• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增强指导联合方案提高肠道准备质量:一项前瞻性、盲法、随机、对照研究。

Combination of Enhanced Instructions Improve Quality of Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Colonoscopist-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Study.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Jan 1;65(1):117-124. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002070.

DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000002070
PMID:34459448
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Appropriate bowel preparation is highly important for the efficacy of colonoscopy; however, up to one-third of patients do not accomplish adequate bowel preparation.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the impact of the combination of enhanced instruction on the quality of bowel preparation and its impact on clinically relevant outcomes.

DESIGN

This was a colonoscopist-blinded, prospective, randomized trial.

SETTINGS

All patients received regular instructions for bowel preparation. Patients were randomly assigned to the control, telephone reeducation, and combined enhanced instruction groups.

PATIENTS

Outpatients aged 19 to 75 years scheduled to undergo colonoscopy were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome was adequate bowel preparation rate.

RESULTS

A total of 311 patients were randomly assigned to the combined enhanced instruction (n = 104), telephone reeducation (n = 101), and control groups (n = 106). An intention-to-treat analysis showed that the adequate bowel preparation rate was higher in the combined enhanced instruction group than in the telephone reeducation and control groups (92.3% vs 82.2% vs 76.4%, p = 0.007). The rate of compliance with the instructions was significantly higher in the combined enhanced instruction group than in the telephone reeducation and control groups. Method of education was associated with proper bowel preparation (adjusted OR 17.46; p < 0.001 for combined enhanced instruction relative to control).

LIMITATIONS

This was a single-center study conducted in Korea.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined enhanced instruction as an adjunct to regular instructions much improved the quality of bowel preparation and patients' adherence to the preparation instructions. The combined enhanced instruction method could be the best option for bowel preparation instruction. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B673.

LA COMBINACIN DE INSTRUCCIONES MEJORADAS, INCREMENTA LA CALIDAD DE LA PREPARACIN INTESTINAL ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVO, CONTROLADO, ALEATORIO Y CIEGO PARA EL COLONOSCOPISTA: ANTECEDENTES:La preparación adecuada del intestino es muy importante para la eficacia de la colonoscopia; sin embargo, hasta un tercio de los pacientes no logran buenos resutlados.OBJETIVO:Investigar el impacto de la combinación de instrucciónes claras en la calidad de la preparación intestinal y su impacto en los resultados clínicos.DISEÑO:Trabajo aleatorio, prospectivo y ciego para el colonoscopista.AJUSTES:Los pacientes recibieron instrucciones periódicas para la preparación intestinal. Fueron asignados aleatoriamente al grupo control, educación telefónica y de instrucción mejoradas.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes ambulatorios de 19 a 75 años programados para ser sometidos a colonoscopia.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El principal resultado fue una adecuada preparación intestinal.RESULTADOS:Un total de 311 pacientes fueron asignados al azar a la instrucción mejorada combinada (n = 104), reeducación telefónica (n = 101) y grupo de control (n = 106). El análisis estadístico mostró que la tasa de preparación intestinal adecuada fue mayor en el grupo combinado de instrucción mejorada que en los grupos de reeducación telefónica y control (92,3% vs 82,2% vs 76,4%, p = 0,007). La tasa de cumplimiento de las instrucciones fue significativamente mayor en el grupo de instrucción mejorada combinada que en los otros. El método de educación se asoció con una preparación intestinal adecuada (razón de posibilidades ajustada de 17,46; p <0,001 para la instrucción mejorada combinada en relación con el control.LIMITACIONES:Estudio en un solo centro realizado en Corea.CONCLUSIONES:La instrucción mejorada combinada como complemento de las instrucciones regulares mejoró mucho la calidad de la preparación intestinal y la adherencia de los pacientes a las instrucciones de preparación. El método de instrucción mejorado combinado podría ser la mejor opción para la instrucción de preparación intestinal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B673.

