Cavaillon Jean-Marc
Institut Pasteur, 28 Rue Dr. Roux, 75015, Paris, France.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2023 Oct;65(2):183-187. doi: 10.1007/s12016-023-08965-1. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
The most severe forms of COVID-19 share many features with bacterial sepsis and have thus been considered to be a viral sepsis. Innate immunity and inflammation are closely linked. While the immune response aims to get rid of the infectious agent, the pro-inflammatory host response can result in organ injury including acute respiratory distress syndrome. On its side, a compensatory anti-inflammatory response, aimed to dampen the inflammatory reaction, can lead to immunosuppression. Whether these two key events of the host inflammatory response are consecutive or concomitant has been regularly depicted in schemes. Initially proposed from 2001 to 2013 to be two consecutive steps, the concomitant occurrence has been supported since 2013, although it was proposed for the first time in 2001. Despite a consensus was reached, the two consecutive steps were still recently proposed for COVID-19. We discuss why the concomitance view could have been initiated as early as 1995.
新冠病毒病的最严重形式与细菌性脓毒症有许多共同特征,因此被认为是一种病毒性脓毒症。固有免疫和炎症密切相关。虽然免疫反应旨在清除感染因子,但促炎性宿主反应可导致包括急性呼吸窘迫综合征在内的器官损伤。另一方面,旨在抑制炎症反应的代偿性抗炎反应可导致免疫抑制。宿主炎症反应的这两个关键事件是相继发生还是同时发生,在相关示意图中经常有所描述。最初在2001年至2013年被认为是两个相继的步骤,自2013年以来,同时发生的观点得到了支持,尽管它在2001年就首次被提出。尽管已达成共识,但最近仍有人针对新冠病毒病提出这两个相继步骤的观点。我们讨论了为什么同时发生的观点早在1995年就已被提出。