M. Barbhaiya, MD, MPH, D. Erkan, MD, MPH, Hospital for Special Surgery, and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA;
M. Taghavi, MD, Department of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.
J Rheumatol. 2024 Feb 1;51(2):150-159. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2022-1200.
Antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) nephropathy (-N) can be challenging to recognize due to a lack of established classification or diagnostic criteria. As part of efforts to develop new antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria (CC), the APS CC Renal Pathology Subcommittee aimed to better characterize the entity of aPL-N.
We used a 4-pronged approach that included (1) administering Delphi surveys to worldwide APS physicians to generate aPL-N terminology; (2) conducting a literature review to demonstrate the association of nephropathy with aPL and identify published aPL-N histopathological terminology and descriptions; (3) evaluating aPL-N terminology used in renal biopsy reports from an international patient registry; and (4) evaluating proposed kidney pathologic features for aPL-N by assessment of international Renal Pathology Society (RPS) members.
After completing our metaanalysis demonstrating an association between nephropathy and aPL, we used Delphi surveys, a literature review, and international renal biopsy reports to develop a preliminary definition of aPL-N. The preliminary definition included include specific terms associated with acute (ie, thrombotic microangiopathy in glomeruli or arterioles/arteries) and chronic (ie, organized arterial or arteriolar microthrombi with or without recanalization, organized glomerular thrombi, fibrous and fibrocellular [arterial or arteriolar] occlusions, focal cortical atrophy with or without thyroidization, and fibrous intimal hyperplasia) lesions. Most RPS survey respondents agreed with this terminology and the importance of knowing aPL results for histopathological diagnosis.
Our results support the inclusion of aPL-N in the 2023 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology APS CC, and provide the most widely accepted terminology to date for both acute and chronic pathologic lesions of aPL-N.
由于缺乏既定的分类或诊断标准,抗磷脂抗体(aPL)肾病(-N)可能难以识别。作为制定新的抗磷脂综合征(APS)分类标准(CC)的努力的一部分,APS CC 肾脏病理小组委员会旨在更好地描述 aPL-N 的实体。
我们采用了一种四管齐下的方法,包括(1)向全球 APS 医生进行 Delphi 调查,以产生 aPL-N 术语;(2)进行文献综述,以证明肾病与 aPL 的关联,并确定已发表的 aPL-N 组织病理学术语和描述;(3)评估国际患者登记处的肾脏活检报告中使用的 aPL-N 术语;(4)通过评估国际肾脏病理学会(RPS)成员来评估拟议的肾脏病理特征用于 aPL-N。
在完成我们的荟萃分析表明肾病与 aPL 之间存在关联之后,我们使用 Delphi 调查、文献综述和国际肾脏活检报告来初步定义 aPL-N。初步定义包括与急性(即肾小球或小动脉/动脉中的血栓性微血管病)和慢性(即有或无再通的组织化动脉或小动脉微血栓、组织化肾小球血栓、纤维和纤维细胞性[动脉或小动脉]闭塞、有或无甲状腺化的局灶性皮质萎缩以及纤维内膜增生)病变相关的特定术语。大多数 RPS 调查受访者同意这一术语以及了解 aPL 结果对组织病理学诊断的重要性。
我们的结果支持将 aPL-N 纳入 2023 年美国风湿病学会/欧洲风湿病联盟 APS CC,并且为迄今为止急性和慢性 aPL-N 病理病变提供了最广泛接受的术语。