• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨学科和跨专业沟通干预:心理安全如何促进沟通并提高患者安全。

Interdisciplinary and interprofessional communication intervention: How psychological safety fosters communication and increases patient safety.

作者信息

Dietl Johanna Elisa, Derksen Christina, Keller Franziska Maria, Lippke Sonia

机构信息

Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, School of Business, Social and Decision Science, Constructor University, Bremen, Germany.

Klinikum Bremerhaven Reinkenheide gGmbH, Treatment Center for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic, Bremerhaven, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 15;14:1164288. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1164288. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1164288
PMID:37397302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10310961/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective teamwork and communication are imperative for patient safety and quality care. Communication errors and human failures are considered the main source of patient harm. Thus, team trainings focusing on communication and creating psychologically safe environments are required. This can facilitate challenging communication and teamwork scenarios, prevent patient safety risks, and increase team performance perception. The sparse research concerning communication interventions calls for an understanding of psychological mechanisms. Therefore, this study investigated mechanisms of an interpersonal team intervention targeting communication and the relation of psychological safety to patient safety and team performance perception based on the applied input-process-output model of team effectiveness.

METHODS

Before and after a 4-h communication intervention for multidisciplinary teams, a paper-pencil survey with = 137 healthcare workers from obstetric units of two university hospitals was conducted. Changes after the intervention in perceived communication, patient safety risks, and team performance perception were analyzed tests. To examine psychological mechanisms regarding psychological safety and communication behavior, mediation analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

On average, perceived patient safety risks were lower after the intervention than before the intervention ( = 3.220, = 0.735; = 2.887, = 0.902). This change was statistically significant ( (67) = 2.760, =.007). However, no such effect was found for interpersonal communication and team performance perception. The results illustrate the mediating role of interpersonal communication between psychological safety and safety performances operationalized as perceived patient safety risks ( = -0.163, 95% CI [-0.310, -0.046]) and team performance perception ( = 0.189, 95% CI [0.044, 0.370]).

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates the psychological mechanisms of communication team training to foster safety performances and psychological safety as an important predecessor for interpersonal communication. Our results highlight the importance of teamwork for patient safety. Interpersonal and interprofessional team training represents a novel approach as it empirically brings together interpersonal communication and collaboration in the context of patient safety. Future research should work on follow-up measures in randomized-controlled trials to broaden an understanding of changes over time.

摘要

背景

有效的团队协作与沟通对于患者安全和优质护理至关重要。沟通失误和人为失误被认为是对患者造成伤害的主要来源。因此,需要开展侧重于沟通并营造心理安全环境的团队培训。这有助于应对具有挑战性的沟通和团队协作场景,预防患者安全风险,并提高团队对自身表现的认知。关于沟通干预措施的研究较少,这就需要了解其心理机制。因此,本研究基于团队有效性的投入 - 过程 - 产出模型,调查了针对沟通的人际团队干预机制,以及心理安全与患者安全和团队表现认知之间的关系。

方法

在对多学科团队进行为期4小时的沟通干预前后,对来自两家大学医院产科单位的137名医护人员进行了纸笔调查。采用测试分析干预后在沟通认知、患者安全风险和团队表现认知方面的变化。为了检验关于心理安全和沟通行为的心理机制,进行了中介分析。

结果

平均而言,干预后感知到的患者安全风险低于干预前(干预前均值 = 3.220,标准差 = 0.735;干预后均值 = 2.887,标准差 = 0.902)。这种变化具有统计学意义(t(67) = 2.760,p =.007)。然而,在人际沟通和团队表现认知方面未发现此类效果。结果表明,人际沟通在心理安全与以感知到的患者安全风险衡量的安全表现(β = -0.163,95%置信区间[-0.310, -0.046])以及团队表现认知(β = 0.189,95%置信区间[0.044, 0.370])之间起中介作用。

