• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SPRINT 中的血压干预和控制。

Blood Pressure Intervention and Control in SPRINT.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, and Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis (W.C.C.).

Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, NM (R.J.R.).

出版信息

Hypertension. 2022 Sep;79(9):2071-2080. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17233. Epub 2022 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17233
PMID:35766041
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) demonstrated reductions in major cardiovascular disease events and mortality with an intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) goal intervention. However, a detailed description of the blood pressure intervention, antihypertensive medication usage, blood pressure levels, and rates and predictors of blood pressure control has not been reported previously.

METHODS

Hypertensive participants (n=9361) 50 years and older with elevated cardiovascular disease risk were randomized 1:1 to SBP goal <120 mm Hg or SBP goal <140 mm Hg. Guideline-recommended antihypertensive medications and dosing were provided at no cost. Intensive group participants were started on at least 2 medications, and medications were adjusted monthly until SBP goal was achieved, if feasible. Standard group participants were treated to achieve SBP 135 to 139 mm Hg.

RESULTS

Baseline blood pressure (median±interquartile range) was 138±19/78±16 mm Hg. For intensive group participants, percent at goal rose from 8.9% at baseline to 52.4% at 6 months and average antihypertensive medications rose from 2.2 to 2.7; SBP was <120 mm Hg in 61.6% and <130 mm Hg in 80.0% at their final visit. For the standard group participants, percent at goal rose from 53.0% at baseline to 68.6% at 6 months, while antihypertensive medications fell from 1.9 to 1.8. From 6 to 36 months, median SBP was stable at 119±14 mm Hg for intensive and 136±15 mm Hg for standard participants, with stable numbers of medications. Few predictors of SBP control were found in multiple regression models.

CONCLUSIONS

These results may inform and help replicate the benefits of SPRINT in clinical practice.

REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT01206062.

摘要

背景

SPRINT(收缩压干预试验)表明,强化收缩压(SBP)目标干预可降低主要心血管疾病事件和死亡率。然而,以前尚未详细描述血压干预、降压药物使用、血压水平以及血压控制率和预测因素。

方法

将 50 岁及以上心血管疾病风险升高的高血压参与者随机分为 1:1 组,分别接受 SBP 目标<120mmHg 或 SBP 目标<140mmHg。免费提供指南推荐的降压药物和剂量。强化组参与者至少开始使用 2 种药物,每月调整药物剂量,直到达到 SBP 目标,如果可行的话。标准组参与者接受治疗,以实现 SBP 135-139mmHg。

结果

基线血压(中位数±四分位距)为 138±19/78±16mmHg。对于强化组参与者,目标达标率从基线时的 8.9%上升到 6 个月时的 52.4%,平均降压药物从 2.2 增加到 2.7;最终就诊时,61.6%的患者 SBP<120mmHg,80.0%的患者 SBP<130mmHg。对于标准组参与者,目标达标率从基线时的 53.0%上升到 6 个月时的 68.6%,同时降压药物从 1.9 降至 1.8。从 6 个月到 36 个月,强化组的中位数 SBP 稳定在 119±14mmHg,标准组稳定在 136±15mmHg,药物数量稳定。在多变量回归模型中,发现了几个血压控制的预测因素。

