George Preethy, Jones Nev, Goldman Howard, Rosenblatt Abram
Westat, 1600 Research Blvd, Rockville, MD, 20850, United States.
University of Pittsburgh, School of Social Work, 2314 Cathedral of Learning, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, United States.
SSM Ment Health. 2023 Dec;3. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100205. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
The history of psychosis treatment follows a series of four cycles of reform which provide a framework for understanding mental health services in the United States. The first three cycles of reform promoted the view that early treatment of mental disorders would reduce chronic impairment and disability. The Moral Treatment era (early 1800's to 1890) featured freestanding asylums, the Mental Hygiene movement (1890 to World War II) introduced psychiatric hospitals and clinics, and the Community Mental Health Reform period (World War II to late 1970's) produced community mental health centers. None of these approaches succeeded in achieving the disability-prevention goals of early treatment of psychosis. The fourth cycle, the Community Support Reform era (late 1970's to the present) shifted the focus to caring for those already disabled by a mental disorder within their communities and using natural support systems. This shift embraced a broader social welfare framework and included additional services and supports, such as housing, case management, and education. Psychosis became more central during the current Community Support Reform era partly because individuals with psychosis continued to have disabling life experiences despite efforts at reform. Some degree of recovery from psychosis is possible, and individuals with serious impairment may move towards social integration and community participation. Early intervention for young people with psychosis focuses on reducing the negative sequelae of psychosis and promotes recovery-oriented changes in service delivery. The role of social control, the involvement of service users and their families, and the balance between psychosocial and biomedical treatments play an important role in this history. This paper describes the reform cycles, their political and policy contexts, and what influenced its successes and shortcomings.
精神病治疗的历史经历了四个改革周期,这些周期为理解美国的心理健康服务提供了一个框架。前三个改革周期推动了这样一种观点,即精神障碍的早期治疗将减少慢性损伤和残疾。道德治疗时代(19世纪初至1890年)以独立的精神病院为特色,心理卫生运动(1890年至第二次世界大战)引入了精神病医院和诊所,社区心理健康改革时期(第二次世界大战至20世纪70年代末)产生了社区心理健康中心。这些方法都没有成功实现精神病早期治疗的预防残疾目标。第四个周期,即社区支持改革时代(20世纪70年代末至今),将重点转移到在社区内照顾那些已经因精神障碍而残疾的人,并利用自然支持系统。这种转变包含了更广泛的社会福利框架,并包括了额外的服务和支持,如住房、个案管理和教育。在当前的社区支持改革时代,精神病变得更加核心,部分原因是尽管进行了改革努力,但患有精神病的个体仍然有致残的生活经历。从精神病中实现一定程度的康复是可能的,严重受损的个体可能朝着社会融合和社区参与的方向发展。对患有精神病的年轻人进行早期干预的重点是减少精神病的负面后遗症,并促进服务提供方面以康复为导向的变革。社会控制的作用、服务使用者及其家庭的参与,以及心理社会治疗和生物医学治疗之间的平衡在这段历史中发挥了重要作用。本文描述了改革周期、它们的政治和政策背景,以及影响其成败的因素。