• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SPRINT 资格美国成年人强化收缩压治疗的预估人群健康获益。

Estimated Population Health Benefits of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Treatment Among SPRINT-Eligible US Adults.

机构信息

Intermountain Healthcare Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 2023 Aug 5;36(9):498-508. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpad047.

DOI:10.1093/ajh/hpad047
PMID:37378472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10403972/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) demonstrated an intensive (<120 mm Hg) vs. standard (<140 mm Hg) systolic blood pressure (SBP) goal lowered cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Estimating the effect of intensive SBP lowering among SPRINT-eligible adults most likely to benefit can guide implementation efforts.

METHODS

We studied SPRINT participants and SPRINT-eligible participants in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study and National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). A published algorithm of predicted CVD benefit with intensive SBP treatment was used to categorize participants into low, medium, or high predicted benefit. CVD event rates were estimated with intensive and standard treatment.

RESULTS

Median age was 67.0, 72.0, and 64.0 years in SPRINT, SPRINT-eligible REGARDS, and SPRINT-eligible NHANES participants, respectively. The proportion with high predicted benefit was 33.0% in SPRINT, 39.0% in SPRINT-eligible REGARDS, and 23.5% in SPRINT-eligible NHANES. The estimated difference in CVD event rate (standard minus intensive) was 7.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.4-10.7), 8.4 (95% CI 8.2-8.5), and 6.1 (95% CI 5.9-6.3) per 1,000 person-years in SPRINT, SPRINT-eligible REGARDS participants, and SPRINT-eligible NHANES participants, respectively (median 3.2-year follow-up). Intensive SBP treatment could prevent 84,300 (95% CI 80,800-87,920) CVD events per year in 14.1 million SPRINT-eligible US adults; 29,400 and 28,600 would be in 7.0 million individuals with medium or high predicted benefit, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the population health benefit from intensive SBP goals could be achieved by treating those characterized by a previously published algorithm as having medium or high predicted benefit.

摘要

背景

收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)表明,强化(<120mmHg)与标准(<140mmHg)收缩压(SBP)目标降低了心血管疾病(CVD)的风险。估计 SPRINT 中最有可能受益的合格成年人强化 SBP 降低的效果可以指导实施工作。

方法

我们研究了 SPRINT 参与者和 SPRINT 合格的 REGARDS 研究和国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)参与者。使用已发表的强化 SBP 治疗预测 CVD 获益的算法将参与者分为低、中或高预测获益。使用强化和标准治疗估计 CVD 事件发生率。

结果

SPRINT、SPRINT 合格的 REGARDS 和 SPRINT 合格的 NHANES 参与者的中位年龄分别为 67.0、72.0 和 64.0 岁。高预测获益的比例分别为 SPRINT 中的 33.0%、SPRINT 合格的 REGARDS 中的 39.0%和 SPRINT 合格的 NHANES 中的 23.5%。CVD 事件发生率(标准减去强化)的估计差异分别为 SPRINT 中的 7.0(95%置信区间[CI]3.4-10.7)、SPRINT 合格的 REGARDS 参与者中的 8.4(95%CI8.2-8.5)和 SPRINT 合格的 NHANES 参与者中的 6.1(95%CI5.9-6.3)/1000 人年(中位随访时间 3.2 年)。强化 SBP 治疗每年可预防 1410 万 SPRINT 合格的美国成年人中的 84300(95%CI80800-87920)CVD 事件;分别有 29400 和 28600 人将在具有中等或高预测获益的 700 万人中。