结论

这些结果可能为在临床实践中复制 SPRINT 的益处提供信息和帮助。

登记

网址:http://www.。

临床试验

gov;唯一标识符:NCT01206062。

相似文献

1
Blood Pressure Intervention and Control in SPRINT.SPRINT 中的血压干预和控制。
Hypertension. 2022 Sep;79(9):2071-2080. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17233. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
2
Antihypertensive Medication Regimens Used in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.用于收缩压干预试验的抗高血压药物治疗方案。
Hypertension. 2023 Mar;80(3):590-597. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.20373. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
3
Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on Effects of Intensive Compared With Standard Blood Pressure Control.基础舒张压对强化与标准血压控制效果影响的研究。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 9;137(2):134-143. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030848. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
4
Single-Pill Combination Product Availability of the Antihypertensive Regimens Used for Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Treatment in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.用于强化收缩压治疗的抗高血压方案的单片复方制剂的可获得性:收缩压干预试验。
Hypertension. 2023 Aug;80(8):1749-1758. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21132. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
5
Association of Total Medication Burden With Intensive and Standard Blood Pressure Control and Clinical Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis of SPRINT.总药物负担与强化和标准血压控制及临床结局的关联:SPRINT的二次分析
Hypertension. 2019 Aug;74(2):267-275. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12907. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
6
Systolic Blood Pressure Time in Target Range and Cognitive Outcomes: Insights From the SPRINT MIND Trial.目标范围内的收缩压时间与认知结局:SPRINT MIND 试验的新见解。
Hypertension. 2023 Aug;80(8):1628-1636. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.20711. Epub 2023 May 11.
7
Clinical Outcomes by Race and Ethnicity in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT): A Randomized Clinical Trial.种族和民族对收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)临床结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Hypertens. 2017 Dec 8;31(1):97-107. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpx138.
8
Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Cerebral Blood Flow: Secondary Analysis of the SPRINT MIND Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制与脑血流的关系:SPRINT MIND 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Apr 1;79(4):380-389. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.0074.
9
Applicability and cost-effectiveness of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) in the Chinese population: A cost-effectiveness modeling study.在中国人群中开展收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)的适用性和成本效益:一项成本效益建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2021 Mar 4;18(3):e1003515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003515. eCollection 2021 Mar.
10
Potential Deaths Averted and Serious Adverse Events Incurred From Adoption of the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) Intensive Blood Pressure Regimen in the United States: Projections From NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey).在美国采用收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)强化血压治疗方案避免的潜在死亡和发生的严重不良事件:来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的预测
Circulation. 2017 Apr 25;135(17):1617-1628. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025322. Epub 2017 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
High-resistance inspiratory muscle strength training: a promising strategy for improving vascular health in chronic kidney disease.高阻力吸气肌力量训练:改善慢性肾脏病血管健康的一种有前景的策略。
Front Physiol. 2025 Apr 25;16:1582777. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1582777. eCollection 2025.
2
Does mean systolic blood pressure less than 130 mm Hg ensure high rates of control to <140/<90 mm Hg? A cross-sectional analysis of two cohorts.收缩压均值低于130毫米汞柱就能确保高血压控制率维持在<140/<90毫米汞柱的高水平吗?两项队列研究的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 7;15(4):e090440. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090440.
3
Effect of Initiation and Continuous Adherence to ARBs Versus ACEIs on Risk of Adjudicated Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia.
起始并持续服用血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)对经判定的轻度认知障碍或痴呆风险的影响。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025 Jun 10;80(7). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf028.
4
The contribution of cumulative blood pressure load to dementia, cognitive function and mortality in older adults.老年人累积血压负荷对痴呆、认知功能和死亡率的影响。
J Hypertens. 2024 Nov 1;42(11):1922-1931. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003808. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
5
In emergency hypertension, could biomarkers change the guidelines?在急诊高血压中,生物标志物会改变指南吗?
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Mar 13;24(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03785-3.
6
Role of Diuretics in Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: A Post Hoc Analysis.利尿剂在收缩压干预试验中的心血管事件和死亡率中的作用:事后分析。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 May 1;19(5):620-627. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000406. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
7
Association Between Self-Reported Medication Adherence and Therapeutic Inertia in Hypertension: A Secondary Analysis of SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).自我报告的药物依从性与高血压治疗惰性之间的关联:收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)的二次分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 6;13(3):e031574. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031574. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
8
Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in CKD: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.固定剂量联合治疗用于预防 CKD 患者的心血管疾病:一项个体参与者数据的荟萃分析。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023 Nov 1;18(11):1408-1415. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000251. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
9
Estimated Population Health Benefits of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Treatment Among SPRINT-Eligible US Adults.SPRINT 资格美国成年人强化收缩压治疗的预估人群健康获益。
Am J Hypertens. 2023 Aug 5;36(9):498-508. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpad047.
10
Single-Pill Combination Product Availability of the Antihypertensive Regimens Used for Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Treatment in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.用于强化收缩压治疗的抗高血压方案的单片复方制剂的可获得性:收缩压干预试验。
Hypertension. 2023 Aug;80(8):1749-1758. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21132. Epub 2023 Jun 8.