• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荚蒾属(五福花科)的叶绿体基因组比较分析:对近缘种Wall. ex DC. Blume系统发育关系的推断

Comparative chloroplast genome analysis of L. (Viburnaceae): inference for phylogenetic relationships among the closely related Wall. ex DC Blume.

作者信息

Waswa Emmanuel Nyongesa, Mkala Elijah Mbandi, Odago Wyclif Ochieng, Amenu Sara Getachew, Mutinda Elizabeth Syowai, Muthui Samuel Wamburu, Ding Shi-Xiong, Hu Guang-Wan, Wang Qing-Feng

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China.

Sino-Africa Joint Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jun 16;14:1179510. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1179510. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpls.2023.1179510
PMID:37396648
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10313135/
Abstract

L. is found in the family Viburnaceae (syn. Adoxaceae) and encompasses approximately 29 accepted species. The complex morphology of these species has caused continued confusion concerning their nomenclature, classification, and identification. Despite previous attempts to resolve taxonomic complexities in the genus, there are still unclear phylogenetic relationships among several species. In this study, the newly obtained plastome of Hance. as well as the populations of L., Blume, and Wall. ex DC were sequenced, and their sizes, structural similarity, gene order, gene number, and guanine-cytosine (GC) contents were analyzed. The phylogenetic analyses were conducted using the whole chloroplast genomes and protein-coding genes (PCGs). The findings revealed that the chloroplast genomes of species exhibited typical quadripartite double-stranded DNA molecules. Their lengths ranged from 158,012 base pairs (bp) () to 158,716 bp ( L). Each genome comprised a pair of inverted repeats (IRs), which separated the large single-copy (LSC) and small single-copy (SSC) regions. In addition, the plastomes contained 132 genes, encompassing 87 protein-coding, 37 tRNA, and four rRNA genes. In the simple sequence repeat (SSR) analysis, A/T mononucleotides had the highest proportion, with the most repetitive sequences observed in . The comparative genome analyses showed high similarities in structure, order, and gene contents. The hypervariable regions in the studied chloroplast genomes were , , , , , and , which may be used as candidate barcodes for species discrimination in genus. Phylogenetic analyses supported the monophyly of and revealed the separation of and populations. Lindl. was nested within in the same clade, collaborating their conspecific treatment. These outcomes indicate that the chloroplast genome of plants is a valuable genetic resource for resolving taxonomic discrepancies at the lower taxonomic levels and can be applied in molecular evolutionary studies.

