Carmines E G, Baxter D J
Adolescence. 1986 Summer;21(82):436-42.
This paper focuses on the difference in political efficacy found between black and white pre-adults, and assesses a specific explanation of this racial difference, one that combines elements of the intelligence explanation with aspects of the social-deprivation explanation as outlined by Paul Abramson. The explanation suggests that the racial difference in feelings of political effectiveness is due to intelligence which, in turn, is basically a function of the social and economic environment. Focusing on a study of 421 black and white students, it is shown that the predictions from the theory are empirically valid. Most importantly, it is demonstrated that once intelligence is controlled for, there is little or no relationship between race and political efficacy--that is, the black and white students are approximately equal in their levels of political effectiveness. Thus the study lends empirical support to this particular explanation of the racial difference in political efficacy, and suggests, more generally, that intelligence may play a significant role in the political socialization process.
本文聚焦于黑人和白人青少年之间在政治效能感上的差异,并评估对这种种族差异的一种特定解释,该解释将智力解释的要素与保罗·阿布拉姆森所概述的社会剥夺解释的各方面结合起来。这种解释认为,政治效能感方面的种族差异归因于智力,而智力反过来基本上是社会和经济环境的一种函数。通过对421名黑人和白人学生的研究表明,该理论的预测在经验上是有效的。最重要的是,研究表明,一旦对智力进行控制,种族与政治效能之间几乎没有关系——也就是说,黑人和白人学生在政治效能水平上大致相当。因此,这项研究为对政治效能方面种族差异的这一特定解释提供了实证支持,并且更普遍地表明,智力可能在政治社会化过程中发挥重要作用。