DeGrado Jeremy R, Szumita Paul M, Schuler Brian R, Dube Kevin M, Lenox Jesslyn, Kim Edy Y, Weinhouse Gerald L, Massaro Anthony F
Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Department of Respiratory Therapy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Oct 19;2(10):e0259. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000259. eCollection 2020 Oct.
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled epoprostenol and inhaled nitric oxide in patients with refractory hypoxemia secondary to coronavirus disease 2019.
Retrospective single-center study.
ICUs at a large academic medical center in the United States.
Thirty-eight adult critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and refractory hypoxemia treated with either inhaled epoprostenol or inhaled nitric oxide for at least 1 hour between March 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020.
Electronic chart review.
Of 93 patients screened, 38 were included in the analysis, with mild (4, 10.5%), moderate (24, 63.2%), or severe (10, 26.3%), with acute respiratory distress syndrome. All patients were initiated on inhaled epoprostenol as the initial pulmonary vasodilator and the median time from intubation to initiation was 137 hours (68-228 h). The median change in Pao/Fio was 0 (-12.8 to 31.6) immediately following administration of inhaled epoprostenol. Sixteen patients were classified as responders (increase Pao/Fio > 10%) to inhaled epoprostenol, with a median increase in Pao/Fio of 34.1 (24.3-53.9). The mean change in Pao and Spo was -0.55 ± 41.8 and -0.6 ± 4.7, respectively. Eleven patients transitioned to inhaled nitric oxide with a median change of 11 (3.6-24.8) in Pao/Fio. A logistic regression analysis did not identify any differences in outcomes or characteristics between the responders and the nonresponders. Minimal adverse events were seen in patients who received either inhaled epoprostenol or inhaled nitric oxide.
We found that the initiation of inhaled epoprostenol and inhaled nitric oxide in patients with refractory hypoxemia secondary to coronavirus disease 2019, on average, did not produce significant increases in oxygenation metrics. However, a group of patients had significant improvement with inhaled epoprostenol and inhaled nitric oxide. Administration of inhaled epoprostenol or inhaled nitric oxide may be considered in patients with severe respiratory failure secondary to coronavirus disease 2019.
本研究的目的是评估吸入依前列醇和吸入一氧化氮对2019冠状病毒病继发难治性低氧血症患者的疗效和安全性。
回顾性单中心研究。
美国一家大型学术医疗中心的重症监护病房。
2020年3月1日至2020年6月30日期间,38例成年2019冠状病毒病重症患者因难治性低氧血症接受吸入依前列醇或吸入一氧化氮治疗至少1小时。
电子病历回顾。
在93例筛查患者中,38例纳入分析,其中轻度(4例,10.5%)、中度(24例,63.2%)或重度(10例,26.3%)急性呼吸窘迫综合征。所有患者均以吸入依前列醇作为初始肺血管扩张剂开始治疗,从插管到开始治疗的中位时间为137小时(68 - 228小时)。吸入依前列醇给药后即刻,Pao/Fio的中位变化为0(-12.8至31.6)。16例患者被归类为对吸入依前列醇有反应者(Pao/Fio增加>10%),Pao/Fio的中位增加为34.1(24.3 - 53.9)。Pao和Spo的平均变化分别为-0.55±41.8和-0.6±4.7。11例患者转而使用吸入一氧化氮,Pao/Fio的中位变化为11(3.6 - 24.8)。逻辑回归分析未发现反应者和无反应者在结局或特征上有任何差异。接受吸入依前列醇或吸入一氧化氮治疗的患者出现的不良事件极少。
我们发现,对于2019冠状病毒病继发难治性低氧血症患者,开始使用吸入依前列醇和吸入一氧化氮,平均而言,并未使氧合指标显著增加。然而,有一组患者使用吸入依前列醇和吸入一氧化氮后有显著改善。对于2019冠状病毒病继发严重呼吸衰竭的患者,可考虑给予吸入依前列醇或吸入一氧化氮治疗。