摘要

荚蒾属植物属于五福花科(同义词:接骨木科),包含约29个公认的物种。这些物种复杂的形态导致了它们在命名、分类和鉴定方面一直存在混淆。尽管此前曾试图解决该属的分类复杂性问题,但仍有几个物种之间的系统发育关系不明确。在本研究中,对新获得的荚蒾属植物的叶绿体基因组以及荚蒾属、荚蒾属、荚蒾属和荚蒾属的种群进行了测序,并分析了它们的大小、结构相似性、基因顺序、基因数量和鸟嘌呤-胞嘧啶(GC)含量。使用整个叶绿体基因组和蛋白质编码基因(PCG)进行系统发育分析。研究结果表明,荚蒾属物种的叶绿体基因组呈现典型的四分体双链DNA分子。它们的长度范围从158,012碱基对(bp)(荚蒾属)到158,716 bp(荚蒾属)。每个基因组都包含一对反向重复序列(IR),将大单拷贝(LSC)和小单拷贝(SSC)区域分开。此外,叶绿体基因组包含132个基因,包括87个蛋白质编码基因、37个tRNA基因和4个rRNA基因。在简单序列重复(SSR)分析中,A/T单核苷酸比例最高,在荚蒾属中观察到的重复序列最多。比较基因组分析表明,它们在结构、顺序和基因含量方面具有高度相似性。所研究的叶绿体基因组中的高变区为、、、、和,这些区域可作为荚蒾属物种鉴定的候选条形码。系统发育分析支持荚蒾属的单系性,并揭示了荚蒾属和荚蒾属种群的分离。荚蒾属植物嵌套在同一分支中的荚蒾属内,支持它们的同种处理。这些结果表明,荚蒾属植物的叶绿体基因组是解决较低分类水平上分类差异的宝贵遗传资源,可应用于分子进化研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/2847d7343582/fpls-14-1179510-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/23f7812f5351/fpls-14-1179510-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/8077fdf53590/fpls-14-1179510-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/bf2d71fa0633/fpls-14-1179510-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/c08310ba4ae4/fpls-14-1179510-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/48b363990a92/fpls-14-1179510-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/19c8f2cc56ef/fpls-14-1179510-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/41860026fbf8/fpls-14-1179510-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/42882e829c54/fpls-14-1179510-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/1d1d5ced05f9/fpls-14-1179510-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/6bb9620e39c2/fpls-14-1179510-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/a98ec9376f65/fpls-14-1179510-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/dd66ed1cd50a/fpls-14-1179510-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/8cb2f9a9d76a/fpls-14-1179510-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/a8f599c88d74/fpls-14-1179510-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/2847d7343582/fpls-14-1179510-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/23f7812f5351/fpls-14-1179510-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/8077fdf53590/fpls-14-1179510-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/bf2d71fa0633/fpls-14-1179510-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/c08310ba4ae4/fpls-14-1179510-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/48b363990a92/fpls-14-1179510-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/19c8f2cc56ef/fpls-14-1179510-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/41860026fbf8/fpls-14-1179510-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/42882e829c54/fpls-14-1179510-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/1d1d5ced05f9/fpls-14-1179510-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/6bb9620e39c2/fpls-14-1179510-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/a98ec9376f65/fpls-14-1179510-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/dd66ed1cd50a/fpls-14-1179510-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/8cb2f9a9d76a/fpls-14-1179510-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/a8f599c88d74/fpls-14-1179510-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d897/10313135/2847d7343582/fpls-14-1179510-g015.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative chloroplast genome analysis of L. (Viburnaceae): inference for phylogenetic relationships among the closely related Wall. ex DC Blume.荚蒾属(五福花科)的叶绿体基因组比较分析:对近缘种Wall. ex DC. Blume系统发育关系的推断
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jun 16;14:1179510. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1179510. eCollection 2023.
2
A systematic comparison of eight new plastome sequences from L.来自L.的八个新质体基因组序列的系统比较
PeerJ. 2019 Mar 11;7:e6563. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6563. eCollection 2019.
3
The complete chloroplast genome of Onobrychis gaubae (Fabaceae-Papilionoideae): comparative analysis with related IR-lacking clade species.奥氏野豌豆(豆科蝶形花亚科)完整叶绿体基因组:与相关无 IR 区类群物种的比较分析。
BMC Plant Biol. 2022 Feb 19;22(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03465-4.
4
Comparative Genomics and Phylogenetic Analysis Revealed the Chloroplast Genome Variation and Interspecific Relationships of (Betulaceae) Species.比较基因组学和系统发育分析揭示了桦木科物种的叶绿体基因组变异和种间关系。
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jul 9;9:927. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00927. eCollection 2018.
5
Complete chloroplast genomes of eight Delphinium taxa (Ranunculaceae) endemic to Xinjiang, China: insights into genome structure, comparative analysis, and phylogenetic relationships.中国新疆特有 8 种獐牙菜属(毛茛科)植物的完整叶绿体基因组:基因组结构、比较分析和系统发育关系的见解。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Jun 26;24(1):600. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05279-y.
6