讨论

本研究展示了沟通团队培训促进安全表现和心理安全的心理机制,心理安全是人际沟通的重要前提。我们的结果强调了团队协作对患者安全的重要性。人际和跨专业团队培训是一种新颖的方法,因为它在患者安全背景下将人际沟通与协作通过实证结合在一起。未来的研究应致力于随机对照试验中的后续措施,以拓宽对随时间变化的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d58/10310961/0e45228b1d4e/fpsyg-14-1164288-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d58/10310961/d3f4c112be73/fpsyg-14-1164288-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d58/10310961/0e45228b1d4e/fpsyg-14-1164288-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d58/10310961/d3f4c112be73/fpsyg-14-1164288-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d58/10310961/0e45228b1d4e/fpsyg-14-1164288-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Interdisciplinary and interprofessional communication intervention: How psychological safety fosters communication and increases patient safety.跨学科和跨专业沟通干预:心理安全如何促进沟通并提高患者安全。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 15;14:1164288. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1164288. eCollection 2023.
2
The Role of Interpersonal Relations in Healthcare Team Communication and Patient Safety: A Proposed Model of Interpersonal Process in Teamwork.人际关系在医疗团队沟通与患者安全中的作用:团队合作中人际关系过程的一个拟议模型
Can J Nurs Res. 2017 Jun;49(2):75-93. doi: 10.1177/0844562117699349. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
3
Psychological safety between pediatric residents and nurses and the impact of an interdisciplinary simulation curriculum.儿科住院医师和护士之间的心理安全感和跨学科模拟课程的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 29;22(1):649. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03709-9.
4
The evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to promote "speaking up" and strengthen interprofessional teamwork climate perceptions.一项旨在促进“直言不讳”并增强跨专业团队合作氛围认知的多方面干预措施的评估。
J Interprof Care. 2017 Mar;31(2):207-217. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1249280. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
5
Teams, tribes and patient safety: overcoming barriers to effective teamwork in healthcare.团队、群体与患者安全:克服医疗保健中有效团队合作的障碍。
Postgrad Med J. 2014 Mar;90(1061):149-54. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131168. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
6
Interprofessional education in team communication: working together to improve patient safety.团队沟通中的跨专业教育:携手合作以提高患者安全。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 May;22(5):414-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000952. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
7
Conceptualizing Interprofessional Teams as Multi-Team Systems-Implications for Assessment and Training.将跨专业团队概念化为多团队系统——对评估和培训的启示
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(4):366-9. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1077136.
8
Does team reflexivity impact teamwork and communication in interprofessional hospital-based healthcare teams? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.团队反思是否会影响跨专业医院医疗团队的团队合作和沟通?系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Aug;29(8):672-683. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009921. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
9
Modelling the effect of perceived interdependence among mental healthcare professionals on their work role performance.模拟精神卫生保健专业人员之间感知到的相互依赖对其工作角色表现的影响。
J Interprof Care. 2017 Jul;31(4):520-528. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1305951. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
10
Interprofessional team member's satisfaction: a mixed methods study of a Chilean hospital.跨专业团队成员的满意度:智利一家医院的混合方法研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2018 Jul 11;16(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0290-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring patient's clinical outcomes, hospital costs, and satisfaction after the implementation of integrated clinical pathway-based nursing practice model.探索基于综合临床路径的护理实践模式实施后的患者临床结局、医院成本及满意度。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2025 Jul 30;23(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12962-025-00645-5.
2
Cultivating compassion in care: evaluating a compassion-training intervention and exploring barriers to compassionate care in postgraduate medical education in Pakistan: a mixed-methods study.在医疗护理中培养同情心:评估巴基斯坦研究生医学教育中的同情心培训干预措施并探究实施富有同情心护理的障碍:一项混合方法研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07056-3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
What factors affect team members' evaluation of collaboration in medical teams?哪些因素会影响医疗团队成员对团队协作的评价?
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 12;13:1031902. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1031902. eCollection 2022.
2
