Beyond the Keyboard: Academic Writing in the Era of ChatGPT.
作者信息
Doskaliuk Bohdana, Zimba Olena
机构信息
Department of Pathophysiology, Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.
Department of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology, University Hospital in Krakow, Krakow, Poland.
出版信息
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Jul 3;38(26):e207. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e207.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Beyond the Keyboard: Academic Writing in the Era of ChatGPT.超越键盘：ChatGPT时代的学术写作
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Jul 3;38(26):e207. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e207.
2
Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance the writing of english academic papers by non-native english-speaking medical students - the educational application of ChatGPT.探讨人工智能在提高非英语母语医学专业学生英文学术论文写作能力方面的潜力——ChatGPT 的教育应用。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05738-y.
3
The impact of using ChatGPT on academic writing among medical undergraduates.使用 ChatGPT 对医学生学术写作的影响。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2426760. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2426760. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
4
Exploring artificial intelligence literacy and the use of ChatGPT and copilot in instruction on nursing academic report writing.探索人工智能素养以及ChatGPT和Copilot在护理学术报告写作教学中的应用。
Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Apr;147:106570. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106570. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
5
ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks.ChatGPT 在学术写作中的应用：最大化其益处，最小化其风险。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Dec 1;71(12):3600-3606. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_718_23. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
6
Beyond the Hype-The Actual Role and Risks of AI in Today's Medical Practice: Comparative-Approach Study.超越炒作——人工智能在当今医学实践中的实际作用和风险：比较研究方法
JMIR AI. 2024 Jan 22;3:e49082. doi: 10.2196/49082.
7
How much can we rely on artificial intelligence chatbots such as the ChatGPT software program to assist with scientific writing?我们能在多大程度上依靠诸如ChatGPT软件程序这样的人工智能聊天机器人来辅助科学写作？
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Apr;133(4):1082-1088. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.05.023. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
8
Utilizing artificial intelligence in academic writing: an in-depth evaluation of a scientific review on fertility preservation written by ChatGPT-4.利用人工智能进行学术写作：对 ChatGPT-4 撰写的关于生育力保存的科学综述的深入评估。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Jul;41(7):1871-1880. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03089-7. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
9
From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing.从人类写作到人工智能生成的文本：审视ChatGPT在学术写作中的前景与潜在威胁。
Biol Sport. 2023 Apr;40(2):615-622. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
10
ChatGPT applications in academic writing: a review of potential, limitations, and ethical challenges.ChatGPT在学术写作中的应用：对其潜力、局限性及伦理挑战的综述
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2025 Jan 27;88(3). doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.2024-0269. eCollection 2025.
引用本文的文献
1
Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review: Enhancing Efficiency While Preserving Integrity.同行评审中的人工智能：提高效率并保持公正性。
J Korean Med Sci. 2025 Feb 24;40(7):e92. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e92.
2
Examining the frequency of artificial intelligence generated content in anesthesiology and intensive care journal publications: A cross sectional study.麻醉学与重症监护期刊出版物中人工智能生成内容的频率研究：一项横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 21;104(8):e41594. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041594.
3
Concise Recommendations for EDitorials: Enhancing Narratives and Composition Effectively (CREDENCE).社论简明建议：有效增强叙述与编排（CREDENCE）。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Dec 30;39(50):e338. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e338.
4
Artificial Intelligence-Generated Editorials in Radiology: Can Expert Editors Detect Them?放射学中人工智能生成的社论：专家编辑能检测出来吗？
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Mar 4;46(3):559-566. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8505.
5
Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.人工智能时代的出版伦理。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Aug 26;39(33):e249. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e249.
6
Evolution of Research Reporting Standards: Adapting to the Influence of Artificial Intelligence, Statistics Software, and Writing Tools.研究报告标准的演变：适应人工智能、统计软件和写作工具的影响。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Aug 19;39(32):e231. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e231.
7
The emerging paradigm in pediatric rheumatology: harnessing the power of artificial intelligence.儿科风湿病学的新兴范例：利用人工智能的力量。
Rheumatol Int. 2024 Nov;44(11):2315-2325. doi: 10.1007/s00296-024-05661-x. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
8
Patient-Friendly Discharge Summaries in Korea Based on ChatGPT: Software Development and Validation.韩国基于 ChatGPT 的患者友好型出院小结：软件开发与验证。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Apr 29;39(16):e148. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e148.
9
Is ChatGPT a "Fire of Prometheus" for Non-Native English-Speaking Researchers in Academic Writing?ChatGPT 是否为非英语母语的学术写作者带来了“普罗米修斯之火”？
Korean J Radiol. 2023 Oct;24(10):952-959. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2023.0773.
10
GPTZero Performance in Identifying Artificial Intelligence-Generated Medical Texts: A Preliminary Study.GPTZero 在识别人工智能生成的医学文本方面的性能：一项初步研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Sep 25;38(38):e319. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e319.
本文引用的文献
1
A Chat(GPT) about the future of scientific publishing.关于科学出版未来的一场Chat（GPT）讨论。
Brain Behav Immun. 2023 May;110:152-154. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.02.022. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
2
Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?人工智能能帮助进行科学写作吗？
Crit Care. 2023 Feb 25;27(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2.
3
Journals take up arms against AI-written text.期刊杂志联手抵制 AI 生成文本。
Science. 2023 Feb 24;379(6634):740-741. doi: 10.1126/science.adh2762. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
4
Large Language Models and the Reverse Turing Test.大语言模型与反向图灵测试。
Neural Comput. 2023 Feb 17;35(3):309-342. doi: 10.1162/neco_a_01563.
5
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author.ChatGPT 很有趣，但不是作者。
Science. 2023 Jan 27;379(6630):313. doi: 10.1126/science.adg7879. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
6
Plagiarism in the Context of Education and Evolving Detection Strategies.教育背景下的抄袭行为与不断发展的检测策略
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Aug;32(8):1220-1227. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.8.1220.
7
Plagiarism Continues to Affect Scholarly Journals.抄袭行为持续影响学术期刊。
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Feb;32(2):183-185. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.2.183.
8
Ten tips for authors of scientific articles.给科学文章作者的十条建议。
J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Aug;29(8):1035-7. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.8.1035. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
9
Authorship and contributorship in scholarly journals.学术期刊中的作者身份与贡献
J Korean Med Sci. 2013 Jun;28(6):801-2. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.6.801.
10
Rules of the game of scientific writing: fair play and plagiarism.科学写作的游戏规则：公平竞争与剽窃
Lancet. 2007 Feb 24;369(9562):641. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60307-9.
Zotero 插件