吸器的通过率测试的系统评价:第 1 部分——定量贴合测试程序。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 26;18(10):e0293129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293129. eCollection 2023.
2
Innovations with Validation: An Ingenious Way Forward?具有验证的创新:一条巧妙的前进之路?
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023 Jun;27(6):377-378. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24478.

本文引用的文献

1
P2/N95 filtering facepiece respirators: Results of a large-scale quantitative mask fit testing program in Australian health care workers.P2/N95 过滤式面罩呼吸器:澳大利亚医护人员大规模定量口罩适配测试计划的结果。
Am J Infect Control. 2022 May;50(5):509-515. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.12.016. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
2
Fit Factor Change on Quantitative Fit Testing of Duckbill N95 Respirators with the Use of Safety Goggles.使用护目镜对鸭嘴式N95呼吸器进行定量适配性测试时的适配因素变化
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep;25(9):981-986. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23972.
3
Clearing the Fog on the Use of N95 Mask.
拨开N95口罩使用的迷雾
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep;25(9):961-962. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23976.
4
Hospitals may Become "Disease Hotspots" for COVID-19 amid Shortage of Personal Protective Equipment.在个人防护装备短缺的情况下,医院可能会成为新冠病毒的“疾病热点地区”。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;24(11):1145-1146. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23645.
5
State of Personal Protective Equipment Practice in Indian Intensive Care Units amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Survey.新冠疫情期间印度重症监护病房个人防护装备的使用状况:一项全国性调查
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep;24(9):809-816. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23550.
6
COVID Collateral: "Don't Forget the Diligent Healthcare Worker".新冠疫情的附带影响:“不要忘记辛勤工作的医护人员”
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug;24(8):613-614. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23542.
7
Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study.一线医护人员和普通社区人群 COVID-19 发病风险:前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Sep;5(9):e475-e483. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30164-X. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
8
Personal Protective Equipment: A Pandora's Box.个人防护装备:潘多拉魔盒。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 May;24(5):371-372. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23443.
9
Does a Modified Adhesive Respirator Improve the Face Seal for Health Care Workers Who Previously Failed a Fit Test?: A Pilot Study During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.改良型粘性呼吸器能否改善此前适配测试不合格的医护人员的面部密封效果?:一项2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间的试点研究。
A A Pract. 2020 Jun;14(8):e01264. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000001264.
10
Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.物理隔离、口罩和眼部防护预防 SARS-CoV-2 和 COVID-19 的人际传播:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):1973-1987. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9. Epub 2020 Jun 1.