摘要

背景

适当的肠道准备对结肠镜检查的效果至关重要;然而,多达三分之一的患者无法完成充分的肠道准备。

目的

我们研究了增强指导对肠道准备质量的影响及其对临床相关结果的影响。

设计

这是一项结肠镜医师盲法、前瞻性、随机试验。

设置

所有患者均接受常规肠道准备指导。患者被随机分配到对照组、电话再教育组和联合增强指导组。

患者

年龄在 19 至 75 岁之间、计划行结肠镜检查的门诊患者。

主要观察指标

主要结局是肠道准备充分率。

结果

共 311 例患者随机分配至联合增强指导组(n=104)、电话再教育组(n=101)和对照组(n=106)。意向治疗分析显示,联合增强指导组肠道准备充分率高于电话再教育组和对照组(92.3%比 82.2%比 76.4%,p=0.007)。联合增强指导组的指导依从率显著高于电话再教育组和对照组。教育方法与适当的肠道准备相关(调整后的比值比 17.46;p<0.001,联合增强指导组与对照组相比)。

局限性

这是一项在韩国进行的单中心研究。

结论

常规指导基础上联合增强指导可显著提高肠道准备质量和患者对准备指导的依从性。联合增强指导方法可能是肠道准备指导的最佳选择。详见视频摘要,可点击链接http://links.lww.com/DCR/B673。

相似文献

1
Combination of Enhanced Instructions Improve Quality of Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Colonoscopist-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Study.增强指导联合方案提高肠道准备质量:一项前瞻性、盲法、随机、对照研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Jan 1;65(1):117-124. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002070.
2
Comparison of Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety, Bowel Movement Kinetics, and Patient Tolerability of Same-Day and Split-Dose Bowel Preparation Using 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol: A Prospective Randomized Study.同日和分剂量使用 4 升聚乙二醇的肠道准备的肠道清洁效果、安全性、肠道运动动力学和患者耐受性比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Dec;62(12):1518-1527. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001499.
3
Oral Antibiotics Bowel Preparation Without Mechanical Preparation for Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgeries: Current Practice and Future Prospects.口服抗生素肠道准备不联合机械肠道准备用于微创结直肠手术:当前实践与未来展望。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Sep 1;65(9):e897-e906. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002096. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Treatment of Complex Idiopathic Fistula-in-Ano Using Autologous Centrifuged Adipose Tissue Containing Progenitor Cells: A Randomized Controlled Trial.采用含祖细胞的自体离心脂肪组织治疗复杂特发性肛瘘的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Oct 1;64(10):1276-1285. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001924.
5
Effect of Prehabilitation on Stoma Self-Care, Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life in Patients With Stomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial.术前康复对造口患者造口自我护理、焦虑、抑郁及生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Jan 1;66(1):138-147. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002275. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
6
Randomized Pilot Study: Anal Inserts Versus Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Fecal Incontinence.随机试点研究:分析插入物与经皮胫神经刺激治疗粪便失禁的对比。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Apr 1;64(4):466-474. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001913.
7
Ileoanal Pouch Syndrome Is Common and Associated With Significant Disability in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Undergoing IPAA.回肠贮袋肛管吻合术后,溃疡性结肠炎患者常发生贮袋炎综合征,并伴有显著的残疾。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Dec 1;65(12):1503-1513. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002439. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
8
A Prospective Randomized Trial of Surgeon-Administered Intraoperative Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Bupivacaine Against Liposomal Bupivacaine: The TINGLE Trial.前瞻性随机对照试验:外科医生管理下的布比卡因腹横肌平面阻滞与脂质体布比卡因的比较:TINGLE 试验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Jul 1;64(7):888-898. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002008.
9
Impact of Auricular Neurostimulation in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery with an Enhanced Recovery Protocol: A Pilot Randomized, Controlled Trial.耳神经刺激对接受强化康复方案的结直肠手术患者的影响:一项初步随机对照试验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Feb 1;64(2):225-233. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001752.
10
Botulinum Toxin Injection Plus Topical Diltiazem for Chronic Anal Fissure: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial and Long-term Outcome.肉毒杆菌毒素注射联合局部地尔硫卓治疗慢性肛裂:一项随机双盲临床试验及长期结局。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Dec 1;64(12):1521-1530. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001983.

引用本文的文献

1
Online patient endoscopy education platform improves outpatient bowel preparation quality: Retrospective observational study.在线患者内镜检查教育平台可提高门诊肠道准备质量:回顾性观察研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Nov 18;12(11):E1326-E1333. doi: 10.1055/a-2441-8166. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Telephone instructions improve the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.电话指导可提高结肠镜检查的肠道准备质量:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 22;18(11):e0289063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289063. eCollection 2023.
3
Correlation between prescribing doctor attributes and intestinal cleanliness in colonoscopy: a study of 22522 patients.
结肠镜检查中处方医生特征与肠道清洁度的相关性:一项 22522 例患者的研究。
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2262496. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2262496. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
4
Effectiveness of bowel preparation innovative technology instructions (BPITIs) on clinical outcomes among patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肠道准备创新技术指导(BPITIs)对结肠镜检查患者临床结局的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 4;13(1):10783. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37044-w.