Phylogeny and diversification of genus Sanicula L. (Apiaceae): novel insights from plastid phylogenomic analyses.山茱萸属(伞形科)的系统发育和多样化:质体基因组学分析的新见解。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Jan 24;24(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-04750-0.
7
Plastome structure of 8 Calanthe s.l. species (Orchidaceae): comparative genomics, phylogenetic analysis.8 种 Calanthe s.l. 物种(兰科)的质体基因组结构:比较基因组学、系统发育分析。
BMC Plant Biol. 2022 Aug 3;22(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03736-0.
8
Comparative chloroplast genomes and phylogenetic relationships of Aglaonema modestum and five variegated cultivars of Aglaonema.Aglaonema modestum 及其五个花叶品种的叶绿体基因组比较及系统发育关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 2;17(9):e0274067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274067. eCollection 2022.
9
New Insights into Phylogenetic Relationship of (Araliaceae) Based on Plastid Genomes.基于质体基因组探讨(伞形科)的系统发育关系的新见解。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Nov 22;24(23):16629. doi: 10.3390/ijms242316629.
10
Comparative and Phylogenetic Analysis of Complete Chloroplast Genomes in Eragrostideae (Chloridoideae, Poaceae).画眉草亚科(禾本科,虎尾草族)叶绿体全基因组的比较与系统发育分析
Plants (Basel). 2021 Jan 6;10(1):109. doi: 10.3390/plants10010109.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome and comparative analysis of the phylogeny and codon usage bias of three Yunnan wild rice species.三种云南野生稻叶绿体全基因组特征分析及其系统发育和密码子使用偏好性比较分析
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jul 2;16:1555104. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1555104. eCollection 2025.
2
In Silico Genomic Analysis of Chloroplast DNA in Vitis L.: Identification of Key Regions for DNA Coding.葡萄叶绿体DNA的计算机基因组分析:DNA编码关键区域的鉴定
Genes (Basel). 2025 May 31;16(6):686. doi: 10.3390/genes16060686.
3
Analysis of chloroplast genome characteristics and codon usage bias in 14 species of Annonaceae.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Chloroplast Genome Analysis of Wax Gourd ) with Three Benincaseae Species, Revealing Evolutionary Dynamic Patterns and Phylogenetic Implications.与三种马利筋属物种的叶绿体基因组比较分析,揭示了进化动态模式和系统发育意义。
Genes (Basel). 2022 Mar 4;13(3):461. doi: 10.3390/genes13030461.
2
Ethnobotany, phytochemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology of the genus Sambucus L. (Viburnaceae).接骨木属(忍冬科)的民族植物学、植物化学、药理学和毒理学。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2022 Jun 28;292:115102. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2022.115102. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
3
Phylogenomic and comparative analyses of Coffeeae alliance (Rubiaceae): deep insights into phylogenetic relationships and plastome evolution.
分析 14 种番荔枝科植物叶绿体基因组特征和密码子使用偏好。
Funct Integr Genomics. 2024 May 27;24(3):109. doi: 10.1007/s10142-024-01389-w.
4
Comparative chloroplast genomes of species: genome evolution and phylogenomic implications.物种的比较叶绿体基因组:基因组进化及系统发育学意义
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Apr 30;15:1349358. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1349358. eCollection 2024.
咖啡亚族联盟(茜草科)的系统基因组学和比较分析:系统发育关系和质体基因组进化的深入见解。
BMC Plant Biol. 2022 Feb 26;22(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03480-5.
4
Comparative transcriptome analysis and identification of candidate adaptive evolution genes of ..的比较转录组分析及候选适应性进化基因的鉴定
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2021 Jul;27(7):1499-1512. doi: 10.1007/s12298-021-01030-1. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
5
Sambucus Nigra Extracts-Natural Antioxidants and Antimicrobial Compounds.黑接骨木提取物——天然抗氧化剂和抗菌化合物。
Molecules. 2021 May 14;26(10):2910. doi: 10.3390/molecules26102910.
6
Plastid phylogenomic insights into the evolution of subfamily Dialioideae (Leguminosae).质体系统基因组学对云实亚科(豆科)进化的见解
Plant Divers. 2020 Jul 15;43(1):27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2020.06.008. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
Complete chloroplast genomes shed light on phylogenetic relationships, divergence time, and biogeography of Allioideae (Amaryllidaceae).完整的叶绿体基因组揭示了葱属(石蒜科)的系统发育关系、分化时间和生物地理学。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 5;11(1):3262. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82692-5.
8
The complete chloroplast genome sequence of (Adoxaceae).五福花科(Adoxaceae)的完整叶绿体基因组序列。
Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2019 Sep 30;4(2):3278-3279. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1667919.
9
Analysis of six chloroplast genomes provides insight into the evolution of Chrysosplenium (Saxifragaceae).分析六个叶绿体基因组,深入了解贯叶金丝桃属(虎耳草科)的进化。
BMC Genomics. 2020 Sep 10;21(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07045-4.
10
Phylogenetic and Comparative Analyses of Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Chinese and (Adoxaceae).中国接骨木属(五福花科)叶绿体全基因组的系统发育与比较分析
Plants (Basel). 2020 Sep 3;9(9):1143. doi: 10.3390/plants9091143.