Reducing preventable adverse events in obstetrics by improving interprofessional communication skills - Results of an intervention study.通过提高跨专业沟通技巧减少产科可预防不良事件 - 一项干预研究的结果。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jan 23;23(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05304-8.
3
Psychological safety between pediatric residents and nurses and the impact of an interdisciplinary simulation curriculum.
Evaluating the outcomes of patient safety education programs in nursing education: a scoping review.
评估护理教育中患者安全教育项目的成果:一项范围综述
BMC Nurs. 2025 Mar 12;24(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02858-8.
4
Psychological safety in health professions education: insights and strategies from a global community of practice.卫生专业教育中的心理安全:来自全球实践社区的见解与策略。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 24;11:1508992. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1508992. eCollection 2024.
5
Establishing a Just Culture: Implications for the Veterans Health Administration Journey to High Reliability.建立公正文化:对退伍军人健康管理局迈向高可靠性的启示。
Fed Pract. 2024 Sep;41(9):290-297. doi: 10.12788/fp.0512. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
6
Validation of the Neuroception of Psychological Safety Scale (NPSS) Among Health and Social Care Workers in the UK.英国健康与社会护理工作者心理安全感神经感知量表(NPSS)的验证
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 23;21(12):1551. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121551.
7
Editorial: Psychological Safety in Healthcare Settings.社论:医疗环境中的心理安全。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Dec 2;69:1608073. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1608073. eCollection 2024.
8
Implementing Lifestyle Medicine Competencies in Didactic and Clinical Settings for Allied Health Professionals: A Call to Action.在辅助医疗专业人员的理论教学和临床环境中实施生活方式医学能力:行动呼吁。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024 Mar 31;18(5):681-685. doi: 10.1177/15598276241240412. eCollection 2024 Sep-Oct.
9
Psychological Safety Competency Training During the Clinical Internship From the Perspective of Health Care Trainee Mentors in 11 Pan-European Countries: Mixed Methods Observational Study.11 个泛欧国家医疗实习导师视角下的临床实习期间心理安全能力培训:混合方法观察性研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Oct 7;10:e64125. doi: 10.2196/64125.
10
Work-related smartphone use during off-job hours and work-life conflict: A scoping review.非工作时间与工作相关的智能手机使用及工作-生活冲突:一项范围综述
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Jul 30;3(7):e0000554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000554. eCollection 2024 Jul.
儿科住院医师和护士之间的心理安全感和跨学科模拟课程的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 29;22(1):649. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03709-9.
4
Interprofessional teamwork before and after organizational change in a tertiary emergency department: An observational study.多专业团队协作在一家三级急症部组织变革前后:一项观察性研究。
J Interprof Care. 2023 Mar-Apr;37(2):300-311. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2022.2065250. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
5
Managing psychological safety in debriefings: a dynamic balancing act.在汇报情况时管理心理安全感:一项动态的平衡行为。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Apr 20;6(3):164-171. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000470. eCollection 2020.
6
Psychological Intervention to Improve Communication and Patient Safety in Obstetrics: Examination of the Health Action Process Approach.改善产科沟通与患者安全的心理干预:健康行动过程方法研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 18;13:771626. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.771626. eCollection 2022.
7
Experiences of using the ISBAR tool after an intervention: A focus group study among critical care nurses and anaesthesiologists.使用 ISBAR 工具后的体验:一项重症监护护士和麻醉师的焦点小组研究。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Jun;70:103195. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103195. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
8
A concept analysis of psychological safety: Further understanding for application to health care.心理安全感的概念分析:进一步理解其在医疗保健中的应用。
Nurs Open. 2022 Jan;9(1):467-489. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1086. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
9
Development of the perceptions of preventable adverse events assessment tool (PPAEAT): measurement properties and patients' mental health status.预防不良事件评估工具(PPAEAT)感知的发展:测量特性与患者心理健康状况。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Apr 16;33(2). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab063.
10
Effectiveness of Communication Interventions in Obstetrics-A Systematic Review.沟通干预措施在产科学中的效果:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 5;18(5):2616. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052616.