结论

通过治疗具有先前发表的算法特征的个体为中等或高预测获益,强化 SBP 目标可以实现大部分人群健康获益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26a0/10403972/dc49f4eeb14b/hpad047_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26a0/10403972/dc49f4eeb14b/hpad047_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26a0/10403972/dc49f4eeb14b/hpad047_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimated Population Health Benefits of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Treatment Among SPRINT-Eligible US Adults.SPRINT 资格美国成年人强化收缩压治疗的预估人群健康获益。
Am J Hypertens. 2023 Aug 5;36(9):498-508. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpad047.
2
Long-Term Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control on Mild Cognitive Impairment and Probable Dementia in SPRINT.强化与标准血压控制对收缩压干预与认知减退(SPRINT)研究中轻度认知障碍和疑似痴呆的长期影响
Neurology. 2025 Feb 11;104(3):e213334. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213334. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
3
Educational Attainment and the Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SPRINT Study.教育程度与强化降压效果:SPRINT研究的事后分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jun 3;14(11):e037712. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037712. Epub 2025 May 21.
4
Individualized Net Benefit of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in SPRINT.收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)中社区居住的老年人强化降压的个体化净获益
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 May;73(5):1441-1453. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19395. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
5
Mobile phone-based interventions for improving adherence to medication prescribed for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults.基于手机的干预措施,用于提高成年人心血管疾病一级预防中所开药物的依从性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 22;6(6):CD012675. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012675.pub2.
6
Effects of intensive blood pressure lowering on cardiovascular and renal outcomes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis.强化降压对心血管和肾脏结局的影响:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):435-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00805-3. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
7
Association of Isolated Diastolic Hypertension as Defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA Blood Pressure Guideline With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes.2017 年 ACC/AHA 血压指南定义的孤立性舒张期高血压与心血管事件的发生风险相关。
JAMA. 2020 Jan 28;323(4):329-338. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.21402.
8
Blood pressure control for diabetic retinopathy.糖尿病视网膜病变的血压控制
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 31;1:CD006127. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006127.pub2.
9
Higher blood pressure targets for hypertension in older adults.老年人高血压的更高血压目标
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 17;12(12):CD011575. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011575.pub3.
10
Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in adults aged 18 to 59 years.18至59岁成年人高血压的药物治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 16;8(8):CD008276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008276.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Annual Cost of Implementing Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Goals in the United States.美国实施强化收缩压目标的年度成本。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 17;13(18):e034515. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034515. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
2
What Constitutes Adequate Control of High Blood Pressure? Current Considerations.什么构成高血压的充分控制?当前的考量因素。
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2024 Jul 4;8(4):384-395. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.06.001. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Effectiveness of Hypertension Management Strategies in SPRINT-Eligible US Adults: A Simulation Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Antihypertensive Medication Regimens Used in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.用于收缩压干预试验的抗高血压药物治疗方案。
Hypertension. 2023 Mar;80(3):590-597. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.20373. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
2
Longer-Term All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality With Intensive Blood Pressure Control: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.强化血压控制的长期全因和心血管死亡率:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Nov 1;7(11):1138-1146. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.3345.
3
Blood Pressure Intervention and Control in SPRINT.
SPRINT 合格美国成年人高血压管理策略的有效性:一项模拟研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jan 16;13(2):e032370. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032370. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
SPRINT 中的血压干预和控制。
Hypertension. 2022 Sep;79(9):2071-2080. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17233. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
4
Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的试验最终报告。
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 20;384(20):1921-1930. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901281.
5
Patient Selection for Intensive Blood Pressure Management Based on Benefit and Adverse Events.基于获益和不良事件的强化血压管理患者选择。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Apr 27;77(16):1977-1990. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.058.
6
Characteristics of Populations Excluded From Clinical Trials Supporting Intensive Blood Pressure Control Guidelines.支持强化血压控制指南的临床试验排除人群的特征。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Apr 6;10(7):e019707. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019707. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
7
Blood Pressure Management in Stroke.脑卒中的血压管理。
Hypertension. 2020 Dec;76(6):1688-1695. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14653. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
8
Generalizability of Blood Pressure Lowering Trials to Older Patients: Cross-Sectional Analysis.降压试验对老年患者的可推广性:横断面分析
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Nov;68(11):2508-2515. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16749. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
9
Generalizability of Clinical Trials Supporting the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline.支持 2017 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会血压指南的临床试验的可推广性。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):795-797. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0051.
10
Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control in Adults 80 Years or Older: A Secondary Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.成年人 80 岁或以上的强化与标准血压控制比较:收缩压干预试验的二次分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Mar;68(3):496-504. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16272. Epub 2019 Dec 16.