Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231173234. doi: 10.1177/23312165231173234.
The aim of this study was to assess feasibility of using electrophysiological auditory steady-state response (ASSR) masking for detecting dead regions (DRs). Fifteen normally hearing adults were tested using behavioral and electrophysiological tasks. In the electrophysiological task, ASSRs were recorded to a 2 kHz exponentially amplitude-modulated tone (AM2) presented within a notched threshold equalizing noise (TEN) whose center frequency (CF) varied. We hypothesized that, in the absence of DRs, ASSR amplitudes would be largest for CF at/or near the signal frequency. In the presence of a DR at the signal frequency, the largest ASSR amplitude would occur at a frequency () far away from the signal frequency. The AM2 and the TEN were presented at 60 and 75 dB SPL, respectively. In the behavioral task, for the same maskers as above, the masker level at which an AM and a pure tone could just be distinguished, denoted AM2ML, was determined, for low (10 dB above absolute AM2 threshold) and high (60 dB SPL) signal levels. We also hypothesized that the value of would be similar for both techniques. The ASSR values obtained from grand average ASSR amplitudes, but not from individual amplitudes, were consistent with our hypotheses. The agreement between the behavioral and ASSR was poor. The within-session ASSR-amplitude repeatability was good for AM2 alone, but poor for AM2 in notched TEN. The ASSR-amplitude variability between and within participants seems to be a major roadblock to developing our approach into an effective DR detection method.
本研究旨在评估使用电生理听觉稳态反应(ASSR)掩蔽来检测死区(DR)的可行性。15 名听力正常的成年人接受了行为和电生理任务的测试。在电生理任务中,使用带缺口的阈值均衡噪声(TEN)记录到 2 kHz 指数幅度调制(AM)的 ASSR,其中心频率(CF)变化。我们假设,在没有 DR 的情况下,ASSR 幅度将在信号频率或附近的 CF 处最大。在信号频率处存在 DR 的情况下,最大的 ASSR 幅度将发生在远离信号频率的频率()处。AM2 和 TEN 分别以 60 和 75 dB SPL 呈现。在行为任务中,对于相同的掩蔽器,确定了可以区分 AM 和纯音的掩蔽器水平,记为 AM2ML,对于低(比绝对 AM2 阈值高 10 dB)和高(60 dB SPL)信号水平。我们还假设两种技术的 值相似。从总体平均 ASSR 幅度而不是从个体幅度获得的 ASSR 值与我们的假设一致。行为 和 ASSR 的 之间的一致性很差。单独的 AM2 具有良好的 ASSR 幅度的会话内可重复性,但在带缺口的 TEN 中 AM2 的可重复性很差。参与者之间和之间的 ASSR 幅度变化似乎是将我们的方法发展为有效的 DR 检测方法的主要障碍。