Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shinshu University Hospital, Nagano, Japan; Japanese Society of Pathology, Tokyo, Japan.
Graduate School of Informatics, Nagoya University, Aichi, Japan.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Dec;98(6):925-933.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.06.056. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
Gastric cancer (GC) is associated with chronic gastritis. To evaluate the risk, the Operative Link on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Assessment (OLGIM) system was constructed and showed a higher GC risk in stage III or IV patients, determined by the degree of intestinal metaplasia (IM). Although the OLGIM system is useful, evaluating the degree of IM requires substantial experience to produce precise scoring. Whole-slide imaging is becoming routine, but most artificial intelligence (AI) systems in pathology are focused on neoplastic lesions.
Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were scanned. Images were divided into each gastric biopsy tissue sample and labeled with an IM score. IM was scored as follows: 0 (no IM), 1 (mild IM), 2 (moderate IM), and 3 (severe IM). Overall, 5753 images were prepared. A deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model, ResNet50, was used for classification.
ResNet50 classified images with and without IM with a sensitivity of 97.7% and specificity of 94.6%. IM scores 2 and 3, involved as criteria of stage III or IV in the OLGIM system, were classified by ResNet50 in 18%. The respective sensitivity and specificity values of classifying IM between scores 0 and 1 and 2 and 3 were 98.5% and 94.9%, respectively. The IM scores classified by pathologists and the AI system were different in only 438 images (7.6%), and we found that ResNet50 tended to miss small foci of IM but successfully identified minimal IM areas that pathologists missed during the review.
Our findings suggested that this AI system would contribute to evaluating the risk of GC accuracy, reliability, and repeatability with worldwide standardization.
胃癌(GC)与慢性胃炎相关。为了评估风险,构建了胃肠上皮化生评估操作链接(OLGIM)系统,该系统显示,肠上皮化生(IM)程度为 III 期或 IV 期的患者 GC 风险较高。尽管 OLGIM 系统很有用,但评估 IM 程度需要丰富的经验才能进行准确评分。全玻片成像已成为常规,但病理学中的大多数人工智能(AI)系统都专注于肿瘤性病变。
苏木精和伊红染色的载玻片被扫描。图像被分为每个胃活检组织样本,并标记有 IM 评分。IM 评分如下:0(无 IM)、1(轻度 IM)、2(中度 IM)和 3(重度 IM)。总共准备了 5753 张图像。使用深度卷积神经网络(DCNN)模型 ResNet50 进行分类。
ResNet50 对有和无 IM 的图像进行分类,敏感性为 97.7%,特异性为 94.6%。OLGIM 系统中作为 III 期或 IV 期标准的 IM 评分 2 和 3,被 ResNet50 分类为 18%。分类 IM 评分 0 与 1 以及 2 与 3 的敏感性和特异性值分别为 98.5%和 94.9%。病理学家和 AI 系统分类的 IM 评分仅在 438 张图像(7.6%)中存在差异,我们发现 ResNet50 倾向于错过 IM 的小焦点,但成功识别了病理学家在审查过程中遗漏的最小 IM 区域。
我们的研究结果表明,该 AI 系统将有助于以全球标准化的方式准确、可靠且可重复地评估 GC 风险。