James Ariel N, Minnihan Colleen J, Watson Duane G
Department of Psychology, Macalester College, US.
Department of Psychology and Human Development, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, US.
J Cogn. 2023 Jun 28;6(1):30. doi: 10.5334/joc.285. eCollection 2023.
Experience-based theories of language processing suggest that listeners use the properties of their previous linguistic input to constrain comprehension in real time (e.g. MacDonald & Christiansen, 2002; Smith & Levy, 2013; Stanovich & West, 1989; Mishra, Pandey, Singh, & Huettig, 2012). This project investigates the prediction that individual differences in experience will predict differences in sentence comprehension. Participants completed a visual world eye-tracking task following Altmann and Kamide (1999) which manipulates whether the verb licenses the anticipation of a specific referent in the scene (e.g. The boy will eat/move the cake). Within this paradigm, we ask (1) are there reliable individual differences in language-mediated eye movements during this task? If so, (2) do individual differences in language experience correlate with these differences, and (3) can this relationship be explained by other, more general cognitive abilities? Study 1 finds evidence that language experience predicts an overall facilitation in fixating the target, and Study 2 replicates this effect and finds that it remains when controlling for working memory, inhibitory control, phonological ability, and perceptual speed.
基于经验的语言处理理论表明,听者会利用他们之前语言输入的特性来实时限制理解(例如,MacDonald和Christiansen,2002年;Smith和Levy,2013年;Stanovich和West,1989年;Mishra、Pandey、Singh和Huettig,2012年)。本项目研究了这样一种预测,即经验上的个体差异将预测句子理解上的差异。参与者按照Altmann和Kamide(1999年)的方法完成了一项视觉世界眼动追踪任务,该任务操纵动词是否允许对场景中特定指称对象的预期(例如,男孩将吃/移动蛋糕)。在这个范式中,我们问:(1)在这个任务中,语言介导的眼动是否存在可靠的个体差异?如果是这样,(2)语言经验的个体差异是否与这些差异相关,以及(3)这种关系能否由其他更一般的认知能力来解释?研究1发现有证据表明语言经验预测了注视目标时的总体促进作用,研究2重复了这一效应,并发现当控制工作记忆、抑制控制、语音能力和感知速度时,这一效应仍然存在。